Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/learningmatter-mit/atomisticskills/drug-docking-analysisnpx skills add learningmatter-mit/AtomisticSkills --skill drug-docking-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/learningmatter-mit/AtomisticSkillsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00032 | $0.02051 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01026 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00410 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00205 |
Grade A, and why
drug-docking-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
drug-docking-analysis
Goal
To analyze virtual screening docking results by computing score distributions, ligand efficiency metrics, and (when labeled actives/inactives are available) enrichment statistics. This skill sits between drug-docking-vina and downstream refinement stages, providing quantitative assessment of docking campaign quality.
Important: this skill does not assess pose quality. A compound can receive an excellent Vina score with a physically implausible pose (internal clashes, strained torsions, mis-assigned bond orders). Always pair this analysis with drug-pose-validation (PoseBusters) before acting on the top-ranked compounds.
Outputs:
- Score distribution KDE plot
- Score vs. molecular weight scatter (visualizes Vina's size/lipophilicity bias)
- Ligand efficiency (LE, BEI, SEI) distributions
- ROC curve with AUC (when labels available)
- Enrichment factor bar chart at 1%, 2%, 5%, 10%, 20% (when labels available)
- Enriched results CSV with per-compound efficiency metrics
Instructions
0. Prerequisites: produce a docking_ranked.csv
This skill expects a ranked CSV produced by drug-docking-vina's collect_results.py. If you are starting from raw drug-docking-vina JSON output, run the collect step first:
# Env: drugdisc-agent
python .agents/skills/drug-docking-vina/scripts/collect_results.py \
--results docking/results/docking_results.json \
--library_csv library/library_master.csv \
--output_dir docking/analysis/
The collect step joins the docking scores with the library CSV to pull SMILES, labels, and (when present) parent_compound_id / microstate_id columns. See drug-docking-vina SKILL.md step 5 for details.
1. Basic analysis (no labels)
When you have docking results but no active/inactive labels:
# Env: drugdisc-agent
python .agents/skills/drug-docking-analysis/scripts/analyze_docking.py \
--docking_csv docking/docking_ranked.csv \
--output_dir docking/analysis/
What ships with it
46 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- examples/cdk2-htvs/inputs/docking_ranked.csv 25 KB
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/analysis_summary.json 496 B
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/docking_analysis.csv 32 KB
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/plots/enrichment_factors.pdf 13 KB
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/plots/enrichment_factors.png 48 KB
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/plots/le_distribution.pdf 17 KB
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/plots/le_distribution.png 65 KB
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/plots/roc_curve.pdf 14 KB
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/plots/roc_curve.png 71 KB
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/plots/score_hist_kde.pdf 14 KB
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/plots/score_hist_kde.png 59 KB
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/plots/score_kde.pdf 17 KB
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/plots/score_kde.png 69 KB
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/plots/score_vs_mw.pdf 17 KB
- examples/cdk2-htvs/output/plots/score_vs_mw.png 150 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/inputs/docking_ranked_microstates.csv 727 B
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/analysis_summary.json 496 B
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/docking_analysis.csv 961 B
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/plots/enrichment_factors.pdf 14 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/plots/enrichment_factors.png 49 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/plots/le_distribution.pdf 18 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/plots/le_distribution.png 64 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/plots/roc_curve.pdf 14 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/plots/roc_curve.png 68 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/plots/score_hist_kde.pdf 14 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/plots/score_hist_kde.png 56 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/plots/score_kde.pdf 17 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/plots/score_kde.png 71 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/plots/score_vs_mw.pdf 15 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output_unaggregated/plots/score_vs_mw.png 70 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output/analysis_summary.json 501 B
- examples/microstates-demo/output/docking_analysis.csv 428 B
- examples/microstates-demo/output/plots/enrichment_factors.pdf 13 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output/plots/enrichment_factors.png 51 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output/plots/le_distribution.pdf 18 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output/plots/le_distribution.png 58 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output/plots/roc_curve.pdf 14 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output/plots/roc_curve.png 67 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output/plots/score_hist_kde.pdf 15 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output/plots/score_hist_kde.png 45 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output/plots/score_kde.pdf 18 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output/plots/score_kde.png 71 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output/plots/score_vs_mw.pdf 15 KB
- examples/microstates-demo/output/plots/score_vs_mw.png 67 KB
- examples/README.md 4.5 KB
- scripts/analyze_docking.py 19 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 121 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A dc7139a1f051
drug-docking-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository learningmatter-mit/AtomisticSkills (154 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 2,051 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
datamol
Pythonic wrapper around RDKit with simplified interface and sensible defaults. Preferred for standard drug discovery including SMILES parsing, standardization, descriptors, fingerprints, clustering, 3D conformers, parallel processing. Returns native rdkit.Chem.Mol objects. For advanced control or custom parameters…
deepchem
Molecular ML with diverse featurizers and pre-built datasets. Use for property prediction (ADMET, toxicity) with traditional ML or GNNs when you want extensive featurization options and MoleculeNet benchmarks. Best for quick experiments with pre-trained models, diverse molecular representations. For graph-first…
binding-affinity
Hybrid ML + physics binding affinity prediction. Empirical scoring, MM/GBSA rescoring, multi-method consensus, and batch virtual screening for protein-ligand complexes.
drug-design
End-to-end drug discovery pipeline orchestration. Deterministic Python script that auto-chains structure prediction, pocket detection, de novo design, docking, scoring, and ADMET filtering into reproducible workflows.
molecular-optimization
Iterative lead optimization with analyze-reason-generate-verify-evaluate loop. Paper-backed (MT-Mol, DrugR, MultiMol).
admet-reasoning
Interpretable ADMET analysis with mechanistic reasoning. Maps liabilities to structural causes and biological pathways. Based on CoTox (Park 2025) and DrugR (Liu 2026).