Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skill --skill r-ml-frameworksgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-frameworks)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-frameworks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-frameworks/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-frameworks"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-frameworks.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.01023 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00511 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00205 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
r-ml-frameworks scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 184 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
R ML Frameworks
Unified machine learning workflows.
tidymodels
library(tidymodels)
# 1. Split data
set.seed(123)
split <- initial_split(df, prop = 0.8, strata = target)
train <- training(split)
test <- testing(split)
# 2. Create recipe (preprocessing)
recipe <- recipe(target ~ ., data = train) %>%
step_normalize(all_numeric_predictors()) %>%
step_dummy(all_nominal_predictors()) %>%
step_zv(all_predictors()) %>%
step_impute_median(all_numeric_predictors())
# 3. Specify model
model_spec <- rand_forest(
mtry = tune(),
trees = 500,
min_n = tune()
) %>%
set_engine("ranger") %>%
set_mode("classification")
# 4. Create workflow
wf <- workflow() %>%
add_recipe(recipe) %>%
add_model(model_spec)
# 5. Cross-validation
folds <- vfold_cv(train, v = 5, strata = target)
# 6. Tune hyperparameters
tune_results <- tune_grid(
wf,
resamples = folds,
grid = 20,
metrics = metric_set(roc_auc, accuracy)
)
# 7. Select best model
best_params <- select_best(tune_results, metric = "roc_auc")
final_wf <- finalize_workflow(wf, best_params)
# 8. Final fit
final_fit <- last_fit(final_wf, split)
collect_metrics(final_fit)
# 9. Predictions
predictions <- predict(final_fit$.workflow[[1]], test)
caret
library(caret)
# Train control
ctrl <- trainControl(
method = "cv",
number = 5,
classProbs = TRUE,
summaryFunction = twoClassSummary
)
# Train model
model <- train(
target ~ .,
data = train,
method = "rf",
trControl = ctrl,
tuneLength = 10,
metric = "ROC"
)
# Results
print(model)
plot(model)
# Predictions
pred <- predict(model, test)
pred_prob <- predict(model, test, type = "prob")
# Confusion matrix
confusionMatrix(pred, test$target)
# Variable importance
varImp(model)
mlr3
library(mlr3)
library(mlr3learners)
library(mlr3tuning)
# Task
task <- TaskClassif$new(id = "my_task", backend = df, target = "target")
# Learner
learner <- lrn("classif.ranger", predict_type = "prob")
# Resampling
resampling <- rsmp("cv", folds = 5)
# Benchmark
design <- benchmark_grid(
tasks = task,
learners = list(
lrn("classif.ranger"),
lrn("classif.xgboost"),
lrn("classif.log_reg")
),
resamplings = resampling
)
bmr <- benchmark(design)
bmr$aggregate(msr("classif.auc"))
# Tuning
learner <- lrn("classif.ranger",
mtry = to_tune(1, 10),
num.trees = to_tune(100, 500)
)
instance <- tune(
tuner = tnr("grid_search"),
task = task,
learner = learner,
resampling = resampling,
measure = msr("classif.auc")
)
What ships with it
13 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 184 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A 78b09a737a80
r-ml-frameworks is a skill published in the GitHub repository LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skill (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 1,023 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
model-registry-refresh
Re-verify and extend catalog/model-registry.json — the fail-closed model-name and reasoning-effort matrix scripts/model-policy.mjs validates against — via delegated Context7-backed research, orchestrator-owned registry edits, and the full validation chain; use when a policy check fails on an unregistered model, a…
databricks-ai-bi-genie
Use this skill to statically review AI/BI Genie agent and dashboard design: agent scoping (30-table limit), instructions and trusted assets, metric-view correctness, dashboard limits and rendering, benchmark design and honest accuracy reading, and the critical 'Individual data' versus 'Share data' permission decision.…
databricks-data-quality-observability
Use this skill to design and verify data quality expectations, table constraints, Lakehouse Monitoring, freshness detection, event-log interrogation, quality SLAs, and downstream quality signaling for Lakeflow pipelines. Reads pipeline source, table schema, expectations, monitor configuration, and event-log queries…
databricks-genai-agent-engineering
Use this skill to review generative-AI agent design on Databricks: Mosaic AI Agent Framework and ResponsesAgent interface, Databricks AI Search index variant and sync-mode choice, retrieval and context engineering, MCP server category and trust boundaries, external model-provider selection, and Unity AI Gateway…
databricks-genai-evaluation-observability
Use this skill to review generative-AI evaluation, tracing, and observability design on Databricks: MLflow Tracing instrumentation and span design, trace storage and governance, mlflow.genai.evaluate() harness design, the judge-versus-scorer distinction, built-in judge selection (ten single-turn and seven multi-turn)…
databricks-lakeflow-pipeline-engineering
Use this skill to design Lakeflow Spark Declarative Pipelines: medallion layering, Lakeflow Jobs orchestration and task dependencies, Delta table layout (liquid clustering, deletion vectors, Predictive Optimization), Auto Loader ingestion, schema evolution and rescueddata, materialized views versus streaming tables…