Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to isair/jarvis. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/isair/jarvis/main/.claude/skills/review-pr/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/isair/jarvisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/isair/jarvis/review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isair/jarvis/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isair/jarvis/review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/isair/jarvis/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/isair/jarvis/review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00070 | $0.01361 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00035 | $0.00681 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00272 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00136 |
Grade A, and why
review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 176 lines · 70 tokens per session scan A f25ae451ed74
review-pr is a skill published in the GitHub repository isair/jarvis (1,740 stars, last pushed 16d ago), with no licence file. It adds 70 tokens to every session and 1,361 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
claude_code_delegation
Delegate coding, review, and refactor tasks to Claude Code CLI through Row-Bot's approval-gated shell workflow.
oracle
Oracle CLI second-model review/debug/refactor/design with selected files, dry-run token checks, API or browser engine.
developer_pr_prep
Prepare branches, diffs, tests, and GitHub PR text from Developer Studio.
developer_review
Code-review workflow for Developer Studio repositories.
code-review
Reviews code for quality issues, security vulnerabilities, performance problems, and best practices. Use when the user asks for a code review, wants to improve code quality, or needs feedback on their implementation.
code-review
Reviews code diffs and files for security vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10), error handling, complexity, naming conventions, and performance issues. Use when the user asks to review a PR, pull request, diff, merge request, or code changes.