Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to junghwaYang/oh-my-codex. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/junghwaYang/oh-my-codex/main/.codex/skills/tdd/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/junghwaYang/oh-my-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/tdd)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/tdd/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/tdd"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/junghwayang/oh-my-codex/tdd.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00697 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00279 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
tdd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 132 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TDD Skill
Test-Driven Development workflow.
When to Use
- Building new features with clear requirements
- Refactoring with safety net
- Bug fixes (reproduce first, then fix)
- When code correctness is critical
When NOT to Use
- Exploratory prototyping
- UI/visual development
- One-off scripts
TDD Cycle
┌─────────────────┐
│ RED │
│ Write a │
│ failing test │
└────────┬────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ GREEN │
│ Make it │
│ pass │
└────────┬────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ REFACTOR │
│ Clean up │
│ the code │
└────────┬────────┘
│
└──────────→ (repeat)
Workflow
1. RED - Write Failing Test
// Write the test FIRST
test('should calculate total with tax', () => {
const cart = new Cart();
cart.add({ price: 100 });
expect(cart.totalWithTax(0.1)).toBe(110);
});
Run test → Should FAIL (function doesn't exist yet)
2. GREEN - Minimal Implementation
// Write JUST enough to pass
class Cart {
items = [];
add(item) { this.items.push(item); }
totalWithTax(rate) {
const subtotal = this.items.reduce((sum, i) => sum + i.price, 0);
return subtotal * (1 + rate);
}
}
Run test → Should PASS
3. REFACTOR - Improve
// Now clean up
class Cart {
private items: CartItem[] = [];
add(item: CartItem): void {
this.items.push(item);
}
get subtotal(): number {
return this.items.reduce((sum, item) => sum + item.price, 0);
}
totalWithTax(taxRate: number): number {
return this.subtotal * (1 + taxRate);
}
}
Run test → Should still PASS
Test Structure
describe('Feature', () => {
// Setup
beforeEach(() => { /* reset state */ });
// Happy path
test('should work with valid input', () => {});
// Edge cases
test('should handle empty input', () => {});
test('should handle null', () => {});
// Error cases
test('should throw on invalid input', () => {});
});
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 132 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 706550218d5d
tdd is a skill published in the GitHub repository junghwaYang/oh-my-codex (5 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 697 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
tdd compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tddjunghwaYang/oh-my-codex | Skill | 5 | 8mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Codex |
| engram-testing-coverageGentleman-Programming/engram | Skill | 7.8k | today | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code, Codex |
| principle-test-behavior-not-implementationmichael-denyer/pstack-claude | Skill | 4.1k | today | MIT | A | 50 | Claude Code |
| tddcodewithmukesh/dotnet-claude-kit | Skill | 807 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 81 | Claude Code |
| nw-ddd-eventsourcingnWave-ai/nWave | Skill | 632 | yesterday | MIT | A | 38 | Claude Code |
| nw-fp-clojurenWave-ai/nWave | Skill | 632 | yesterday | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code |
| nw-leanux-methodologynWave-ai/nWave | Skill | 632 | yesterday | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code |