Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skill --skill borutagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/boruta)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/boruta"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/boruta/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/boruta"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/boruta.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00787 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00394 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00157 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
Boruta scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Boruta
All-relevant feature selection.
Basic Usage
library(Boruta)
# Run Boruta
boruta_result <- Boruta(target ~ ., data = df, doTrace = 2)
# With formula
boruta_result <- Boruta(y ~ x1 + x2 + x3, data = df)
# Without formula
boruta_result <- Boruta(x = df[, -1], y = df$target)
Parameters
boruta_result <- Boruta(
target ~ .,
data = df,
maxRuns = 100, # Max iterations
doTrace = 2, # Verbosity (0, 1, 2)
holdHistory = TRUE, # Keep importance history
getImp = getImpRfZ # Importance function
)
Results
# Summary
print(boruta_result)
# Get decisions
boruta_result$finalDecision
# Confirmed important
getSelectedAttributes(boruta_result, withTentative = FALSE)
# Including tentative
getSelectedAttributes(boruta_result, withTentative = TRUE)
# Importance scores
attStats(boruta_result)
Handling Tentative
# Resolve tentative features
boruta_final <- TentativeRoughFix(boruta_result)
# Get final selection
getSelectedAttributes(boruta_final)
Visualization
# Plot importance
plot(boruta_result)
# With labels
plot(boruta_result, las = 2, cex.axis = 0.7)
# Custom plot
plotImpHistory(boruta_result)
Custom Importance
# Use different importance measure
boruta_result <- Boruta(
target ~ .,
data = df,
getImp = getImpRfGini # Gini importance
)
# Custom function
my_imp <- function(x, y) {
# Return importance vector
}
boruta_result <- Boruta(target ~ ., data = df, getImp = my_imp)
With Different Models
# Using ranger
library(ranger)
getImpRanger <- function(x, y) {
rf <- ranger(y ~ ., data = data.frame(y, x), importance = "impurity")
return(rf$variable.importance)
}
boruta_result <- Boruta(target ~ ., data = df, getImp = getImpRanger)
Parallel Processing
library(doParallel)
registerDoParallel(cores = 4)
boruta_result <- Boruta(
target ~ .,
data = df,
doTrace = 2
)
Feature Selection Workflow
# 1. Run Boruta
boruta_result <- Boruta(target ~ ., data = train_df, maxRuns = 100)
# 2. Fix tentative
boruta_final <- TentativeRoughFix(boruta_result)
# 3. Get selected features
selected <- getSelectedAttributes(boruta_final)
# 4. Create formula
formula <- as.formula(paste("target ~", paste(selected, collapse = " + ")))
# 5. Train final model
final_model <- randomForest(formula, data = train_df)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 154 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A cb5b41cca5f5
Boruta is a skill published in the GitHub repository LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skill (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 787 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
model-registry-refresh
Re-verify and extend catalog/model-registry.json — the fail-closed model-name and reasoning-effort matrix scripts/model-policy.mjs validates against — via delegated Context7-backed research, orchestrator-owned registry edits, and the full validation chain; use when a policy check fails on an unregistered model, a…
databricks-ai-bi-genie
Use this skill to statically review AI/BI Genie agent and dashboard design: agent scoping (30-table limit), instructions and trusted assets, metric-view correctness, dashboard limits and rendering, benchmark design and honest accuracy reading, and the critical 'Individual data' versus 'Share data' permission decision.…
databricks-data-quality-observability
Use this skill to design and verify data quality expectations, table constraints, Lakehouse Monitoring, freshness detection, event-log interrogation, quality SLAs, and downstream quality signaling for Lakeflow pipelines. Reads pipeline source, table schema, expectations, monitor configuration, and event-log queries…
databricks-genai-agent-engineering
Use this skill to review generative-AI agent design on Databricks: Mosaic AI Agent Framework and ResponsesAgent interface, Databricks AI Search index variant and sync-mode choice, retrieval and context engineering, MCP server category and trust boundaries, external model-provider selection, and Unity AI Gateway…
databricks-genai-evaluation-observability
Use this skill to review generative-AI evaluation, tracing, and observability design on Databricks: MLflow Tracing instrumentation and span design, trace storage and governance, mlflow.genai.evaluate() harness design, the judge-versus-scorer distinction, built-in judge selection (ten single-turn and seven multi-turn)…
databricks-lakeflow-pipeline-engineering
Use this skill to design Lakeflow Spark Declarative Pipelines: medallion layering, Lakeflow Jobs orchestration and task dependencies, Delta table layout (liquid clustering, deletion vectors, Predictive Optimization), Auto Loader ingestion, schema evolution and rescueddata, materialized views versus streaming tables…