KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-template is a collection of templates and workflows that use large language models to turn an idea into a product requirements document, technical design, and minimum viable product plan. It is for people building MVPs with AI coding agents or chat tools, and its catalogue entries support that planning and coding workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-template --skill vibe-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/khazp/vibe-coding-prompt-template/vibe-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 120 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00420 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
vibe-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
App workflow router
Use the request and existing project state to choose the next useful action. Load only the context needed to identify the outcome, constraints, and current implementation. An existing file does not prove that a stage is complete.
- New product: use research, PRD, and technical design skills selectively. Quick mode needs a clear outcome, constraints, and acceptance journey; deeper planning is useful for unresolved integrations or consequential decisions.
- Existing product: implement the requested change in the current architecture. Use a change skill if available; missing planning documents do not require restarting discovery.
- Broken behavior: reproduce, diagnose, fix, and verify the failure. Use a debugging skill if available, without redoing the new-product interview.
- Instructions or handoff only: produce the requested artifacts and report their limits; do not begin an unrequested implementation or deployment.
Use vibe-agents when creating project instructions, vibe-build for a new
implementation, and an available verification skill for a relevant user journey.
Only invoke skills actually present in the target environment. The five stages
are a useful route, not five approval gates or a mandatory document set for
every edit.
Reuse answered questions and Handoff Context. Ask for missing consequential decisions; otherwise proceed with clearly stated assumptions. Keep stable constraints in AGENTS.md, decisions in product documents, and current progress in MEMORY.md where the project uses it. One builder is sufficient unless independent work and available tools justify delegation.
Complete the scope the user requested, including relevant checks and fixes. When reporting, distinguish actual results from unperformed checks and name any concrete blocker. Do not stop at the first implementation if a working product was requested; do not publish merely because local work is complete.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -158 lines · -39 tokens per session d4ca9ad57463
- 1mo ago First seen · 198 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A 86c6ef38362e
vibe-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository KhazP/vibe-coding-prompt-template (3,182 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 420 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ccpm
CCPM - spec-driven project management: PRD → Epic → GitHub Issues → parallel agents → shipped code. Use this skill for anything in the software delivery lifecycle: writing a PRD ('write a PRD for X', 'let's plan X', 'scope this out'), parsing a PRD into an epic, decomposing an epic into tasks, syncing to GitHub ('sync…
moai-workflow-worktree
Git worktree management for parallel SPEC development with isolated workspaces, automatic branch registration, and seamless MoAI-ADK integration. Use when setting up parallel development environments.
agent-notes
Use when deciding whether a Cherry Studio change needs an Agent Note, authoring or reviewing a Spec, recording a durable bug-fix decision, moving a note between proposed/implemented/rejected, or checking supersession and stacked Spec approval.
moai-workflow-project
Integrated project management system covering documentation, language initialization, template optimization, docs generation, and JIT document loading. Absorbed from moai-workflow-templates, moai-docs-generation, and moai-workflow-jit-docs.
memstack-business-client-onboarding
Use this skill when the user says 'client onboarding', 'new client', 'onboard client', 'kickoff meeting', 'intake form', 'welcome email', or needs welcome sequences, questionnaires, and setup checklists for new clients. Do NOT use for contracts or invoicing.
memstack-product-roadmap-builder
Use this skill when the user says 'roadmap', 'product roadmap', 'quarterly plan', 'now/next/later', 'OKRs', or needs strategic planning with themes, milestones, resource allocation, and stakeholder-ready views. Do NOT use for MVP scoping or sprint-level planning.