Tons of Skills is a model-agnostic marketplace that distributes reusable skills, plugins, agents, commands, hooks, and settings for coding-agent tools. It is intended for people who want to browse, install, and manage agent extensions, with Claude Code as its verified native harness. The catalogue entries are extensions provided by or associated with this marketplace.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace --skill hyperflow-deploygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplaceWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/hyperflow-deploy)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/hyperflow-deploy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/hyperflow-deploy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/hyperflow-deploy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace/hyperflow-deploy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 20 Tool parameters are crafted to achieve unintended or unsafe behavior. Parameter abuse can bypass intended safety checks (e.g. shell=True, --force, dangerous glob patterns).Fix: Validate all tool parameters against an allowlist. Reject dangerous parameter values (shell=True, --force, -rf /) and use safe defaults.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00075 | $0.00370 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00185 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00074 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
hyperflow-deploy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
hyperflow-deploy — ship phase (Antigravity single-agent)
Gate, then ship. Follow the hyperflow doctrine. Pushing is always an explicit, confirmed step.
Steps
- Pre-push gates — run in order, fix or halt on failure:
- lint · typecheck · build · tests · a quick security sweep (no secrets in the diff, no blocked files committed).
- Report the gate results in one short block (pass/fail per gate).
- Push gate via AskUserQuestion — binary
Push / Hold(no recommended marker). State the branch, ahead/behind vs the remote, and any caveat (e.g. red gate from someone else's files). - On Push:
git pushthe branch (never--forcetomain/master). On Hold: leave commits local and say so.
Hard rules
- Never
git push --no-verify. If a pre-push hook fails — even on files you don't own — surface it and hold; do not bypass. - Never force-push to
main/master. - If a gate is red because of a concurrent session's uncommitted/untracked files, report that the push is held on external failure — your commits stay clean and local until the tree is green.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 23 lines · 75 tokens per session scan A 2f8399b5ea0f
hyperflow-deploy is a skill published in the GitHub repository jeremylongshore/tons-of-skills-marketplace (2,717 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 75 tokens to every session and 370 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
verify-implementation
A workflow that runs a project’s verification skills to produce a report on coding patterns, architecture rules, and project conventions. It is intended for work after implementation, before a pull request, or during code review.
red-team-review
Unified adversarial review: v4.3 Strategic Matrix (MTA-004). 7-phase framework: Priors → Rubric → Adversarial Lenses → SWOT/TOWS → MCDA Decision Engine → Blind Spot/Kill Switch → Executive Summary. Absorbs: bias-detector.
codex-loop
Fix Elixir/Phoenix code until Codex CLI review comes back clean — bounded review, fix, verify loop before opening a PR. Use when codex is installed and you want an external cross-model critic on your changes before pushing.
codex-ab
Run an A/B codex review experiment — holistic codex review vs 3 focused dimension passes (security, ecto, liveview) on the branch diff, classify findings, report a panel-value verdict. Use when the branch is fresh, before any codex review runs.
include-test-files-that-assert-on-behavior-being-changed-in-decl
When delegating a task affected by this skill, include.
magpie-pr-management-quick-merge
Identify trivial, low-risk pull requests in the ready for maintainer review queue of that pass every quality gate and touch only supplementary areas (docs, changelog, translations, tests) — the "express lane" a maintainer can review and merge in seconds. Surfaces and ranks candidates with per-PR diff summaries, an…