Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add IdoCohen560/claude-unity-game-studio --skill architecture-decisiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IdoCohen560/claude-unity-game-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/architecture-decision)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/architecture-decision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/architecture-decision/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/architecture-decision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/architecture-decision.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.04506 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02253 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00901 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00451 |
Grade A, and why
architecture-decision scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to architecture-decision — 37 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 456 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When this skill is invoked:
0. Parse Arguments — Detect Retrofit Mode
Resolve the review mode (once, store for all gate spawns this run):
- If
--review [full|lean|solo]was passed → use that - Else read
production/review-mode.txt→ use that value - Else → default to
lean
See .claude/docs/director-gates.md for the full check pattern.
If the argument starts with retrofit followed by a file path
(e.g., /architecture-decision retrofit docs/architecture/adr-0001-event-system.md):
Enter retrofit mode:
- Read the existing ADR file completely.
- Identify which template sections are present by scanning headings:
## Status— BLOCKING if missing:/story-readinesscannot check ADR acceptance## ADR Dependencies— HIGH if missing: dependency ordering breaks## Engine Compatibility— HIGH if missing: post-cutoff risk unknown## GDD Requirements Addressed— MEDIUM if missing: traceability lost
- Present to the user:
## Retrofit: [ADR title] File: [path] Sections already present (will not be touched): ✓ Status: [current value, or "MISSING — will add"] ✓ [section] Missing sections to add: ✗ Status — BLOCKING (stories cannot validate ADR acceptance without this) ✗ ADR Dependencies — HIGH ✗ Engine Compatibility — HIGH - Ask: "Shall I add the [N] missing sections? I will not modify any existing content."
- If yes:
- For Status: ask the user — "What is the current status of this decision?" Options: "Proposed", "Accepted", "Deprecated", "Superseded by ADR-XXXX"
- For ADR Dependencies: ask — "Does this decision depend on any other ADR? Does it enable or block any other ADR or epic?" Accept "None" for each field.
- For Engine Compatibility: read the engine reference docs (same as Step 0 below) and ask the user to confirm the domain. Then generate the table with verified data.
- For GDD Requirements Addressed: ask — "Which GDD systems motivated this decision? What specific requirement in each GDD does this ADR address?"
- Append each missing section to the ADR file using the Edit tool.
- Never modify any existing section. Only append or fill absent sections.
- After adding all missing sections, update the ADR's
## Datefield if it is absent. - Suggest: "Run
/architecture-reviewto re-validate coverage now that this ADR has its Status and Dependencies fields."
If NOT in retrofit mode, proceed to Step 0 below (normal ADR authoring).
No-argument guard: If no argument was provided (title is empty), ask before running Phase 0:
"What technical decision are you documenting? Please provide a short title (e.g.,
event-system-architecture,physics-engine-choice)."
Use the user's response as the title, then proceed to Step 0.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 456 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 25328cfe4e3b
architecture-decision is a skill published in the GitHub repository IdoCohen560/claude-unity-game-studio (19 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 4,506 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to architecture-decision, differing in 37 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
swarm
Run a multi-agent audit of a codebase by spawning specialized parallel subagents (security, performance, tests, architecture, dead-code), then synthesize their findings into a single prioritized action plan. Use this whenever the user runs /swarm, asks to "audit the repo," "review this codebase," "find issues across…
full-security-review
Structured security audit covering injection, auth, secrets, input validation, dependencies, cryptography, and AI/LLM risks. Produces severity-graded findings.
log-correlation
Correlates and troubleshoots logs across OS (Linux/macOS), AWS (CloudWatch, CloudTrail, ALB, Lambda), application (JSON, logfmt), and web servers (Nginx, Apache).
accessibility
Audits code for WCAG 2.2 AA compliance and provides design guidance for accessible components. Covers semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard nav, contrast, focus management, and motion.
git-workflow
Enforces the release-branch Git model: scaffold feature branches, open PRs with review checks, cut releases with tags, and view workflow reference.
mvp-readiness
Runs a structured MVP quality-gate audit covering stability, security, logging, docs, and implementation integrity. Reports pass/fail with evidence.