Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skill --skill r-ml-boostinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-boosting)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-boosting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-boosting/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-boosting"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-boosting.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01012 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00506 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00202 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
r-ml-boosting scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 173 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
R Gradient Boosting
High-performance gradient boosting models.
xgboost
library(xgboost)
# Prepare data
dtrain <- xgb.DMatrix(data = as.matrix(train_x), label = train_y)
dtest <- xgb.DMatrix(data = as.matrix(test_x), label = test_y)
# Parameters
params <- list(
objective = "binary:logistic", # or "reg:squarederror"
eval_metric = "auc",
max_depth = 6,
eta = 0.1,
subsample = 0.8,
colsample_bytree = 0.8
)
# Train with early stopping
watchlist <- list(train = dtrain, test = dtest)
model <- xgb.train(
params = params,
data = dtrain,
nrounds = 1000,
watchlist = watchlist,
early_stopping_rounds = 50,
verbose = 1
)
# Predictions
pred <- predict(model, dtest)
# Feature importance
importance <- xgb.importance(model = model)
xgb.plot.importance(importance, top_n = 20)
# Cross-validation
cv <- xgb.cv(
params = params,
data = dtrain,
nrounds = 1000,
nfold = 5,
early_stopping_rounds = 50
)
# Save/load model
xgb.save(model, "model.xgb")
model <- xgb.load("model.xgb")
lightgbm
library(lightgbm)
# Prepare data
dtrain <- lgb.Dataset(data = as.matrix(train_x), label = train_y)
dtest <- lgb.Dataset(data = as.matrix(test_x), label = test_y, reference = dtrain)
# Parameters
params <- list(
objective = "binary",
metric = "auc",
num_leaves = 31,
learning_rate = 0.1,
feature_fraction = 0.8,
bagging_fraction = 0.8,
bagging_freq = 5
)
# Train
model <- lgb.train(
params = params,
data = dtrain,
nrounds = 1000,
valids = list(test = dtest),
early_stopping_rounds = 50
)
# Predictions
pred <- predict(model, as.matrix(test_x))
# Feature importance
importance <- lgb.importance(model)
lgb.plot.importance(importance, top_n = 20)
# Save/load
lgb.save(model, "model.lgb")
model <- lgb.load("model.lgb")
gbm
library(gbm)
# Train
model <- gbm(
target ~ .,
data = train,
distribution = "bernoulli", # or "gaussian"
n.trees = 1000,
interaction.depth = 4,
shrinkage = 0.01,
n.minobsinnode = 10,
cv.folds = 5
)
# Optimal trees
best_iter <- gbm.perf(model, method = "cv")
# Predictions
pred <- predict(model, test, n.trees = best_iter, type = "response")
# Variable importance
summary(model, n.trees = best_iter)
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 173 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A 3385fe7eaeb5
r-ml-boosting is a skill published in the GitHub repository LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skill (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,012 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
model-registry-refresh
Re-verify and extend catalog/model-registry.json — the fail-closed model-name and reasoning-effort matrix scripts/model-policy.mjs validates against — via delegated Context7-backed research, orchestrator-owned registry edits, and the full validation chain; use when a policy check fails on an unregistered model, a…
databricks-ai-bi-genie
Use this skill to statically review AI/BI Genie agent and dashboard design: agent scoping (30-table limit), instructions and trusted assets, metric-view correctness, dashboard limits and rendering, benchmark design and honest accuracy reading, and the critical 'Individual data' versus 'Share data' permission decision.…
databricks-data-quality-observability
Use this skill to design and verify data quality expectations, table constraints, Lakehouse Monitoring, freshness detection, event-log interrogation, quality SLAs, and downstream quality signaling for Lakeflow pipelines. Reads pipeline source, table schema, expectations, monitor configuration, and event-log queries…
databricks-genai-agent-engineering
Use this skill to review generative-AI agent design on Databricks: Mosaic AI Agent Framework and ResponsesAgent interface, Databricks AI Search index variant and sync-mode choice, retrieval and context engineering, MCP server category and trust boundaries, external model-provider selection, and Unity AI Gateway…
databricks-genai-evaluation-observability
Use this skill to review generative-AI evaluation, tracing, and observability design on Databricks: MLflow Tracing instrumentation and span design, trace storage and governance, mlflow.genai.evaluate() harness design, the judge-versus-scorer distinction, built-in judge selection (ten single-turn and seven multi-turn)…
databricks-lakeflow-pipeline-engineering
Use this skill to design Lakeflow Spark Declarative Pipelines: medallion layering, Lakeflow Jobs orchestration and task dependencies, Delta table layout (liquid clustering, deletion vectors, Predictive Optimization), Auto Loader ingestion, schema evolution and rescueddata, materialized views versus streaming tables…