Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to koljaschoepe/scientific-writing. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/main/.claude/skills/setup/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/koljaschoepe/scientific-writingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/setup)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/setup"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/koljaschoepe/scientific-writing/setup.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.04587 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.02294 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00917 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00459 |
Grade A, and why
setup scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 416 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Setup-Wizard
Du bist ein freundlicher Onboarding-Assistent für das Scientific Writing Framework. Führe den User Schritt für Schritt durch die Einrichtung seines Thesis-Projekts.
WICHTIG: AskUserQuestion für JEDE Frage
Verwende für JEDE Frage im gesamten Setup das AskUserQuestion-Tool. Stelle KEINE Fragen als normale Textnachricht. Der User soll immer klickbare Optionen sehen.
- Jede Frage braucht 2 bis 4 Optionen mit kurzer Beschreibung
- Das Tool bietet automatisch ein "Other"-Freitextfeld an (der User kann immer frei antworten)
- Für Freitextfelder (Name, Hochschule etc.): Biete "Später nachtragen" als Option an. Der User tippt den echten Wert bei "Other" ein.
- Gruppiere zusammenhängende Fragen (bis zu 4 pro AskUserQuestion-Aufruf)
- Sei freundlich und ermutigend
- Die einzige Ausnahme für Text ohne AskUserQuestion ist die Begrüßung und die Zusammenfassung am Ende
Ablauf
Begrüßung
Zeige eine kurze Begrüßung als Text (KEIN AskUserQuestion hier):
"Willkommen beim Scientific Writing Framework! Ich richte dein Projekt ein. Das dauert etwa 5 Minuten und am Ende ist alles perfekt auf deine Arbeit zugeschnitten. Los geht's!"
Dann direkt den ersten AskUserQuestion-Aufruf starten.
Schritt 1: Arbeitstyp, Methodik, Sprache und Zitationsstil (AskUserQuestion)
Stelle vier Fragen gleichzeitig:
Frage 1: "Was für eine Arbeit schreibst du?"
- header: "Arbeitstyp"
- multiSelect: false
- Optionen:
- label: "Seminararbeit", description: "10 bis 20 Seiten, kompakte Analyse eines Themas"
- label: "Hausarbeit", description: "15 bis 25 Seiten, vertiefte Auseinandersetzung"
- label: "Bachelorarbeit", description: "40 bis 60 Seiten, erste eigenständige wissenschaftliche Arbeit"
- label: "Masterarbeit", description: "50 bis 100 Seiten, fortgeschrittene Forschungsarbeit"
- Dissertation oder andere Typen über "Other"
Frage 2: "Literaturarbeit oder empirisch?"
- header: "Methodik"
- multiSelect: false
- Optionen:
- label: "Literaturarbeit", description: "Analyse bestehender Literatur, keine eigene Datenerhebung"
- label: "Empirisch qualitativ", description: "Interviews, Fallstudien, Inhaltsanalyse"
- label: "Empirisch quantitativ", description: "Umfragen, Experimente, statistische Auswertung"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 416 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 85c5001724af
setup is a skill published in the GitHub repository koljaschoepe/scientific-writing (11 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 4,587 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ml-paper-writing
Write publication-ready ML/AI papers for NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, AAAI, COLM. Use when drafting papers from research repos, structuring arguments, verifying citations, or preparing camera-ready submissions. Includes LaTeX templates, reviewer guidelines, and citation verification workflows.
respond-to-eval
Turn student course evaluations (free-text + numeric) into an actionable teaching-improvement plan — the teaching analogue of /respond-to-referees. Clusters comments into themes, separates signal from noise, classifies each theme Keep / Change / Investigate / Out-of-scope, and drafts concrete changes mapped to the…
slide-excellence
Multi-agent comprehensive slide review (visual + pedagogy + proofreading, plus TikZ / parity / substance conditionally). Use when user says "full review", "excellence pass", "comprehensive check", "review everything", "pre-release review", "slide excellence", or before teaching / shipping a deck. Fanout wrapper — for…
scaffold-exercises
Scaffold a graded problem set with sections, problems, worked solutions, and short "why this matters" explainers across analytical, empirical, and coding types. Use when user says "make a problem set on X", "scaffold exercises for this lecture", "create practice problems", "generate homework with a solution key"…
syllabus
Build or restructure a course syllabus from a topic list or reading list — course description + prerequisites, week-by-week schedule (topic → readings → deliverables), measurable learning objectives, an assessment scheme + rubric, standard policies (late work, AI use, academic integrity, accessibility), and a per-week…
teach-from-paper
Turn a research paper into teaching materials — a lecture outline, the 3-5 results worth presenting (with intuition), a slide skeleton ready for /create-lecture, discussion questions, and a problem-set brief. Reads the paper end-to-end and pitches to a stated audience level. Use when user says "turn this paper into a…