respond-to-eval

respond-to-eval is a skill for Claude Code from pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow. It costs 111 tokens per session (2,405 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A teaching-feedback skill that turns student course evaluations into a documented plan for improving a course.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to analyse written and numeric evaluations, identify teaching priorities, and plan concrete syllabus or slide changes.
Why use it?
It separates recurring themes from isolated comments and connects feedback to specific decisions about what to keep, change, investigate, or leave out.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: allowed-tools in frontmatter. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths; positional $N argument.

Good fit Use it to analyse written and numeric evaluations, identify teaching priorities, and plan concrete syllabus or slide changes.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/respond-to-eval
About the project

claude-code-my-workflow is a forkable setup for using Claude Code to produce and review academic papers, slides, data analyses, and replication packages. Researchers use its agents, skills, rules, hooks, and quality checks to coordinate these tasks and verify their results. The catalogue entries define the reusable workflow components for Claude Code.

pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow · 1,569 stars · on GitHub · psantanna.com

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill respond-to-eval
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for respond-to-eval

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/respond-to-eval/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/respond-to-eval)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/respond-to-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/respond-to-eval/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for respond-to-eval

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/respond-to-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/respond-to-eval.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 111 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,405 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Agent Snooping · line 117
    Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.
    Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
  • medium Agent Snooping · line 118
    Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.
    Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
  • medium Agent Snooping · line 119
    Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.
    Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00111 $0.02405
Opus 5 $0.00056 $0.01203
Sonnet 5 $0.00022 $0.00481
Haiku 4.5 $0.00011 $0.00241

Measured 9d ago against content hash 1a7c7fde3241, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

respond-to-eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/respond-to-eval/SKILL.md · 129 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 129 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Respond to Evaluations

Convert a semester's course evaluations into a defensible teaching-improvement plan. Cluster free-text comments into themes, weight each theme by how many independent students raised it, classify what to do about it, and draft specific changes pointed at the syllabus and deck — so next semester's revision is a checklist, not a vibe.

Posture (echoes /respond-to-referees): one angry comment is not a trend, and a comment you disagree with is a signal to investigate, not a license to ignore or to auto-act. A single student's frustration may be the only one willing to say what twenty felt — frequency weights the theme, it does not gate it. Ground truth here is a process: the plan records why a theme was kept or changed, so the reasoning survives to the next round.

When to use

  • End of term, when numeric scores + open-text comments land and you want a revision plan, not a mood.
  • Assembling a teaching dossier / tenure file where you must show you acted on feedback.
  • Mid-stream (early-semester feedback) to course-correct before the term ends.

Not for: writing the syllabus from scratch (compose with /create-lecture and a course outline), or reviewing one deck's pedagogy (use /pedagogy-review).

Inputs

  • $0 — the evaluation file(s): a CSV/TSV export, .txt/.md of pasted comments, or a .pdf/.docx report.
  • $1 (optional) — the prior improvement plan, so this round is a diff (did last term's changes land?).
Format How to read
.csv, .tsv, .txt, .md Read directly; for CSV, note which column is numeric vs free-text.
.pdf TMP=$(mktemp -t evals).txt && pdftotext "$0" "$TMP" (poppler). Read/grep "$TMP".
.docx TMP=$(mktemp -t evals).txt && pandoc "$0" -t plain -o "$TMP".

If extraction fails or a tool is missing, ask for a plain-text export and stop.

Phases

Phase 0: Load evals + prior plan (Pre-Flight)

Read the eval file(s) and the prior plan (if given). Produce a short Pre-Flight block before clustering:

Read the full file on GitHub · 129 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 129 lines · 111 tokens per session scan A 1a7c7fde3241

Subscribe to this mod's changes

respond-to-eval is a skill published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,569 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 111 tokens to every session and 2,405 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

paper-workflow

A staged workflow for producing an evidence-based economics or social-science research paper, from choosing a topic through submission. It coordinates existing tools and analysis options, including Python, Stata, and R.

brycewang-stanford/Paper-WorkFlow · 262 tokens

r-econometrics

Run IV, DiD, and RDD analyses in R with proper diagnostics.

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills · 20 tokens

econ-management-paper-polish

A writing and editing guide for papers in economics, management, finance, accounting, marketing, information systems, public administration, and related fields.

linkingoscar/econ-management-paper-polish · 83 tokens

econometrics-phd-level

A guide to econometrics, the use of statistics to study relationships in data, based on a 12-part Korean lecture series. It routes questions to explanations of topics such as regression, panel data, instrumental variables, and causal comparisons.

jayjeo/econometrics-phd-level-skill · 201 tokens

did-causal

Use this Skill when the user needs to estimate causal treatment effects using difference-in-differences (DID) designs: two-way fixed effects (TWFE) regression, parallel trends pre-testing, Callaway-Sant'Anna staggered adoption estimator, and Goodman-Bacon decomposition. Covers both Python (linearmodels) and R (did…

xjtulyc/awesome-rosetta-skills · 75 tokens

principal-agent

A Chinese-language guide based on the principal-agent idea: the person who owns a decision or its result may have different incentives from someone acting on another person's behalf. It applies this lens to jobs, companies, and partnerships.

kangarooking/cangjie-skill · 134 tokens