Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add IdoCohen560/claude-unity-game-studio --skill balance-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IdoCohen560/claude-unity-game-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/balance-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/balance-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/balance-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/balance-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/balance-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00061 | $0.00903 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00451 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00181 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00090 |
Grade A, and why
balance-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- balance-check — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 119 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Phase 1: Identify Balance Domain
Determine the balance domain from $ARGUMENTS[0]:
- Combat → weapon/ability DPS, time-to-kill, damage type interactions
- Economy → resource faucets/sinks, acquisition rates, item pricing
- Progression → XP/power curves, dead zones, power spikes
- Loot → rarity distribution, pity timers, inventory pressure
- File path given → load that file directly and infer domain from content
If no argument, ask the user which system to check.
Phase 2: Read Data Files
Read relevant files from assets/data/ and design/balance/ for the identified domain.
Note every file read — they will appear in the Data Sources section of the report.
Phase 3: Read Design Document
Read the GDD for the system from design/gdd/ to understand intended design targets,
tuning knobs, and expected value ranges. This is the baseline for "correct" behaviour.
Phase 4: Perform Analysis
Run domain-specific checks:
Combat balance:
- Calculate DPS for all weapons/abilities at each power tier
- Check time-to-kill at each tier
- Identify any options that dominate all others (strictly better)
- Check if defensive options can create unkillable states
- Verify damage type/resistance interactions are balanced
Economy balance:
- Map all resource faucets and sinks with flow rates
- Project resource accumulation over time
- Check for infinite resource loops
- Verify gold sinks scale with gold generation
- Check if any items are never worth purchasing
Progression balance:
- Plot the XP curve and power curve
- Check for dead zones (no meaningful progression for too long)
- Check for power spikes (sudden jumps in capability)
- Verify content gates align with expected player power
- Check if skip/grind strategies break intended pacing
Loot balance:
- Calculate expected time to acquire each rarity tier
- Check pity timer math
- Verify no loot is strictly useless at any stage
- Check inventory pressure vs acquisition rate
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 119 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 84d6a58cddb1
balance-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository IdoCohen560/claude-unity-game-studio (19 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 61 tokens to every session and 903 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
swarm
Run a multi-agent audit of a codebase by spawning specialized parallel subagents (security, performance, tests, architecture, dead-code), then synthesize their findings into a single prioritized action plan. Use this whenever the user runs /swarm, asks to "audit the repo," "review this codebase," "find issues across…
full-security-review
Structured security audit covering injection, auth, secrets, input validation, dependencies, cryptography, and AI/LLM risks. Produces severity-graded findings.
log-correlation
Correlates and troubleshoots logs across OS (Linux/macOS), AWS (CloudWatch, CloudTrail, ALB, Lambda), application (JSON, logfmt), and web servers (Nginx, Apache).
accessibility
Audits code for WCAG 2.2 AA compliance and provides design guidance for accessible components. Covers semantic HTML, ARIA, keyboard nav, contrast, focus management, and motion.
git-workflow
Enforces the release-branch Git model: scaffold feature branches, open PRs with review checks, cut releases with tags, and view workflow reference.
mvp-readiness
Runs a structured MVP quality-gate audit covering stability, security, logging, docs, and implementation integrity. Reports pass/fail with evidence.