Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add jjmartres/ai-coding-agents --skill work-on-ticketgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jjmartres/ai-coding-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jjmartres/ai-coding-agents/work-on-ticket)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jjmartres/ai-coding-agents/work-on-ticket"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jjmartres/ai-coding-agents/work-on-ticket.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00041 | $0.02265 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01132 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00453 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00227 |
Grade A, and why
work-on-ticket scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 345 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Work on Ticket
Streamlined workflow to start work on a Jira ticket by fetching ticket details, creating a branch, and initiating task planning.
When to Use This Skill
Activate this skill when:
- The user says "work on AGP-123" or "start work on AGP-123"
- The user says "pick up AGP-123" or "begin AGP-123"
- The user mentions starting work on a specific Jira ticket ID
- Pattern:
work on [TICKET_ID]or similar intent
Workflow
1. Parse Ticket ID
Extract the Jira ticket ID from the user's message. Common patterns:
work on AGP-782start AGP-782pick up PROJ-123
Ticket ID format: [A-Z]+-[0-9]+ (e.g., AGP-782, AICC-123)
2. Fetch Jira Ticket Details
Use the MCP Zapier tool to fetch the ticket:
mcp__zapier -
frontend__jira_software_cloud_find_issue_by_key({
instructions: "Get details for ticket [TICKET_ID]",
key: "[TICKET_ID]",
fields: "summary,description,issuetype,priority,status",
});
Extract from response:
- Summary (title)
- Description
- Issue type
- Status
- Any other relevant context
3. Generate Branch Name
Create a branch name using this format:
[TICKET_ID]-[kebab-case-summary]
Branch Naming Rules:
- Start with the ticket ID (e.g.,
AGP-782-) - Convert summary to kebab-case (lowercase, dashes instead of spaces)
- Remove special characters
- Keep it concise (max 50 characters total)
- Use meaningful words from the summary
Examples:
AGP-782-migrate-existing-mcp-serverAICC-123-fix-auth-token-expiryPROJ-456-add-user-settings-page
Implementation:
# Convert summary to kebab-case
# Example: "Migrate existing MCP server" -> "migrate-existing-mcp-server"
4. Check Current Git State
Before creating a branch, check the current state:
# Check current branch
git branch --show-current
# Check for uncommitted changes
git status --porcelain
If uncommitted changes exist:
- STOP and inform User
- Suggest: "You have uncommitted changes. Should I commit them first, stash them, or continue anyway?"
- Wait for User's decision
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 345 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A 8bd3cb3cae26
work-on-ticket is a skill published in the GitHub repository jjmartres/ai-coding-agents (45 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 2,265 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pod-init
Initialize CocoPlus project bundle in the current directory. Creates .cocoplus/ directory structure, copies all templates, initializes AGENTS.md, project.md, flow.json, and creates the initial git commit. Run this once per project before using any other CocoPlus command.
cocoplus-config
CocoPlus configuration SSOT — $cocoplus sync propagates cocoplus.toml into downstream artifacts; $cocoplus migrate-config converts legacy safety-config.json. Invoked via $cocoplus sync and $cocoplus migrate-config.
project
GitHub Issues as PLAN.md replacement — agents read/update them. Auto-invoke on issue-linked branches. Triggers "what's the plan", "project status", "sync with github", "close the issue".
audit-pr
Audit a whole PR against the delivery contract and return MERGE-READY or evidenced blockers with the full URL. Consumes the current review-change REVIEW-PASS receipt instead of re-running review axes; posts a SHA-bound ready comment; never edits or merges. Triggers: "audit-pr", "is this PR ready", "merge gate".
workflow-status
Read-only workflow sensor: compute repository, roadmap, dependency, PR, finding, and recovery state, then emit the fixed machine envelope. Never edits. Triggers: "workflow-status", "workflow status", "what can I build next", "state of the run".
review-spec
Independent read-only review of a frozen Product half before engineering planning. Runs the exact Product checks in a clean context and returns only SPEC-REVIEW-PASS, SPEC-REVIEW-FAIL, or NEEDS-DESIGN with a content-bound receipt. Never edits the reviewed SPEC. Triggers: "review-spec", "review the spec", "review…