saas-competitive-research

saas-competitive-research is a skill for Claude Code from jonbishop1/saas-marketing-skills. It costs 147 tokens per session (5,245 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A research guide for studying competing software products, including their customers, features, prices, and market position.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to identify competitors, build comparison profiles, examine pricing and packaging, map the market, and find positioning opportunities.
Why use it?
It helps founders avoid guessing about the market or copying competitors without understanding where their own product could fit.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: positional $N argument; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

Part of the saas-marketing-skills plugin — 16 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to identify competitors, build comparison profiles, examine pricing and packaging, map the market, and find positioning opportunities.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/jonbishop1/saas-marketing-skills/saas-competitive-research
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add jonbishop1/saas-marketing-skills --skill saas-competitive-research
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/jonbishop1/saas-marketing-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install saas-marketing-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 16 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for saas-competitive-research

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jonbishop1/saas-marketing-skills/saas-competitive-research/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/jonbishop1/saas-marketing-skills/saas-competitive-research)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jonbishop1/saas-marketing-skills/saas-competitive-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jonbishop1/saas-marketing-skills/saas-competitive-research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for saas-competitive-research

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/jonbishop1/saas-marketing-skills/saas-competitive-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/jonbishop1/saas-marketing-skills/saas-competitive-research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 147 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 5,245 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00147 $0.05245
Opus 5 $0.00073 $0.02622
Sonnet 5 $0.00029 $0.01049
Haiku 4.5 $0.00015 $0.00524

Measured 12d ago against content hash 5df5a06c5e39, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

saas-competitive-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/saas-competitive-research/SKILL.md · 410 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 410 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

SaaS Competitive Research

Audience: developers and technical founders. Explain things in engineering terms. Before advising, read saas-marketing-background/references/background.md and gather missing background. Be a competitive intelligence analyst and coach — help the founder see the landscape clearly, find openings, and avoid blind spots.

When producing competitive research, actively build competitor profiles using web search and available data. Fill in what you can find, flag what the founder needs to supply, and produce structured deliverables they can reference and update over time.

For any copywriting or messaging work that comes out of competitive analysis, route to saas-copywriting.


Table of Contents

  1. Why Competitive Research Matters
  2. Situation Assessment
  3. Three Tiers of Competitive Research
  4. Identifying Your Competitors
  5. Building Competitor Profiles
  6. Pricing and Packaging Analysis
  7. Competitive Positioning
  8. Common Mistakes
  9. Reference Files

Why Competitive Research Matters

Most technical founders fall into one of two traps: they either ignore competitors entirely ("we'll just build a better product") or obsess over them ("competitor X just shipped feature Y, we need to match it immediately"). Both hurt you.

Ignoring competitors means you're positioning blind. You'll use language that sounds like everyone else, price without context, and miss channels where competitors are weak and you could win. Obsessing over competitors means you're always reacting instead of leading, and you end up building a copy of the market leader instead of something differentiated.

Good competitive research answers four questions:

  1. Who am I actually competing with? (not who you think — who your customers are actually evaluating)
  2. How do they position and price? (so you can differentiate, not duplicate)
  3. Where are they strong and where are they weak? (so you invest your limited resources where they'll matter most)
  4. What openings exist that nobody is filling? (underserved segments, uncontested channels, ignored messaging angles)

Read the full file on GitHub · 410 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 410 lines · 147 tokens per session scan A 5df5a06c5e39

Subscribe to this mod's changes

saas-competitive-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository jonbishop1/saas-marketing-skills (2 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 147 tokens to every session and 5,245 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

chief-revenue-officer

Owns the revenue engine end to end: sales, monetization, pricing, customer success, retention, and partnerships. Use this for pricing and packaging decisions, sales strategy and coverage, forecast and pipeline health, churn and expansion, partner and channel strategy, or when marketing-sourced demand is not…

cbrock84/headcount · 80 tokens

seo-strategy

Audits and improves organic search performance — technical health, site architecture, internal linking, structured data, and the content decisions that determine what can rank. Use this to run an SEO audit, diagnose why pages are not ranking or were deindexed, plan a site's URL and navigation structure, add structured…

cbrock84/headcount · 74 tokens

financial-statement-analysis

Reads a set of financial statements and establishes what changed and why — fluctuation analysis against prior period and against budget, profitability, liquidity, solvency and efficiency ratios, benchmarking, and the non-GAAP measures presented alongside them. Use this to interpret results, review a counterparty's or…

cbrock84/headcount · 93 tokens

youtube-producer

Plans, packages, and scripts long-form video for retention and channel growth — idea selection, titles and thumbnails, script structure, and diagnosing why a video or channel underperforms. Use this for video ideas, packaging, scripting, a retention teardown, or channel strategy — including when someone describes a…

cbrock84/headcount · 86 tokens

scenario-planning

Plans under genuine uncertainty — building scenarios, identifying which assumptions are load-bearing, setting early-warning indicators, and stress-testing a plan against futures rather than forecasting one. Use this when a decision depends on something unknowable, when a plan assumes conditions that may not hold…

cbrock84/headcount · 78 tokens

ai-ml-governance

Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory…

cbrock84/headcount · 83 tokens