Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Kokxi/qa-test-skills --skill qa-tech-debt-managementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Kokxi/qa-test-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kokxi/qa-test-skills/qa-tech-debt-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kokxi/qa-test-skills/qa-tech-debt-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kokxi/qa-test-skills/qa-tech-debt-management/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kokxi/qa-test-skills/qa-tech-debt-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kokxi/qa-test-skills/qa-tech-debt-management.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00107 | $0.02943 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00053 | $0.01471 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00021 | $0.00589 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00294 |
Grade A, and why
qa-tech-debt-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 331 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
⚠️ 安全警告:本技能的示例可能涉及发布阻塞评估和线上问题影响分析。 实际使用时请勿直接基于评估结论阻塞发布或下线功能,先与开发和产品确认风险。 本技能仅在 workspace/ 输出评估文件,不持久化、不外传、不跨会话复用。
技术债务管理
核心原则
技术债务是不可避免的,关键是要识别、评估、并有计划地偿还。
技术债务类型
自动化债务
债务表现:
├─ 自动化脚本不稳定
│ ├─ 频繁失败(假阳性)
│ ├─ 执行时间过长
│ └─ 维护成本高
│
├─ 自动化覆盖不足
│ ├─ 核心流程未覆盖
│ ├─ 边界场景未覆盖
│ └─ 异常场景未覆盖
│
├─ 框架问题
│ ├─ 框架版本过旧
│ ├─ 框架设计不合理
│ └─ 框架文档缺失
│
└─ 代码质量
├─ 代码重复
├─ 代码复杂度高
└─ 代码可读性差
测试债务
债务表现:
├─ 用例问题
│ ├─ 用例过时
│ ├─ 用例冗余
│ ├─ 用例覆盖不足
│ └─ 用例维护困难
│
├─ 流程问题
│ ├─ 测试流程不规范
│ ├─ 测试执行不彻底
│ ├─ 缺陷管理混乱
│ └─ 回归测试不充分
│
└─ 环境问题
├─ 测试环境不稳定
├─ 测试数据不足
├─ 测试工具落后
└─ 测试基础设施薄弱
架构债务
债务表现:
├─ 可测试性差
│ ├─ 接口不可Mock
│ ├─ 日志不完整
│ ├─ 配置不灵活
│ └─ 数据不可构造
│
├─ 测试架构问题
│ ├─ 分层不清晰
│ ├─ 职责不单一
│ ├─ 扩展性差
│ └─ 可维护性差
│
└─ 集成问题
├─ CI/CD集成不完善
├─ 报告不规范
├─ 监控不完善
└─ 工具链不统一
债务评估
评估维度
├─ 影响度
│ ├─ 对测试效率的影响
│ ├─ 对测试质量的影响
│ ├─ 对团队士气的影响
│ └─ 对交付速度的影响
│
├─ 紧迫度
│ ├─ 是否阻塞当前工作
│ ├─ 是否影响发布
│ ├─ 是否导致线上问题
│ └─ 是否影响团队效率
│
├─ 解决成本
│ ├─ 人力成本
│ ├─ 时间成本
│ ├─ 风险成本
│ └─ 机会成本
│
└─ 解决收益
├─ 效率提升
├─ 质量提升
├─ 成本降低
└─ 风险降低
评估矩阵
| 债务类型 | 影响度 | 紧迫度 | 解决成本 | 解决收益 | 优先级 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 自动化不稳定 | 高 | 高 | 中 | 高 | P0 |
| 用例过时 | 中 | 中 | 低 | 中 | P1 |
| 框架版本旧 | 中 | 低 | 高 | 中 | P2 |
| 文档缺失 | 低 | 低 | 低 | 低 | P3 |
债务治理
治理策略
├─ 立即解决(P0)
│ ├─ 阻塞性问题
│ ├─ 线上问题
│ └─ 效率严重下降
│
├─ 计划解决(P1)
│ ├─ 影响当前迭代
│ ├─ 影响团队效率
│ └─ 风险较高
│
├─ 逐步解决(P2)
│ ├─ 不影响当前工作
│ ├─ 可以规划解决
│ └─ 成本较高
│
└─ 持续监控(P3)
├─ 影响较小
├─ 成本较高
└─ 可以接受
治理方法
自动化债务治理:
├─ 脚本稳定化
│ ├─ 修复假阳性
│ ├─ 优化等待策略
│ ├─ 增加重试机制
│ └─ 改进错误处理
│
├─ 覆盖提升
│ ├─ 补充核心流程
│ ├─ 补充边界场景
│ ├─ 补充异常场景
│ └─ 优化测试数据
│
└─ 框架升级
├─ 版本升级
├─ 架构优化
├─ 文档完善
└─ 工具统一
测试债务治理:
├─ 用例优化
│ ├─ 清理过时用例
│ ├─ 合并冗余用例
│ ├─ 补充覆盖不足
│ └─ 改进可维护性
│
├─ 流程改进
│ ├─ 规范测试流程
│ ├─ 完善执行标准
│ ├─ 改进缺陷管理
│ └─ 优化回归策略
│
└─ 环境改善
├─ 稳定测试环境
├─ 补充测试数据
├─ 升级测试工具
└─ 完善基础设施
架构债务治理:
├─ 可测试性改进
│ ├─ 接口Mock化
│ ├─ 日志完善
│ ├─ 配置动态化
│ └─ 数据构造化
│
├─ 架构优化
│ ├─ 分层清晰化
│ ├─ 职责单一化
│ ├─ 扩展性提升
│ └─ 可维护性提升
│
└─ 集成完善
├─ CI/CD完善
├─ 报告规范化
├─ 监控完善
└─ 工具链统一
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed a71a385c5be6
- 12d ago First seen · 331 lines · 107 tokens per session scan A cbec59ce9c7e
qa-tech-debt-management is a skill published in the GitHub repository Kokxi/qa-test-skills (27 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 107 tokens to every session and 2,943 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
sparc-methodology
SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration.
swarm-advanced
Advanced swarm orchestration patterns for research, development, testing, and complex distributed workflows.
code-review
Reviews Spec Kit code changes for positive and negative test coverage, regression evidence for bug fixes, and consistent repository terminology. Use when reviewing a diff or pull request. Do not use for implementing changes or posting GitHub review actions.
agent-harness-fault-injection
Use when an agent workflow needs deterministic recovery evidence for sandbox, MCP/tool, worker, checkpoint, memory, or orchestration failures.
octocode-benchmark
Use when planning, running, grading, or reporting the by-hand Octocode research benchmark — pairwise matchups (Octocode anchor vs one baseline: gh+RTK, gh+Headroom, or plain gh) over markdown questions, with a fresh isolated runner agent per (question, arm, pass), one blind judge per question grading two answers X/Y…
octocode-graph-eval
Use when you need a measurable keep/discard loop — goal→KPI, baseline vs target, held-out checks, eval suites, or don't-stop-till-done against a runnable sensor. Not for ordinary ship checks where 'tests passed' is enough.