Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add IvanLutsenko/awac-ai-agent-plugins --skill decision-newgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/IvanLutsenko/awac-ai-agent-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivanlutsenko/awac-ai-agent-plugins/decision-new)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivanlutsenko/awac-ai-agent-plugins/decision-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ivanlutsenko/awac-ai-agent-plugins/decision-new/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ivanlutsenko/awac-ai-agent-plugins/decision-new"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ivanlutsenko/awac-ai-agent-plugins/decision-new.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00404 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00162 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00081 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00040 |
Grade A, and why
obsidian-tracker-decision-new scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Converted from Claude Code command
/decision-new. Review and adapt: hooks and MCP tool IDs may need manual mapping for Codex.
/decision-new — Create Decision
Steps
-
Determine project:
- If
.claude/obsidian-tracking.jsonexists, use the project from it. - Otherwise, call
findProjectByLocalPathwith cwd. - If still no project, ask the user.
- If
-
Collect decision info:
- If the user provided a description in the command argument, extract title/context/decision/consequences from it.
- Otherwise ask via
AskUserQuestion:- Title — short name for the decision
- Context — what problem or situation led to this decision?
- Decision — what was decided?
- Consequences — what are the trade-offs?
-
Check for related entities:
- If tracking is active, check if current work relates to tasks or bugs.
- Offer to link them (optional).
-
Create the decision:
- Call
addDecisionwith all collected info.
- Call
-
Update tracking:
- If
.claude/obsidian-tracking.jsonexists, add "📋 Decision DEC-{id}: {title}" to actions.
- If
-
Confirm with the decision ID and a brief summary.
Codex differences
- A non-interactive run (
codex exec, CI) has nobody to answer a prompt: continue on defaults, honour whatever the invoking prompt already specified, and report which defaults were used. If the whole point of the command is to ask, say that it needs an interactive session and stop rather than inventing answers.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago Changed · +4 lines c00337370847
- 1mo ago First seen · 38 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 73c901334604
obsidian-tracker-decision-new is a skill published in the GitHub repository IvanLutsenko/awac-ai-agent-plugins (3 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 404 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Checks whether a story is ready to implement: clear acceptance criteria, no open questions, valid ADR and dependencies. Use when the user asks if a story, or the sprint's stories, are ready to start or build.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
projects
List all managed projects with status, branch, open PRs, and open issue counts — portfolio-level view.
qa-project-bootstrap
Onboard a new QA engineer to an existing codebase, or audit an existing test architecture. Produces a 30-day ramp plan: codebase orientation, framework walkthrough, test architecture audit, mentorship pairing, and first-test guidance. Use when: "QA onboarding," "new tester," "ramp up," "test architecture audit,"…