Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to isair/jarvis. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/isair/jarvis/main/.agents/skills/review-pr/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/isair/jarvisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/isair/jarvis/review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isair/jarvis/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isair/jarvis/review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isair/jarvis/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isair/jarvis/review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.01359 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00028 | $0.00544 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00272 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed b5f8a628be9e
- 2mo ago First seen · 176 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A f25ae451ed74
review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository isair/jarvis (2,149 stars, last pushed 8d ago), with no licence file. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 1,359 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
claude_code_delegation
Delegate coding, review, and refactor tasks to Claude Code CLI through Row-Bot's approval-gated shell workflow.
developer_pr_prep
Prepare branches, diffs, tests, and GitHub PR text from a conversation's code folder.
developer_review
Code-review workflow for repositories in a conversation's code folder.
nightly-audit-engineer-getting-started
A first-conversation guide for setting up a code-audit assistant. A code audit is a focused review of source code for defects or risky behavior, with the needed repository, scope, concerns, permissions, and schedule clarified first.
engineer-bot-evidence
A local checker for confirming that delivery checks and supporting evidence belong to the current software version. It does not contact Git, continuous-integration systems, or the internet.
code-review
Comprehensive code review assistant that analyzes code quality, security, and best practices.