Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add HughYau/AcademicForge --skill ligandmpnngit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/HughYau/AcademicForgeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/hughyau/academicforge/ligandmpnn)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hughyau/academicforge/ligandmpnn"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hughyau/academicforge/ligandmpnn/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/hughyau/academicforge/ligandmpnn"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/hughyau/academicforge/ligandmpnn.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00100 | $0.01657 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00050 | $0.00829 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.00331 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
ligandmpnn scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 124 lines · 100 tokens per session scan A 004f25fe7caa
ligandmpnn is a skill published in the GitHub repository HughYau/AcademicForge (2,527 stars, last pushed 10d ago), with no licence file. It adds 100 tokens to every session and 1,657 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-writing
Use when and ONLY when the user explicitly requests paper writing and G4 (write-ready) gate has passed — handles LaTeX structure, senior-level writing, reference verification, and iterative refinement.
experiment-execution
Use when G2 (plan freeze) and G3 (execution readiness) gates have passed — handles all implementation, baseline reproduction, experimentation, and iteration for both Type M and Type D projects; this is Phase 4.
results-integration
Use when core experiments or analyses are complete and results need to be organized into a coherent report for user review before paper writing.
figure-quality-standards
Use whenever generating figures or tables for a research paper — enforces publication-quality visual standards including style consistency, readability, accessibility, and venue-appropriate formatting.
reproducibility-driven-research
Use when implementing any experiment, analysis, or computational task — enforces the HYPOTHESIZE-BASELINE-EXPERIMENT-VERIFY-INTERPRET cycle and reproducibility requirements.
venue-alignment
Use at every gate checkpoint and periodically during experiments to verify that project progress matches the target venue's requirements in terms of experiment scale, novelty depth, and evidence quality.