admet-reasoning

admet-reasoning is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from synthetic-sciences/openscience. It costs 47 tokens per session (611 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

An analysis method that explains why a drug candidate may have ADMET problems by linking chemical structure to biological effects. ADMET covers absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity.

In plain words
What is it for?
Interpreting ADMET predictions, explaining toxicity or other liabilities, suggesting structural changes, and reviewing lead-optimization plans.
Why use it?
It turns prediction scores into reasons that chemists can examine, rather than leaving them with unexplained warnings.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Interpreting ADMET predictions, explaining toxicity or other liabilities, suggesting structural changes, and reviewing lead-optimization plans.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/synthetic-sciences/openscience/admet-reasoning
About the project

synthetic-sciences/openscience is an AI workbench that carries out scientific research by reading papers, forming hypotheses, writing and running code, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and preparing reports. Researchers use it for work in machine learning, biology, physics, and chemistry with remote or local models. Catalogue add-ons extend its scientific workflows through skills and instructions.

synthetic-sciences/openscience · 4,193 stars · on GitHub · openscience.sh

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add synthetic-sciences/openscience --skill admet-reasoning
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/synthetic-sciences/openscience

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for admet-reasoning

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/synthetic-sciences/openscience/admet-reasoning/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/synthetic-sciences/openscience/admet-reasoning)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/synthetic-sciences/openscience/admet-reasoning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/synthetic-sciences/openscience/admet-reasoning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for admet-reasoning

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/synthetic-sciences/openscience/admet-reasoning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/synthetic-sciences/openscience/admet-reasoning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 47 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 611 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00047 $0.00611
Opus 5.5 $0.00019 $0.00244
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00122
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00061

Measured 1mo ago against content hash be1181043ee5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

admet-reasoning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 1 executable file (scripts/reason_admet.py), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

backend/cli/skills/chemistry/admet-reasoning/SKILL.md · 76 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 76 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

ADMET Reasoning

Overview

Standard ADMET prediction tools output scores (e.g., "hERG = 0.85") without explaining why. This skill adds mechanistic reasoning — mapping each ADMET liability to its structural cause, the biological mechanism it affects, and a suggested structural fix.

Based on:

  • CoTox (Park et al., 2025): Chain-of-thought toxicity reasoning with structural + biological context improved F1 from 0.37 to 0.66
  • DrugR (Liu et al., 2026): Explicit liability reasoning before optimization improved scores 18×

When to Use This Skill

  • After ADMET prediction: Interpret flagged liabilities with structural explanations
  • Lead optimization planning: Understand which structural features to modify and why
  • Toxicity reports: Generate interpretable toxicity assessments for medicinal chemistry teams
  • Design review: Evaluate whether proposed modifications address the right liabilities

Do NOT use this skill for:

  • Raw ADMET score computation (use admet-prediction instead)
  • Molecular optimization (use molecular-optimization instead)

Related Skills

  • admet-prediction: Compute ADMET properties (run this first)
  • molecular-optimization: Iterative optimization using liability analysis
  • rdkit: Core molecular operations

Installation

Required dependencies

pip install rdkit-pypi numpy pandas

Core Workflows

1. Full Liability Report

Generate interpretable ADMET analysis for a molecule:

python scripts/reason_admet.py --smiles "c1ccc(NC(=O)c2ccccc2Cl)cc1" --output report.json

2. Batch Liability Analysis

python scripts/reason_admet.py --input compounds.csv --output liability_report.csv

3. Targeted Toxicity Reasoning

Focus on specific endpoints:

python scripts/reason_admet.py --smiles "CCN1CCCC1" --endpoints hERG,DILI,CYP --output tox_report.json

Script Reference

Script Purpose Key Outputs
reason_admet.py Full ADMET reasoning with structural explanations JSON report with liabilities, causes, mechanisms, fixes

Read the full file on GitHub · 76 lines

Files

What ships with it

1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 76 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A be1181043ee5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

admet-reasoning is a skill published in the GitHub repository synthetic-sciences/openscience (4,193 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 611 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.