ct-dev-workflow

ct-dev-workflow is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from kryptobaseddev/cleo. It costs 76 tokens per session (2,502 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A development workflow guide for managing tracked coding tasks, branches, commits, tests, and releases.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to enforce task-linked work, branch rules, conventional commit messages, relevant tests, and GitHub Actions workflows.
Why use it?
It helps keep code changes traceable, separated into focused commits, and checked before they are shared.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/kryptobaseddev/cleo/ct-dev-workflow
Any agent
npx skills add kryptobaseddev/cleo --skill ct-dev-workflow
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kryptobaseddev/cleo

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ct-dev-workflow

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kryptobaseddev/cleo/ct-dev-workflow.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kryptobaseddev/cleo/ct-dev-workflow)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kryptobaseddev/cleo/ct-dev-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kryptobaseddev/cleo/ct-dev-workflow.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 76 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,502 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00076 $0.02502
Opus 5 $0.00038 $0.01251
Sonnet 5 $0.00015 $0.00500
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00250

Measured yesterday against content hash aed8c399d9f3, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ct-dev-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

packages/skills/skills/ct-dev-workflow/SKILL.md · 424 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 424 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Development Workflow Context Injection

Protocol: @src/protocols/contribution.md Type: Context Injection (cleo-subagent) Version: 3.0.0


Purpose

Context injection for development workflow tasks spawned via cleo-subagent. Provides domain expertise for atomic commits with task traceability, conventional commit messages, and systematic release processes.


Core Principle: Task-Driven Development

CRITICAL: NO code changes or commits without a tracked task.

Every commit MUST be traceable to a CLEO task. This ensures:

  • Work is planned and tracked
  • Changes are reviewable and reversible
  • Progress is measurable
  • Context is preserved for future agents

Immutable Constraints (WORKFLOW)

ID Rule Enforcement
WF-001 Task required NO commits without CLEO task reference
WF-002 Branch discipline NO commits to main/master
WF-003 Atomic commits ONE logical change per commit
WF-004 Conventional format <type>(<scope>): <description>
WF-005 Tests before push Relevant tests MUST pass

Task Tracking Integration

Before Any Work

# 1. Verify you have a task
cleo current

# 2. If no task, find or create one
cleo find "relevant query"
cleo add "Task title" --description "What you're doing" --parent T001
cleo start T123

Commit Message Format

MUST include task reference:

<type>(<scope>): <description>

<body explaining why>

Task: T123
Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

Example:

fix(auth): prevent token expiry race condition

The refresh token was being invalidated before the new access
token was validated, causing intermittent auth failures.

Task: T1456
Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>

Branch & Subagent Awareness

Single Branch Reality

Subagents share the parent session's branch. This means:

  • All work happens on the same branch
  • No parallel feature branches from subagents
  • Commits are sequential, not parallel
  • Worktrees needed for true branch isolation

Read the full file on GitHub · 424 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 424 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A aed8c399d9f3

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ct-dev-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository kryptobaseddev/cleo (160 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 2,502 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.