Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skill --skill imlgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/iml)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/iml"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/iml/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/iml"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/iml.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.00541 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00270 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00108 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00054 |
Grade A, and why
iml scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
iml
Interpretable Machine Learning.
Create Predictor
library(iml)
# Create predictor object
predictor <- Predictor$new(
model = model,
data = train_data,
y = train_labels
)
Feature Importance
# Permutation importance
imp <- FeatureImp$new(predictor, loss = "mse")
plot(imp)
# Results
imp$results
Partial Dependence
# Single feature
pdp <- FeatureEffect$new(predictor, feature = "age")
plot(pdp)
# Method options
pdp <- FeatureEffect$new(predictor, feature = "age",
method = "pdp") # Partial dependence
pdp <- FeatureEffect$new(predictor, feature = "age",
method = "ale") # Accumulated local effects
pdp <- FeatureEffect$new(predictor, feature = "age",
method = "pdp+ice") # PDP + ICE
Feature Interactions
# Two-way interaction
interact <- Interaction$new(predictor)
plot(interact)
# Specific feature
interact <- Interaction$new(predictor, feature = "age")
SHAP Values
# Shapley values for single prediction
shap <- Shapley$new(predictor, x.interest = new_data[1, ])
plot(shap)
# Results
shap$results
LIME
# Local interpretable model
lime <- LocalModel$new(predictor, x.interest = new_data[1, ])
plot(lime)
# Results
lime$results
Surrogate Model
# Global surrogate
tree <- TreeSurrogate$new(predictor, maxdepth = 3)
plot(tree)
# Predict with surrogate
tree$predict(new_data)
Counterfactuals
# What-if counterfactuals
library(counterfactuals)
cf <- Counterfactuals$new(predictor, x.interest = new_data[1, ])
cf$find_counterfactuals(desired_outcome = 1)
Multiple Features
# 2D PDP
pdp2d <- FeatureEffect$new(predictor,
feature = c("age", "income"),
method = "pdp")
plot(pdp2d)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 112 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A eea745d47d5a
iml is a skill published in the GitHub repository LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skill (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 541 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
model-registry-refresh
Re-verify and extend catalog/model-registry.json — the fail-closed model-name and reasoning-effort matrix scripts/model-policy.mjs validates against — via delegated Context7-backed research, orchestrator-owned registry edits, and the full validation chain; use when a policy check fails on an unregistered model, a…
databricks-ai-bi-genie
Use this skill to statically review AI/BI Genie agent and dashboard design: agent scoping (30-table limit), instructions and trusted assets, metric-view correctness, dashboard limits and rendering, benchmark design and honest accuracy reading, and the critical 'Individual data' versus 'Share data' permission decision.…
databricks-data-quality-observability
Use this skill to design and verify data quality expectations, table constraints, Lakehouse Monitoring, freshness detection, event-log interrogation, quality SLAs, and downstream quality signaling for Lakeflow pipelines. Reads pipeline source, table schema, expectations, monitor configuration, and event-log queries…
databricks-genai-agent-engineering
Use this skill to review generative-AI agent design on Databricks: Mosaic AI Agent Framework and ResponsesAgent interface, Databricks AI Search index variant and sync-mode choice, retrieval and context engineering, MCP server category and trust boundaries, external model-provider selection, and Unity AI Gateway…
databricks-genai-evaluation-observability
Use this skill to review generative-AI evaluation, tracing, and observability design on Databricks: MLflow Tracing instrumentation and span design, trace storage and governance, mlflow.genai.evaluate() harness design, the judge-versus-scorer distinction, built-in judge selection (ten single-turn and seven multi-turn)…
databricks-lakeflow-pipeline-engineering
Use this skill to design Lakeflow Spark Declarative Pipelines: medallion layering, Lakeflow Jobs orchestration and task dependencies, Delta table layout (liquid clustering, deletion vectors, Predictive Optimization), Auto Loader ingestion, schema evolution and rescueddata, materialized views versus streaming tables…