firstmate is an agent distribution that lets one coding agent coordinate a crew of autonomous agents working in separate git worktrees. It is for running parallel fixes, investigations, plans, and audits while receiving completed pull requests, merges, or reports through one supervising agent. The catalogue entries provide skills, hooks, instructions, and settings for operating this workflow.
Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to kunchenguid/firstmate. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kunchenguid/firstmate/main/.agents/skills/validation-supervision/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/kunchenguid/firstmateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/kunchenguid/firstmate/validation-supervision)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kunchenguid/firstmate/validation-supervision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kunchenguid/firstmate/validation-supervision/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/kunchenguid/firstmate/validation-supervision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/kunchenguid/firstmate/validation-supervision.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00040 | $0.00736 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.00294 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00147 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
validation-supervision scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 27d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Validation supervision
For a no-mistakes ship, trigger validation on the same worker after its implementation commit, using the harness invocation owned by harness-adapters.
The task worker that starts a no-mistakes run drives the pipeline and owns every no-mistakes axi run and no-mistakes axi respond call through the next gate or outcome.
Firstmate never invokes no-mistakes axi respond for a crew-owned run.
bin/fm-dod-lib.sh owns the worker-side --intent contract.
Once validation starts, prefer routing new requirements to follow-up work rather than expanding the current task, unless a new requirement completely invalidates the work being validated; however, the smallest downstream changes needed to keep already accepted product or engineering behavior correct, add behavioral tests where an executable contract exists, or keep documentation accurate remain within the current task even when they touch files not named at intake, and corrections required to satisfy already accepted intent are not new requirements.
Only a current, explicit captain instruction that completely invalidates the work being validated keeps the task with the same worker instead of routing it to follow-up work or handing it to a replacement.
That worker cancels the active run through no-mistakes axi's supported abort command and confirms through axi status that the run has stopped before changing any code.
The worker then follows branch_sync.next_action from structured axi status: use axi sync's supported guarded recovery only when its code is recover_custody, and otherwise proceed only when structured status confirms that branch ownership is already returned and no recovery is required.
Custody recovery settles branch ownership, not content: the worker must replace the obsolete work from the correct pre-invalidation base rather than building on top of the recovered-but-obsolete head, keeping the obsolete run's own pipeline-fix commits out of what gets validated and shipped.
Apart from that single supported abort, do not hand-edit, commit, restart, or start a second validation run while the obsolete run still owns the branch.
Once ownership is settled, validate exactly once against that final head so no obsolete or intermediate head is ever treated as authoritative.
An ask-user finding returns as needs-decision; firstmate loads ask-user-authority and either decides or escalates per that skill.
Send the same worker one exact decision naming the decision key, step, action, affected finding IDs, instructions where needed, and exact response command, passing --resolve-key so the worker's open decision record closes at answer time.
Require the matching resolved event, forbid --yes, and require the worker to process every synchronous return until completion or a genuinely new escalation.
Resume fleet supervision immediately after the decision lands.
Judge validation by the resolved state line from bin/fm-crew-state.sh, whose header owns outcome mappings and CI-monitor/daemon exceptions, never by shell liveness, the last status event, or a raw run record.
Workers parked at approval or fix-review must follow the active gate help.
A worker hand-editing, committing, aborting, or restarting during an active validation run duplicates pipeline ownership outside the supersession sequence above; steer it back to the gate response flow.
The worker reports the PR when CI first becomes green rather than waiting for merge monitoring to finish.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 27d ago First seen · 33 lines · 40 tokens per session scan A 09a290054ca0
validation-supervision is a skill published in the GitHub repository kunchenguid/firstmate (8,295 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 40 tokens to every session and 736 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-28.
Other skills, from other repositories
team-qa
Orchestrate the QA team through a full testing cycle — qa-lead strategy and test plan, qa-tester case writing, execution, sign-off.
scaffold-dotnet-test-project
MUST USE when an existing .NET test project was excluded from a .slnf/CI solution filter, disappeared from .sln/.slnx discovery, or lost its production ProjectReference; also for requests to set up, create, reuse, add, register, include, or repair a test project. Handles "tests pass directly but CI discovers zero"…
test-result-feedback
Close the acceptance loop for a tested change — consume the apc test TierResult, map EACH acceptance criterion to a pass/fail outcome from structured fields (never chat text), attach an evidence ref, and write it back to the task. A SUT red is a finding, never softened to green.
conductor-implement
Execute tasks from a track's implementation plan following TDD workflow.
cy-execute-task
Implement and verify an existing CompozyOS spec task, then update its tracking. Excludes review remediation.
implement-feature
Implement an approved feature plan with fresh-context slices, TDD, revision-bound evidence, and PR-ready output.