Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add laurigates/claude-plugins --skill code-complexitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/laurigates/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/laurigates/claude-plugins/code-complexity)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/laurigates/claude-plugins/code-complexity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/laurigates/claude-plugins/code-complexity/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/laurigates/claude-plugins/code-complexity"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/laurigates/claude-plugins/code-complexity.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium Excessive Agency · line 7 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 88 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 187 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01949 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00780 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00390 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00195 |
Grade A, and why
code-complexity scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 189 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/code:complexity
Measure and report code complexity metrics.
When to Use This Skill
| Use this skill when... | Use something else when... |
|---|---|
| Identifying refactoring targets by complexity | Looking for specific anti-patterns → /code:antipatterns |
| Tracking codebase health trends | Doing full code review → /code:review |
| Reviewing large PRs for complexity hotspots | Finding duplicated code → /code:dry-consolidation |
| Setting complexity budgets for the team | Configuring linting rules → /configure:linting |
Context
- Source files: !
find . -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.tsx" -o -name "*.js" -o -name "*.jsx" -o -name "*.py" -o -name "*.rs" -o -name "*.go" \) -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/.git/*" -not -path "*/dist/*" -not -path "*/build/*" - Package files: !
find . -maxdepth 1 \( -name "package.json" -o -name "pyproject.toml" -o -name "Cargo.toml" -o -name "go.mod" \) -type f
Parameters
$1: Path to analyze (defaults to current directory)--threshold: Complexity threshold for flagging (default: 10)--format: Output format —summary(default),detailed,json
Metric Computation: Offload, Never Count By Hand
Complexity metrics (cyclomatic complexity, NLOC, parameter count, function length, nesting depth) are computed by a tool, never by eyeballing function boundaries or counting branches by hand. Hand-counting is token-hungry, irreproducible run-to-run, and exactly the mechanical work that belongs in a deterministic substrate.
- Language-native fast paths (use when the project already has them
configured):
radonfor Python,cargo clippyfor Rust, the ESLintcomplexityrule for JS/TS when an ESLint config exists. lizard— the uniform fallback for every language. One tool computes cyclomatic complexity (CCN), NLOC, parameter count (PARAM), function length, and nesting depth (ND) across JS/TS/Go/Python/Rust/C/C++/Java with machine-readable output. It is the deterministic answer wherever a language-native tool is absent — always the JS/TS and Go path when ESLint complexity isn't configured.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 189 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 941c8bb6ad45
code-complexity is a skill published in the GitHub repository laurigates/claude-plugins (59 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,949 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-feedback
Address code review/PR comments: verify each, then fix.
phpunit-test-team-reviewing
Use this skill when the user asks for a team-based, consensus, multi-reviewer, or red-team review of Shopware PHPUnit tests — trigger phrases like "team review these tests", "consensus review the tests in PR.
phpunit-test-reconciling
Internal sub-skill. Do not auto-activate. Use only when explicitly invoked by name by another skill or agent.
audit-comment-residue
Read-only classifier that flags residue in code comments: history narration, plan or session references, conversational asides, ticket or PR back-references, origin notes, and workarounds with no link or removal condition. Use when asked to 'audit code comments' or report which comments only make sense with the chat…
issue-analyzing
Use this skill when the user asks to analyze a specific GitHub issue, understand what area of code an issue affects, assess an issue's scope, or research the code context around an issue — example triggers like "analyze issue.
pr-analyzing
Use this skill when the user asks to analyze a specific GitHub pull request, review a PR's architectural impact, assess what changed in a PR and why it matters, or research the code relationships affected by a PR — example triggers like "analyze PR.