scoping-argument-boundary

scoping-argument-boundary is a skill for Claude Code from icerain-cmd/humanities-superpowers. It costs 39 tokens per session (1,927 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A method for narrowing a humanities research question into a defined corpus, period, comparison, and claim. Humanities research studies people, culture, history, language, and creative works.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to set inclusion and exclusion rules, define a workable body of sources, choose among narrow or broad project scopes, and state the strongest defensible claim.
Why use it?
It prevents a promising question from becoming too broad or from making claims larger than the available evidence can support.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the humanities-superpowers plugin — 14 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to set inclusion and exclusion rules, define a workable body of sources, choose among narrow or broad project scopes, and state the strongest defensible claim.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/icerain-cmd/humanities-superpowers/scoping-argument-boundary
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add icerain-cmd/humanities-superpowers --skill scoping-argument-boundary
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/icerain-cmd/humanities-superpowers

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install humanities-superpowers, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 14 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for scoping-argument-boundary

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/icerain-cmd/humanities-superpowers/scoping-argument-boundary/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/icerain-cmd/humanities-superpowers/scoping-argument-boundary)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/icerain-cmd/humanities-superpowers/scoping-argument-boundary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/icerain-cmd/humanities-superpowers/scoping-argument-boundary/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for scoping-argument-boundary

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/icerain-cmd/humanities-superpowers/scoping-argument-boundary"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/icerain-cmd/humanities-superpowers/scoping-argument-boundary.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 39 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,927 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00039 $0.01927
Opus 5 $0.00019 $0.00963
Sonnet 5 $0.00008 $0.00385
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00193

Measured 9d ago against content hash 3e7cb5120c8a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

scoping-argument-boundary scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/scoping-argument-boundary/SKILL.md · 243 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 243 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Scoping an Argument Boundary

Purpose

Convert a promising research question into a bounded inquiry by defining what the argument includes, excludes, compares, and refuses to claim. The skill prevents scale inflation and protects the manuscript from drifting between incompatible objects or levels of analysis.

Contract

Accepts

  • A ResearchQuestion record or clearly stated primary question.
  • Candidate corpus, archive, period, geography, language, medium, or conceptual field.
  • Known venue, deadline, length, and access constraints.

Requires

  • A stable primary question.
  • At least one candidate unit of analysis.
  • Enough project context to identify feasible exclusions.

Produces

  • One ScopeBoundary record.
  • Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
  • A bounded corpus statement.
  • A claim ceiling defining the strongest claim the evidence could support.
  • A scope gate report.

May produce

  • Alternative narrow, moderate, and expansive scope options.
  • A deferred-research list for valuable material excluded from the present project.

Fails when

  • The primary question is still circular or indeterminate.
  • The researcher refuses necessary exclusions.
  • The proposed evidence cannot support the desired level of generalization.
  • The project combines multiple independent studies without a governing relation.

Guarantees

  • The output will make exclusions and claim limits explicit.
  • Corpus boundaries and units of analysis will be recorded in a form usable by downstream skills.
  • Excluded materials will not be treated as silently analyzed.

Does not guarantee

  • That the selected scope is the most original or publishable one.
  • That all included materials can be obtained or interpreted successfully.

When to use

Use after a primary research question has been selected and before extensive literature accumulation or prose drafting. Use when a project contains too many theorists, periods, media, national contexts, or corpora; when the abstract promises more than the evidence can sustain; or when the unit of analysis shifts from text to discourse to society without explanation.

Read the full file on GitHub · 243 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 243 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 3e7cb5120c8a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

scoping-argument-boundary is a skill published in the GitHub repository icerain-cmd/humanities-superpowers (16 stars, last pushed 19d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 1,927 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

quantum-qiskit

Reference qiskit 2.x patterns for variational quantum machine learning. Covers data-encoding feature maps, variational quantum classifier (VQC) training, variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) for chemistry, matrix-product-state circuits, and noise model integration. Use when writing Python code that imports qiskit…

aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw · 102 tokens

fba-simulator

Run Flux Balance Analysis (FBA) and related constraint-based simulations using COBRApy. Covers standard FBA, parsimonious FBA (pFBA), Flux Variability Analysis (FVA), loopless FBA, gene/reaction knockouts, and carbon source swapping. Outputs flux distributions and CSV files.

aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw · 69 tokens

gsmm-validator

Validate a COBRApy genome-scale metabolic model for mass/charge balance, stoichiometric consistency, biomass producibility, dead-end metabolites, thermodynamic loops, and GPR rule formatting. Outputs a structured validation report with errors and warnings.

aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw · 52 tokens

metabolic-study-planner

Plan publishable constraint-based metabolic modelling studies when the user has a broad biological or metabolic-engineering topic but no concrete dataset, organism, model, or hypothesis. Selects feasible BiGG/COBRA models, objectives, perturbations, analyses, metrics, figures, and risk controls before FBA code is…

aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw · 69 tokens

stat-research-orchestrator

Orchestrate a statistical research pipeline centered on formal problem formulation, method proposal, theoretical analysis, experimental evaluation, comparison, and final result synthesis.

aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw · 36 tokens

gsmm-builder

Build or load a genome-scale metabolic model (GSMM) using COBRApy. Covers loading from BIGG, constructing minimal models from scratch, setting medium constraints, and exporting validated .json model files.

aiming-lab/AutoResearchClaw · 45 tokens