Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Knuckles-Team/ciso-assistant-api --skill ciso-assistant-risk-managementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Knuckles-Team/ciso-assistant-apiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/knuckles-team/ciso-assistant-api/ciso-assistant-risk-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/knuckles-team/ciso-assistant-api/ciso-assistant-risk-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/knuckles-team/ciso-assistant-api/ciso-assistant-risk-management/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/knuckles-team/ciso-assistant-api/ciso-assistant-risk-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/knuckles-team/ciso-assistant-api/ciso-assistant-risk-management.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00136 | $0.01166 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.00583 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00233 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00117 |
Grade A, and why
ciso-assistant-risk-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CISO Assistant Risk Management
Domain-typed access to the CISO Assistant risk surface — risk assessments,
risk scenarios, applied controls, threats and vulnerabilities — for treatment
decisions and KG mapping. Prefer these tools over raw HTTP; they return the
GRC-shaped records the ontology (:RiskScenario, :Control, :Threat,
:Vulnerability) is built on.
When to use
- List / triage risk scenarios and read their inherent/current/residual levels.
- Read a risk assessment and the scenarios it contains.
- List applied controls and their status/priority; decide if a risk is mitigated.
- Ingest risk scenarios / controls into the KG as typed nodes.
When NOT to use
- Compliance assessments (audits), frameworks, requirements →
ciso-assistant-compliance-audit. - Incidents, evidence records and their attachments →
ciso-assistant-incident-evidence. - Arbitrary endpoints the condensed tools don't cover → the verbose 1:1 tools
(set
MCP_TOOL_MODE=verbose).
Prerequisites & environment
Connect via the mcp-client skill against the ciso-assistant-api MCP server.
| Variable | Required | Notes |
|---|---|---|
CISO_ASSISTANT_URL |
✅ | Backend host, e.g. https://ciso.arpa |
CISO_ASSISTANT_TOKEN |
✅* | Pre-minted Knox token |
CISO_ASSISTANT_USERNAME / CISO_ASSISTANT_PASSWORD |
✅* | Login flow exchanged at POST /api/iam/login/ |
CISO_ASSISTANT_SSL_VERIFY |
optional | TLS verification toggle |
* Provide the token or the username/password pair. OIDC delegation is used
automatically when ENABLE_DELEGATION is active.
MCP_TOOL_MODE (condensed|verbose|both) selects the condensed surface (used
below) vs. the one-to-one verbose tools.
Tools & actions
Prefer the condensed tool; it takes action + a params_json JSON string
whose keys are passed straight to the client method.
| Condensed tool | Key actions |
|---|---|
ciso_assistant_risk_management |
api_risk_assessments_list, api_risk_scenarios_list, api_risk_scenarios_retrieve, api_threats_list, api_vulnerabilities_list |
ciso_assistant_compliance |
api_applied_controls_list, api_applied_controls_retrieve (controls live under the compliance client) |
ciso_ingest |
native KG push: kind = risk_scenarios | applied_controls | risk_assessments | vulnerabilities |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 99 lines · 136 tokens per session scan A ece8d7c6629f
ciso-assistant-risk-management is a skill published in the GitHub repository Knuckles-Team/ciso-assistant-api (0 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 136 tokens to every session and 1,166 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
servicenow-irm-grc
ServiceNow Integrated Risk Management / GRC — the ServiceNow equivalent of RSA Archer (GRC) and OneTrust (privacy). Covers Risk Management, Policy & Compliance, Audit Management, Vendor / Third-Party Risk (TPRM), and Privacy Management. Use when the agent must list open risks, roll up compliance by control state, list…
GRC & Compliance
Governance, risk, and compliance — risk assessment and scoring, control mapping across NIST CSF 2.0 / ISO 27001:2022 / SOC 2 / CIS Controls v8, gap analysis, audit evidence preparation, and security policy generation.
compliance
Use when scoping which regulatory frameworks bind a business — SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, EU AI Act, DORA, NIS2 — building a control register with owners and evidence, or standing up the cadence that keeps it audit-ready. NOT drafting privacy-policy/ROPA/DPA or ToS text (that is gdpr-privacy, terms-conditions)…
insurance-expert
Expert-level insurance systems, underwriting, claims processing, actuarial analysis, risk assessment, and insurtech solutions. Use when the user mentions underwriting, claims, actuarial, risk, or insurtech, or when the task involves Insurance Systems, Insurance Types, Standards and Regulations, or Claims Processing.
soc2-expert
Expert in SOC 2 compliance, trust service criteria, audit preparation, controls implementation, and security frameworks. Use when the user mentions compliance, audit, trust services, AICPA, controls, or security framework, or when the task involves Trust Service Criteria, SOC 2 Types, Security Common Criteria, or…
performing-soc2-type2-audit-preparation
Automates SOC 2 Type II audit preparation including gap assessment against AICPA Trust Services Criteria (CC1-CC9), evidence collection from cloud providers and identity systems, control testing validation, remediation tracking, and continuous compliance monitoring. Covers all five TSC categories (Security…