Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public --skill post-launch-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-publicWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public/post-launch-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public/post-launch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public/post-launch-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public/post-launch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public/post-launch-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00086 | $0.00687 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00344 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00069 |
Grade A, and why
post-launch-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Post-Launch Review — /post-launch-review
Discovery without this step never learns: hypotheses get "confirmed" by analytics, solutions ship, and nobody checks whether the metric actually moved. This job is the difference between a pipeline and a feedback system.
When it fires
- The
post_launch_reviewdependency (created at ship decision, deadline launch + 90 days) comes due — the dashboard will show it. - Or the PM asks directly.
1. Fact vs promise
- Target from
CONTEXT.md(Frame): metric, baseline → target. - Actual: ask the PM for current numbers or
/ingestthe fresh export. - Verdict: hit / partial / miss — with the honest delta, not adjectives.
- On partial/miss, reconcile with the discovery signal: which validated hypothesis over-promised, was it the evidence (source too weak), the sizing (pool smaller than estimated), or the execution (shipped thing ≠ tested thing)? That diagnosis — not the miss itself — is what the knowledge base and the next initiative need.
2. Production verdicts for hypotheses
For every hypothesis that drove shipped work:
hypotheses.py set <id> --confidence 0.95 --note "confirmed in production: <actual effect>" — or downgrade/refute if production disagreed with the
discovery signal. REAL production data beats everything (evidence-typing).
3. Bank the knowledge — knowledge/facts.json
The PM-level knowledge base lives at the repo root in knowledge/
(personal, gitignored automatically). Append facts a FUTURE initiative
would want on day one:
{
"fact": "connected online payment multiplies checkout CR severalfold",
"metric_effect": "+N% CR",
"initiative": "<slug>",
"source": "post-launch review YYYY-MM-DD",
"date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
"tags": ["checkout", "payments"]
}
Format: {"version": 1, "facts": [ ... ]}. Create the file if missing.
Facts must be product truths ("X drives Y"), not initiative trivia.
4. Calibration
Count from registry history across initiatives: how often did INFERRED hypotheses survive REAL validation? Report the ratio — it calibrates how much to trust the next INFERRED batch.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 69 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 81d187680443
post-launch-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public (12 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 687 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
seo-strategy
Audits and improves organic search performance — technical health, site architecture, internal linking, structured data, and the content decisions that determine what can rank. Use this to run an SEO audit, diagnose why pages are not ranking or were deindexed, plan a site's URL and navigation structure, add structured…
financial-statement-analysis
Reads a set of financial statements and establishes what changed and why — fluctuation analysis against prior period and against budget, profitability, liquidity, solvency and efficiency ratios, benchmarking, and the non-GAAP measures presented alongside them. Use this to interpret results, review a counterparty's or…
youtube-producer
Plans, packages, and scripts long-form video for retention and channel growth — idea selection, titles and thumbnails, script structure, and diagnosing why a video or channel underperforms. Use this for video ideas, packaging, scripting, a retention teardown, or channel strategy — including when someone describes a…
estimating-and-contingency
Produces a cost or effort estimate someone can defend — decomposing the work, choosing between analogous, parametric and bottom-up methods, documenting the basis and its assumptions, expressing confidence as a range, and sizing contingency and management reserve separately. Use this to build an estimate, challenge one…
scenario-planning
Plans under genuine uncertainty — building scenarios, identifying which assumptions are load-bearing, setting early-warning indicators, and stress-testing a plan against futures rather than forecasting one. Use this when a decision depends on something unknowable, when a plan assumes conditions that may not hold…
support-operations
Designs and runs the support function — channels, queues, routing, staffing, service levels, quality, and the metrics that show whether it is working. Use this to set up or fix support operations, choose channels, size a team, set or renegotiate service levels, reduce cost per contact, diagnose long queues or poor…