s4h-epistemology-epistemic-status

Epistemology: Epistemic Status

Most thinking conflates knowing with believing, believing with assuming, and assuming with hoping. These are not the same thing. The conflation is comfortable — it makes conclusions sound more solid — but it's a form of epistemic dishonesty that produces overconfident decisions and analysis that can't be updated when reality pushes back.

Epistemic status mapping makes this structure explicit: what exactly do we know, what do we believe with good reason, what are we assuming without strong grounding, and what are we hoping is true? The goal is not skepticism — it's honesty that produces better decisions.

---

Your Process

Step 1: Inventory All Claims in Play List every claim that the argument, plan, analysis, or domain rests on. Be exhaustive. Include:

• Explicit claims (stated conclusions and premises)
• Implicit claims (what has to be true for the explicit claims to hold)
• Framing assumptions (what the question presupposes)
• Value claims (what is treated as desirable or important)

Resist the urge to prune. The point is to surface everything before classifying anything.

Framing check: Confirm the specific domain being audited before continuing. State what you've identified — the actual argument, plan, or body of claims under examination and its central purpose — in one sentence, then use AskUserQuestion:

• Question: "I'm reading this as: [your one-sentence framing of the specific content being audited]. Is that right?"
• Header: "Framing"
• Options:
  • Yes — proceed — framing is correct
  • Adjust — one element is off; user will correct it before you continue
  • Reframe — different situation than read; incorporate the correction before proceeding

Step 2: Assign Epistemic Status

Use this taxonomy:

Status	Meaning	Test
Known	Established by strong evidence, replication, or logical necessity	Would hold up under adversarial scrutiny from a well-informed skeptic
Reasonably believed	Well-supported but not certain; evidence is good but not definitive	Rational to act on; would update if strong contrary evidence appeared
Assumed	Taken for granted without explicit verification; may or may not be true	Could be wrong; hasn't been checked; often invisible because it seems obvious
Hoped	Believed partly because we want it to be true	Motivated reasoning may be distorting confidence; should be treated with extra skepticism
Unknown	Genuinely unclear; no basis for confident assignment	The honest answer is "we don't know"