Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add kortix-ai/suna --skill control-pane-opsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kortix-ai/sunaWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kortix-ai/suna/control-pane-ops)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kortix-ai/suna/control-pane-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kortix-ai/suna/control-pane-ops/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kortix-ai/suna/control-pane-ops"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kortix-ai/suna/control-pane-ops.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.01423 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00711 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00285 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
control-pane-ops scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 116 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 86f2ebe2ddf0
control-pane-ops is a skill published in the GitHub repository kortix-ai/suna (20,195 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 1,423 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
mempalace-task
Create, hand off, claim, execute, and close agent tasks through the MemPalace logstream. Use when the user wants to delegate work, prepare a ready-to-paste task for another agent, receive a MemPalace task id, or explicitly launch a supported headless agent in controlled mode.
stale-sweep
Sweep the googleapis/mcp-toolbox repo for issues and PRs with no real activity in N days (default 60), sort each by whose silence it is (the author's, ours, or nobody's), and draft the nudge or close comment. Use whenever a maintainer asks for a stale sweep, backlog cleanup, or an SLO check, e.g. "stale sweep", "find…
meeting-action-items
Turn meeting notes into cited decisions, owners, tickets.
meta-github-pr-watch-digest
Inspect the user's open GitHub PRs / failing CI / new issues via gh, summarize into 3 buckets (to-review / awaiting-me / CI-red), and persist follow-ups to memory.
batch-all-issues
Resolve every open issue one at a time: fact-check each with web research, close the ones that need no action, and run the goal-pr skill to fix, review, and merge the ones that do — repeating until no actionable issues remain.
create-issue-with-websearch
Create a GitHub issue from a vague idea by thoroughly researching the topic on the web to sharpen the specification before filing.