multica-pm-requirement-spec

multica-pm-requirement-spec is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from it235/multica-best-practices. It costs 34 tokens per session (252 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A requirement-clarification tool that turns an issue into a defined engineering task. It records the goal, scope, exclusions, constraints, dependencies, acceptance checks, and unanswered questions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to prepare actionable tasks and stop for clarification when an ambiguity could change the implementation.
Why use it?
It exposes unclear requirements before developers start, reducing different people making different assumptions.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to prepare actionable tasks and stop for clarification when an ambiguity could change the implementation.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-pm-requirement-spec
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add it235/multica-best-practices --skill multica-pm-requirement-spec
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/it235/multica-best-practices

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for multica-pm-requirement-spec

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-pm-requirement-spec/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-pm-requirement-spec)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-pm-requirement-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-pm-requirement-spec/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for multica-pm-requirement-spec

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-pm-requirement-spec"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/it235/multica-best-practices/multica-pm-requirement-spec.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 34 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 252 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00034 $0.00252
Opus 5.5 $0.00014 $0.00101
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00007 $0.00050
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00025

Measured 1mo ago against content hash d70b9424dd9b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

multica-pm-requirement-spec scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

templates/en_US/skills/product-manager/multica-pm-requirement-spec/SKILL.md · 45 lines

What it actually says

Requirement Analysis

Purpose

Turn an Issue into a clear, actionable engineering task.

Process

  1. Identify the business goal.
  2. Identify the expected behavior.
  3. Identify the explicit scope.
  4. Identify the non-goals.
  5. Identify the constraints.
  6. Identify the acceptance criteria.
  7. Identify ambiguities.
  8. Identify dependencies.

Output

  • Goal: what problem to solve
  • Scope: what will change
  • Non-goals: what explicitly won't change
  • Acceptance criteria: testable check items
  • Constraints: compatibility / performance / security / time
  • Dependencies: prerequisites
  • Open questions: items needing clarification

Rule

Don't silently digest ambiguous requirements.

If an ambiguity would materially affect the implementation:

→ BLOCKED → Ask for clarification.

Why this works

Ambiguity at the requirement stage gets amplified at every later stage. Blocking ambiguity with BLOCKED is far cheaper than letting 5 Agents each guess differently.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 45 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A d70b9424dd9b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

multica-pm-requirement-spec is a skill published in the GitHub repository it235/multica-best-practices (212 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 34 tokens to every session and 252 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-11.