Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude --skill citation-verifiergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KhaledSaeed18/dotclaudeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/citation-verifier)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/citation-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/citation-verifier/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/citation-verifier"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/khaledsaeed18/dotclaude/citation-verifier.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00113 | $0.01232 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00045 | $0.00493 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00246 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
citation-verifier scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 25d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
1. If it has a `doi`: `curl -s "https://api.crossref.org/works/<doi>"` and compare title (normalised), first author surname, and year. A DOI that returns 404 is fabricated or mistyped: search CrossRef by title to find th How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
A fabricated or misattributed citation is the one error a thesis cannot survive. This skill treats every citation as unverified until three checks pass: the key exists, the entry is real, and the claim is supported.
Level 1: every key exists
- Extract cite keys from the document:
- LaTeX:
\cite{a,b},\citep,\citet,\parencite,\textcite,\autocite,\footcite, and starred/optional-argument forms. - Markdown/Pandoc:
[@key],[@a; @b, p. 3],@key. - Word: extract with
pandoc file.docx -t markdownand look for Zotero fields or(Author, Year)strings; match those against.bibauthor+year.
- LaTeX:
- Parse the
.bibkeys (^@\w+\{([^,]+),). - Report keys cited but not defined (hard error) and entries defined but never cited (informational; the bibliography should usually contain only cited works).
Level 2: every entry is real
For each cited entry:
- If it has a
doi:curl -s "https://api.crossref.org/works/<doi>"and compare title (normalised), first author surname, and year. A DOI that returns 404 is fabricated or mistyped: search CrossRef by title to find the real one and report both. - If it has an arXiv
eprint:curl -s "http://export.arxiv.org/api/query?id_list=<id>"and compare title and first author. - If it has only a URL:
curl -sI <url>returns 2xx/3xx; flag as weakly verified. - If it has none of these:
curl -s "https://api.crossref.org/works?query.bibliographic=<title>&rows=3"and report whether a plausible match exists. Until it does, the entry is unverified.
Rate-limit to one request per second per host. Cache results in research/.citation-cache.json keyed by DOI so re-runs are fast.
A mismatch in title or author is reported as mismatched, with the fetched metadata beside the .bib entry, because it usually means the wrong DOI was attached to the right paper (or the right DOI to a paraphrased title).
Level 3: every claim is supported
This is the check that catches "the paper says X" when it does not. For each citation in context:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 25d ago First seen · 66 lines · 113 tokens per session scan A bbca6a4d848b
citation-verifier is a skill published in the GitHub repository KhaledSaeed18/dotclaude (5 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 113 tokens to every session and 1,232 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-22.
Other skills, from other repositories
analytics-strategy
Design measurement frameworks including event taxonomy, KPI hierarchy, dashboard architecture, attribution models, and analytics implementation strategy. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan analytics, design dashboards, build event taxonomies, define KPIs, set up tracking, or audit existing measurement.…
content-strategy
Develop a content strategy covering editorial positioning, content pillars, formats, calendar, governance, and topical authority planning. Use this skill whenever the user wants to plan a content program, define content pillars, build an editorial calendar, structure topic clusters, set up content governance, or align…
agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305
Für AGB Begriff Vorformuliert 305: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: agb-begriff-vorformuliert-305.
agb-rechtswahl-schweizer-recht-rom-i
Für AGB Rechtswahl Schweizer Recht Rom I: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: agb-rechtswahl-schweizer-recht-rom-i.
review-work
Post-implementation gate review: run manual QA on the real surface yourself, then launch ONE gate reviewer (never a panel) to audit goal, constraints, code quality, security, missed context, and QA evidence. Use before a PR handoff or when the user explicitly asks to review completed work.
haftungsdeckel-fuer-daten-und-modelldienste-pruefen
Bewertet Haftungshöchstbeträge bei Datenverlust, fehlerhaften Modellausgaben und Ausfällen digitaler Dienste anhand konkreter Schadensszenarien. Liefert eine Entscheidungsvorlage mit Risikobeträgen, Ausnahmen und Freigabebedarf.