Claude Code Game Studios is a setup that organizes Claude Code into a coordinated game-development team of specialized AI agents. It supports game projects across design, programming, art, audio, narrative, quality assurance, and production, with skills and workflows for coordinating that work.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios --skill architecture-decisiongit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-StudiosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios/architecture-decision)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios/architecture-decision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/donchitos/claude-code-game-studios/architecture-decision.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.04513 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.02256 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00903 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00451 |
Grade A, and why
architecture-decision scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
5 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- architecture-decision — 95% identical, 37 lines differ
- architecture-decision — 95% identical, 57 lines differ
- architecture-decision — 95% identical, 37 lines differ
- architecture-decision — 91% identical, 9 lines differ
- architecture-decision — 84% identical, 54 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 457 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
When this skill is invoked:
0. Parse Arguments — Detect Retrofit Mode
Resolve the review mode (once, store for all gate spawns this run):
- If
--review [full|lean|solo]was passed → use that - Else read
production/review-mode.txt→ use that value - Else → default to
lean
See .claude/docs/director-gates.md for the full check pattern.
If the argument starts with retrofit followed by a file path
(e.g., /architecture-decision retrofit docs/architecture/adr-0001-event-system.md):
Enter retrofit mode:
- Read the existing ADR file completely.
- Identify which template sections are present by scanning headings:
## Status— BLOCKING if missing:/story-readinesscannot check ADR acceptance## ADR Dependencies— HIGH if missing: dependency ordering breaks## Engine Compatibility— HIGH if missing: post-cutoff risk unknown## GDD Requirements Addressed— MEDIUM if missing: traceability lost
- Present to the user:
## Retrofit: [ADR title] File: [path] Sections already present (will not be touched): ✓ Status: [current value, or "MISSING — will add"] ✓ [section] Missing sections to add: ✗ Status — BLOCKING (stories cannot validate ADR acceptance without this) ✗ ADR Dependencies — HIGH ✗ Engine Compatibility — HIGH - Ask: "Shall I add the [N] missing sections? I will not modify any existing content."
- If yes:
- For Status: ask the user — "What is the current status of this decision?" Options: "Proposed", "Accepted", "Deprecated", "Superseded by ADR-XXXX"
- For ADR Dependencies: ask — "Does this decision depend on any other ADR? Does it enable or block any other ADR or epic?" Accept "None" for each field.
- For Engine Compatibility: read the engine reference docs (same as Step 1 below) and ask the user to confirm the domain. Then generate the table with verified data.
- For GDD Requirements Addressed: ask — "Which GDD systems motivated this decision? What specific requirement in each GDD does this ADR address?"
- Append each missing section to the ADR file using the Edit tool.
- Never modify any existing section. Only append or fill absent sections.
- After adding all missing sections, update the ADR's
## Datefield if it is absent. - Suggest: "Run
/architecture-reviewto re-validate coverage now that this ADR has its Status and Dependencies fields."
If NOT in retrofit mode, proceed to Step 1 below (normal ADR authoring).
No-argument guard: If no argument was provided (title is empty), ask before running Phase 0:
"What technical decision are you documenting? Please provide a short title (e.g.,
event-system-architecture,physics-engine-choice)."
Use the user's response as the title, then proceed to Step 1.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 457 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 94a2299ae4ff
architecture-decision is a skill published in the GitHub repository Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios (24,838 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 4,513 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-dev
Use this skill when creating or refining Claude Code skill definitions. Skills are model-invoked capabilities that Claude activates autonomously based on context. Helps design focused skills with discovery-optimized descriptions, proper directory structures, and supporting resources. Automatically invoked when user…
command-dev
Use this skill when creating or refining custom Claude Code slash commands. Slash commands are user-invoked reusable prompts that can accept arguments, reference files, and execute bash operations. Helps design command syntax, argument handling, file references, bash execution, and frontmatter configuration.…
mcp-tool-dev
Create MCP tools — individual tool functions exposed via Model Context Protocol. Use this skill whenever users mention MCP tools, tool handlers, tool functions, tool definitions, or want to add capabilities to an MCP server. Also use when the conversation involves designing tool schemas, writing tool descriptions, or…
forward-derivation
Derive BDD scenarios and TDD test skeletons from approved SDD specifications. ATDD acceptance test tables are optional output for specialized needs. Use when: spec is approved, starting BDD/TDD implementation, generating test structures. Keywords: forward derivation, spec to test, BDD generation, TDD skeleton, test…
checkin-assistant
A checklist for the steps before making a Git commit. It treats a commit as one complete, reversible unit of work that should leave the codebase working.
reverse-engineer
A guide for examining existing software and turning what it does into specification documents. Specification-driven development means writing an agreed description of a system before changing it.