s4h-constraint-scope-reduction

s4h-constraint-scope-reduction is a skill for Claude Code from human-avatar/skills-for-humanity. It costs 62 tokens per session (1,031 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A structured review that separates what a plan truly needs to do from extra features or requests that are only wanted.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to simplify product requirements, reduce feature lists, narrow project plans, or decide what to leave out.
Why use it?
Plans often grow until they take more time and effort than the real problem requires. It helps define the smallest version that still meets the actual requirement.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: names the AskUserQuestion tool.

Part of the skills-for-humanity plugin — 197 skills, 1 hook shipped together

Good fit Use it to simplify product requirements, reduce feature lists, narrow project plans, or decide what to leave out.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/s4h-constraint-scope-reduction
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add human-avatar/skills-for-humanity --skill s4h-constraint-scope-reduction
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install skills-for-humanity, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 197 skills, 1 hook.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for s4h-constraint-scope-reduction

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/s4h-constraint-scope-reduction/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/s4h-constraint-scope-reduction)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/s4h-constraint-scope-reduction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/s4h-constraint-scope-reduction/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for s4h-constraint-scope-reduction

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/s4h-constraint-scope-reduction"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/human-avatar/skills-for-humanity/s4h-constraint-scope-reduction.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 62 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,031 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00062 $0.01031
Opus 5 $0.00031 $0.00515
Sonnet 5 $0.00012 $0.00206
Haiku 4.5 $0.00006 $0.00103

Measured 13d ago against content hash e144c4dabbf8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

s4h-constraint-scope-reduction scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/s4h-constraint-scope-reduction/SKILL.md · 108 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Constraint Scope Reduction

Scope grows because wants accumulate alongside needs, and no one separates them. This skill forces that separation. The goal is not to build less — it is to find the version where every element is doing real work, and nothing is there because it sounded good in the planning meeting.


Your Process

Step 1: State the Full Current Scope List everything in the current plan, feature set, or requirement. Be complete — you can only strip what you've named.

Framing check: Confirm the constraint and the goal it is blocking before continuing. State what you've identified — the specific scope being reduced and the core job it must accomplish — in one sentence, then use AskUserQuestion:

  • Question: "I'm reading this as: [your one-sentence framing of the scope and the core job it must accomplish]. Is that right?"
  • Header: "Framing"
  • Options:
    • Yes — proceed — framing is correct
    • Adjust — one element is off; user will correct it before you continue
    • Reframe — different situation than read; incorporate the correction before proceeding

Step 2: Find the Core Job Ask: what is the single verb this must do? Not what it should do, what it must do. Strip all nouns and adjectives until only the job remains. "A user can complete a purchase" is a job. "A seamless, intuitive checkout experience" is not.

Step 3: Classify Each Element — Must or Want For every element in scope: is it required for the core job (must) or desired beyond it (want)? Apply pressure to musts — if you removed it, would the core job fail?

Step 4: Remove All Wants and Test Drop every want. Confirm: can the core job still be done? If yes, the wants were not load- bearing. If no, you've found a hidden must — reclassify and investigate why it felt optional.

Step 5: Simplify the Musts For each must: is there a simpler way to achieve the same outcome? Simpler means fewer moving parts, less code, lower cost, or faster delivery — not necessarily less effort to design.

Read the full file on GitHub · 108 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 13d ago First seen · 108 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A e144c4dabbf8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

s4h-constraint-scope-reduction is a skill published in the GitHub repository human-avatar/skills-for-humanity (223 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 62 tokens to every session and 1,031 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

decision-making-under-pressure

Provides practical habits for making better decisions faster -- reframing problems before solving them, knowing when to stop deliberating, balancing intuition with analysis, resisting 'just this once' compromises, and breaking overthinking cycles. Use when facing a high-stakes choice with incomplete data, sensing that…

fatihguner/foreman · 95 tokens

flow-state

Optimizes individual and team productivity using Csikszentmihalyi's flow state framework, covering the conditions for flow (clear goals, immediate feedback, challenge-skill balance), the four-stage flow cycle, and organizational flow design. Use when auditing personal or team focus time, diagnosing productivity loss…

fatihguner/foreman · 96 tokens

stoic-right-action

Applies Stoic ethics of right action to entrepreneurial decision-making, covering the four cardinal virtues (courage, justice, temperance, wisdom), ethical leadership under pressure, and the discipline of choosing the harder right over the easier wrong. Use when facing ethical dilemmas in business, building a…

fatihguner/foreman · 89 tokens

bakeoff

Turn one decision into a judged tournament of solutions, then pick the best. Given a problem, design choice, or a suggestion you want cross-verified, it generates diverse candidate solutions, auto-derives the evaluation dimensions for THAT problem (so you don't have to know what to score on), judges every candidate…

CoriChui/bakeoff · 330 tokens

balanced-scorecard

Translate strategy into metrics across Financial, Customer, Internal Process, and Learning & Growth perspectives.

tupe12334/instinct · 22 tokens

customer-journey-map

Visualize every touchpoint a customer has with a product or service — stages, actions, emotions, pain points, opportunities.

tupe12334/instinct · 31 tokens