Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add itarunnn/jp-lit-mcp --skill jp-lit-iiifgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/itarunnn/jp-lit-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/itarunnn/jp-lit-mcp/jp-lit-iiif)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/itarunnn/jp-lit-mcp/jp-lit-iiif"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/itarunnn/jp-lit-mcp/jp-lit-iiif/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/itarunnn/jp-lit-mcp/jp-lit-iiif"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/itarunnn/jp-lit-mcp/jp-lit-iiif.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00044 | $0.00970 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00018 | $0.00388 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
jp-lit-iiif scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
IIIF資料の比較と画像読解
選んだ資料のページ・矩形をローカル比較画面で記録し、画像と出典を既存AIアプリへ渡す。CLI呼び出し、要求JSON、再開、テキスト併読はworkflowを必要な段階で読む。
通常の依頼例は「選択した2画像を比べ、見える違いと翻刻候補を出典付きで示す」。資料探索が必要なら既存jp-litの検索・詳細からmanifest候補を選ぶ。国書DBはsource_metadata.manifest_url、Japan Searchはsource_metadata.iiif_url、NDLの公開PID由来URLは取得まで候補として扱う。
読解はevidence.jsonと実際に開けた画像を入力とする。各観察・翻刻候補・解釈へevidence_idを付け、疑義とai_candidate状態をanalysis.json / analysis.mdへ保存する。原テキストは元のまま保持し、候補と校合記録を別に残す。画像未取得の領域はテキスト／metadataの読解範囲を示す。
既存テキストがあれば画像と併読する。細字の疑義が残る場合は必要な範囲を選び直す。TEI画像対応はCLIのhelpにlink_teiがある0.18.0以降の版で使う。固定XMLの原構造・hash・locatorを保持し、画像への対応と本文校合を別に記録する。詳細はworkflowのTEI連携を読む。
ローカルくずし字OCRはhelpにrun_ocrがある版で、標準の任意engineにNDL古典籍OCR-Liteを使う。導入済みDockerの古典籍OCR ver.3も追加providerとして選べる。workflowのOCR連携でproviderの固定、実行、import、失敗時の原出力保全を確認する。OCR原文・修訂候補・校合記録を分け、機械出力から校合済みへ自動昇格させない。engine未導入なら同梱OCR導入・評価手順を読む。KuroNetは手動補助を使い、貼付候補の評価でもサービス入力画像hashとモデル版の不明状態を保持する。公開OCRサービスや外部モデルへの自動接続は、利用者による明示設定と資料別許可を具体化する後続段階である。
読解結果の確認にはworkspaceを再開し、同じ領域IDの「元の場所へ戻る」を使う。機械読解の完了と原資料との照合を別の状態として報告する。
ローカルOCRと同じ画像を利用中AIアプリで読む場合は、helpにprepare_reading／import_readingがある版でAI読解の取込を使う。画像のみとOCR併用を区別し、疑義・実見申告・人／AIの確認を出典付き候補へ保持する。
保存済み図版の位置合わせ・差分には、helpにcompare_images／import_comparisonがある版で図版比較を使う。図版の矩形を選び、任意のローカルengineで解析する。候補順位・整列成立・図版対応の確認・文字校合を分ける。新しい操作は0.18.0以降の固定版CLIを使う。開発checkoutはbuild後に使う。0.17.0は初版の比較・書き出しまで。
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago Changed · +6 lines · +10 tokens per session eb845758ec84
- 12d ago First seen · 19 lines · 34 tokens per session scan A f915ad315c93
jp-lit-iiif is a skill published in the GitHub repository itarunnn/jp-lit-mcp (7 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 970 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
evidence-table
Compare several sources in the user's Zotero library on one research question, write a cited literature review, or audit a draft's citations, backed by passages retrieved from the PDFs. Use when the user asks to compare studies, synthesize what their papers say about a topic, build an evidence or literature table, or…
verifying-proofs
Use when checking the mathematics of a paper rather than its claims — verifying a theorem's proof, an algebraic derivation, a bound, or an appendix full of lemmas. Triggers on "check this proof", "verify the derivation", "is Lemma 3 correct", "does the algebra work", a paper directory containing theorem/proof…
running-cluster-experiments
Use when planning, budgeting, submitting or resuming a multi-job experiment campaign on a Slurm/HPC cluster — sizing walltime, shaping jobs and arrays, deciding what to submit first, or after a job hit its walltime, produced no results, silently ran the wrong configuration, or got the wrong number of GPUs.
explaining-derivations
Use when a proof or derivation needs to be made explicit step by step — expanding a paper's algebra for a reader without formal mathematical training, producing a worked companion document, or establishing whether a derivation can be justified at all. Triggers on "explain this derivation", "walk me through this…
self-surveying-literature
Audit a research paper draft (LaTeX sources + .bib) for related work it should cite but does not, above all close prior work that undermines its novelty claims. Searches Semantic Scholar, arXiv, DBLP and Crossref, follows citation graphs, verifies every hit, and produces a prioritized, evidence-backed report plus…
proofreading-paper-writing
Use when asked to proofread, polish, or critique the writing of an academic paper from its LaTeX sources — grammar and mechanics, sentence clarity and style, paragraph flow, terminology and framing — and deliver the proposals as coloured track changes with margin comments plus a numbered writing report. Triggers on…