Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add IdoCohen560/claude-unity-game-studio --skill team-live-opsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IdoCohen560/claude-unity-game-studioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/team-live-ops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/team-live-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/team-live-ops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/team-live-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/idocohen560/claude-unity-game-studio/team-live-ops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.01955 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00978 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00391 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00196 |
Grade A, and why
team-live-ops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to team-live-ops — 18 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Argument check: If no season name or event description is provided, output:
"Usage:
/team-live-ops [season name or event description]— Provide the name or description of the season or live event to plan." Then stop immediately without spawning any subagents or reading any files.
When this skill is invoked with a valid argument, orchestrate the live-ops team through a structured planning pipeline.
Decision Points: At each phase transition, use AskUserQuestion to present
the user with the subagent's proposals as selectable options. Write the agent's
full analysis in conversation, then capture the decision with concise labels.
The user must approve before moving to the next phase.
Team Composition
- live-ops-designer — Season structure, event cadence, retention mechanics, battle pass
- economy-designer — Live economy balance, store rotation, currency pricing, pity timers
- analytics-engineer — Success metrics, A/B test design, event tracking, dashboard specs
- community-manager — Player-facing announcements, event descriptions, seasonal messaging
- narrative-director — Seasonal narrative theme, story arc, world event framing
- writer — Event descriptions, reward item names, seasonal flavor text, announcement copy
How to Delegate
Use the Task tool to spawn each team member as a subagent:
subagent_type: live-ops-designer— Season/event structure and retention mechanicssubagent_type: economy-designer— Live economy balance and reward pricingsubagent_type: analytics-engineer— Success metrics, A/B tests, event instrumentationsubagent_type: community-manager— Player-facing communication and messagingsubagent_type: narrative-director— Seasonal theme and narrative framingsubagent_type: writer— All player-facing text: event descriptions, item names, copy
Always provide full context in each agent's prompt (game concept path, existing season docs, ethics policy path, current economy state). Launch independent agents in parallel where the pipeline allows it (Phases 3 and 4 can run simultaneously).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 146 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 322b6484e54a
team-live-ops is a skill published in the GitHub repository IdoCohen560/claude-unity-game-studio (18 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 1,955 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to team-live-ops, differing in 18 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
swarm
Run a multi-agent audit of a codebase by spawning specialized parallel subagents (security, performance, tests, architecture, dead-code), then synthesize their findings into a single prioritized action plan. Use this whenever the user runs /swarm, asks to "audit the repo," "review this codebase," "find issues across…
memory-loop-setup
Bootstrap the memory loop into any repo or Obsidian vault. Triggers: (1) "set up the memory loop / second brain / warm layer here" or "install this structure in another repo/vault", (2) a new project asking "make the AI remember across sessions and surfaces".
discord-intent-application
Helps write the justification text for Discord Developer Portal privileged intent applications (Message Content, Server Members, Presence) for a specific bot. Takes a plain-text description of the bot's functionality and/or an uploaded/local codebase, screens the bot's features against Discord's known rejection…
plan-qa
Post-implementation QA planning — independent of /review (the developer chooses whether to run them sequentially or in parallel), only when the change has a running surface worth driving. Interviews the developer to turn the specs and the diff into an executable QA specification (specs/qa/QA- - .md) that /execute-qa…
review
Phase 5 of 5 — triage-first review orchestrator; dispatches up to 17 domain checks in parallel and compiles one report. Use only when the user asks to run Phase 5 or review a PR, branch, or set of changes — never trigger automatically after writing code.
execute-qa
Executes a QA specification (specs/qa/QA- - .md) written by /plan-qa: drives every step with the plan's drivers, verifies each Expected line mechanically ([assert]) or by evidence-backed judgment against the plan's written criterion ([judge]), pauses at named operator handoffs, and writes the results artifact…