Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add laurigates/claude-plugins --skill dry-consolidationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/laurigates/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/laurigates/claude-plugins/dry-consolidation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/laurigates/claude-plugins/dry-consolidation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/laurigates/claude-plugins/dry-consolidation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/laurigates/claude-plugins/dry-consolidation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/laurigates/claude-plugins/dry-consolidation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 6 findings, up to medium
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 5 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 187 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 241 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium Excessive Agency · line 6 Skill selects an external model or provider that may use a different account or billing plan than the operator expects. Undisclosed model switches can cause unexpected cost or quota consumption.Fix: Remove the model/provider override or disclose it prominently and require explicit operator approval before invoking an external coding CLI or billed model.
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 57 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
- medium MCP Rug Pull · line 236 npx commands without a version suffix (e.g. @1.0.0) create a rug-pull risk if the upstream server is compromised and publishes a malicious update.Fix: Pin the version: npx @scope/[email protected]
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.02392 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00957 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00478 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00239 |
Grade A, and why
dry-consolidation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 184 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
DRY Consolidation
Systematic extraction of duplicated code into shared, tested abstractions.
When to Use This Skill
| Use this skill when... | Use these instead when... |
|---|---|
| Multiple files have identical/near-identical code blocks | Single file needs cleanup → /code:refactor |
| Copy-pasted utility functions across components | Looking for anti-patterns without fixing → /code:antipatterns |
| Repeated UI patterns (dialogs, pagination, error states) | Functional refactoring of a file or directory → /code:refactor |
| Duplicated hooks or state management boilerplate | Structural code search only → ast-grep-search |
| Near-duplicate copy-paste with renamed vars needs enumerating (jscpd finds the clusters here) | Matching one known structural pattern → ast-grep-search |
| Import blocks are bloated from repeated inline patterns | Linting/formatting issues → /code:lint |
Context
- Target path: !
echo "$1" - Project type: !
find . -maxdepth 1 \( -name "package.json" -o -name "Cargo.toml" -o -name "pyproject.toml" -o -name "go.mod" \) - Source directories: !
find . -maxdepth 1 -type d \( -name "src" -o -name "lib" -o -name "app" -o -name "components" -o -name "packages" \) - Test framework: !
find . -maxdepth 2 \( -name "vitest.config.*" -o -name "jest.config.*" -o -name "pytest.ini" -o -name "conftest.py" \) - Existing shared utilities: !
find . \( -path "*/lib/*" -o -path "*/utils/*" -o -path "*/shared/*" -o -path "*/common/*" -o -path "*/hooks/*" \) -type f -print -quit
Parameters
$1: Path or directory to scan (defaults tosrc/)--scope: Focus on a specific extraction type:utilities,components,hooks, orall(default:all)--dry-run: Analyze and report duplications without making changes
Execution
Execute this 7-step consolidation workflow. Track each extraction as a separate task with TodoWrite when the session has the task tools (see .claude/rules/agentic-permissions.md § Task-tool availability), otherwise as a checklist in your response.
What ships with it
7 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 19d ago Changed · -70 lines 73c95351fee5
- 1mo ago First seen · 254 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 7b3fbb8ae08f
dry-consolidation is a skill published in the GitHub repository laurigates/claude-plugins (59 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 2,392 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
review-feedback
Address code review/PR comments: verify each, then fix.
phpunit-test-team-reviewing
Use this skill when the user asks for a team-based, consensus, multi-reviewer, or red-team review of Shopware PHPUnit tests — trigger phrases like "team review these tests", "consensus review the tests in PR.
phpunit-test-reconciling
Internal sub-skill. Do not auto-activate. Use only when explicitly invoked by name by another skill or agent.
audit-comment-residue
Read-only classifier that flags residue in code comments: history narration, plan or session references, conversational asides, ticket or PR back-references, origin notes, and workarounds with no link or removal condition. Use when asked to 'audit code comments' or report which comments only make sense with the chat…
issue-analyzing
Use this skill when the user asks to analyze a specific GitHub issue, understand what area of code an issue affects, assess an issue's scope, or research the code context around an issue — example triggers like "analyze issue.
pr-analyzing
Use this skill when the user asks to analyze a specific GitHub pull request, review a PR's architectural impact, assess what changed in a PR and why it matters, or research the code relationships affected by a PR — example triggers like "analyze PR.