claude-code-my-workflow is a forkable setup for using Claude Code to produce and review academic papers, slides, data analyses, and replication packages. Researchers use its agents, skills, rules, hooks, and quality checks to coordinate these tasks and verify their results. The catalogue entries define the reusable workflow components for Claude Code.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow --skill respond-to-evalgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/respond-to-eval)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/respond-to-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/respond-to-eval/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/respond-to-eval"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow/respond-to-eval.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Agent Snooping · line 117 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 118 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
- medium Agent Snooping · line 119 Skill enumerates or reads other installed skills. Access to other skills' SKILL.md files or the skills directory reveals prompt instructions, capabilities, and secrets that should be invisible to peer skills.Fix: Remove all code or instructions that list or read other skills' files or directories. Skills should operate independently; cross-skill access is a privilege escalation.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00111 | $0.00568 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00044 | $0.00227 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00114 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
respond-to-eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
respond-to-eval
This skill's instructions live in .claude/skills/respond-to-eval/SKILL.md.
Read that file now and follow it, with the files it points to. Read AGENTS.md
first if you have not already.
It was written for Claude Code. Running it from Codex, Antigravity or another agent:
- Arguments. Where it says
$ARGUMENTS, use what the user asked for. - Claude Code agents. Where a step hands work to an agent in
.claude/agents/(through theAgentorTasktool), do that step where it appears in the procedure: never later, and never skip it. A step that gates what follows still gates it (/commitruns its verifier before it commits). Read the agent's file for what the step checks. - Fresh context. If the step needs a context that has not seen your work, for example a claim
verifier that must never see the draft, run it in a separate session or worker that has not
seen the draft, if your tool can start one, and give it only what the step says to pass. If it
cannot, do the step yourself, mark every result it produced not independently verified, and
tell the user to repeat that check in Claude Code (
/verify-claimsfor citations) before relying on it. - Claude Code settings.
allowed-tools,model,effort,argument-hintanddisable-model-invocationin the source's frontmatter configure Claude Code. Ignore them. - Guards. Claude Code's guard hooks do not run for you. Follow the rules in
AGENTS.mdyourself; the git pre-commit gate and CI still apply to your commits.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago Changed · -98 lines scan C → A e9b1b65452ad
- 1mo ago Changed · -1 lines scan A → C 92622383aa2d
- 2mo ago First seen · 129 lines · 111 tokens per session scan A 1a7c7fde3241
respond-to-eval is a skill published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow (1,707 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 111 tokens to every session and 568 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
respond-to-eval compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| respond-to-evalpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow | Skill | 1.7k | 6d ago | MIT | A | 111 | Claude Code |
| paper-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Paper-WorkFlow | Skill | 50 | 22d ago | MIT | A | 101 | Claude Code |
| r-econometricsbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills | Skill | 5.0k | 4d ago | none | A | 20 | Claude Code, Codex |
| econ-management-paper-polishlinkingoscar/econ-management-paper-polish | Skill | 5 | 25d ago | MIT | A | 83 | Codex |
| econometrics-phd-leveljayjeo/econometrics-phd-level-skill | Skill | 2 | 6mo ago | MIT | A | 201 | Claude Code, Codex |
| did-causalxjtulyc/awesome-rosetta-skills | Skill | 35 | 7mo ago | none | A | 75 | Claude Code, Codex |
| founder-coachalirezarezvani/claude-skills | Skill | 30k | yesterday | MIT | A | 41 | Claude Code |