post-launch-review

post-launch-review is a skill for Claude Code from lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public. It costs 86 tokens per session (687 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A skill for checking whether a launched product change reached its planned metric target. It compares the starting point, target, and actual result, then records what happened to the related hypotheses.

In plain words
What is it for?
Running a review after launch, judging a result as hit, partial, or miss, investigating the cause, and updating production confidence for the hypotheses behind the work.
Why use it?
It closes the gap between shipping something and learning whether it worked, including diagnosing whether a miss came from weak evidence, sizing, or execution.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Good fit Running a review after launch, judging a result as hit, partial, or miss, investigating the cause, and updating production confidence for the hypotheses behind the work.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public/post-launch-review
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public --skill post-launch-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for post-launch-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public/post-launch-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public/post-launch-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public/post-launch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public/post-launch-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for post-launch-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public/post-launch-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public/post-launch-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 86 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 687 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00086 $0.00687
Opus 5 $0.00043 $0.00344
Sonnet 5 $0.00017 $0.00137
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00069

Measured 12d ago against content hash 81d187680443, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

post-launch-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/post-launch-review/SKILL.md · 69 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 69 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Post-Launch Review — /post-launch-review

Discovery without this step never learns: hypotheses get "confirmed" by analytics, solutions ship, and nobody checks whether the metric actually moved. This job is the difference between a pipeline and a feedback system.

When it fires

  • The post_launch_review dependency (created at ship decision, deadline launch + 90 days) comes due — the dashboard will show it.
  • Or the PM asks directly.

1. Fact vs promise

  • Target from CONTEXT.md (Frame): metric, baseline → target.
  • Actual: ask the PM for current numbers or /ingest the fresh export.
  • Verdict: hit / partial / miss — with the honest delta, not adjectives.
  • On partial/miss, reconcile with the discovery signal: which validated hypothesis over-promised, was it the evidence (source too weak), the sizing (pool smaller than estimated), or the execution (shipped thing ≠ tested thing)? That diagnosis — not the miss itself — is what the knowledge base and the next initiative need.

2. Production verdicts for hypotheses

For every hypothesis that drove shipped work: hypotheses.py set <id> --confidence 0.95 --note "confirmed in production: <actual effect>" — or downgrade/refute if production disagreed with the discovery signal. REAL production data beats everything (evidence-typing).

3. Bank the knowledge — knowledge/facts.json

The PM-level knowledge base lives at the repo root in knowledge/ (personal, gitignored automatically). Append facts a FUTURE initiative would want on day one:

{
  "fact": "connected online payment multiplies checkout CR severalfold",
  "metric_effect": "+N% CR",
  "initiative": "<slug>",
  "source": "post-launch review YYYY-MM-DD",
  "date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
  "tags": ["checkout", "payments"]
}

Format: {"version": 1, "facts": [ ... ]}. Create the file if missing. Facts must be product truths ("X drives Y"), not initiative trivia.

4. Calibration

Count from registry history across initiatives: how often did INFERRED hypotheses survive REAL validation? Report the ratio — it calibrates how much to trust the next INFERRED batch.

Read the full file on GitHub · 69 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 69 lines · 86 tokens per session scan A 81d187680443

Subscribe to this mod's changes

post-launch-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository lenar-amirov/product-pipeline-public (12 stars, last pushed 23d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 86 tokens to every session and 687 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

seo-strategy

Audits and improves organic search performance — technical health, site architecture, internal linking, structured data, and the content decisions that determine what can rank. Use this to run an SEO audit, diagnose why pages are not ranking or were deindexed, plan a site's URL and navigation structure, add structured…

cbrock84/headcount · 74 tokens

financial-statement-analysis

Reads a set of financial statements and establishes what changed and why — fluctuation analysis against prior period and against budget, profitability, liquidity, solvency and efficiency ratios, benchmarking, and the non-GAAP measures presented alongside them. Use this to interpret results, review a counterparty's or…

cbrock84/headcount · 93 tokens

youtube-producer

Plans, packages, and scripts long-form video for retention and channel growth — idea selection, titles and thumbnails, script structure, and diagnosing why a video or channel underperforms. Use this for video ideas, packaging, scripting, a retention teardown, or channel strategy — including when someone describes a…

cbrock84/headcount · 86 tokens

estimating-and-contingency

Produces a cost or effort estimate someone can defend — decomposing the work, choosing between analogous, parametric and bottom-up methods, documenting the basis and its assumptions, expressing confidence as a range, and sizing contingency and management reserve separately. Use this to build an estimate, challenge one…

cbrock84/headcount · 87 tokens

scenario-planning

Plans under genuine uncertainty — building scenarios, identifying which assumptions are load-bearing, setting early-warning indicators, and stress-testing a plan against futures rather than forecasting one. Use this when a decision depends on something unknowable, when a plan assumes conditions that may not hold…

cbrock84/headcount · 78 tokens

support-operations

Designs and runs the support function — channels, queues, routing, staffing, service levels, quality, and the metrics that show whether it is working. Use this to set up or fix support operations, choose channels, size a team, set or renegotiate service levels, reduce cost per contact, diagnose long queues or poor…

cbrock84/headcount · 77 tokens