Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skill --skill r-ml-treesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-trees)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-trees"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-trees/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-trees"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/r-ml-trees.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.00782 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00391 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00156 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00078 |
Grade A, and why
r-ml-trees scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 163 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
R Tree-Based Models
Decision trees and random forests.
ranger (Fast Random Forest)
library(ranger)
# Classification
model <- ranger(
target ~ .,
data = train,
num.trees = 500,
mtry = sqrt(ncol(train) - 1),
importance = "impurity",
probability = TRUE # For probabilities
)
# Regression
model <- ranger(
target ~ .,
data = train,
num.trees = 500
)
# Predictions
pred <- predict(model, test)
pred$predictions
# Variable importance
importance(model)
sort(importance(model), decreasing = TRUE)
# OOB error
model$prediction.error
randomForest
library(randomForest)
# Train
model <- randomForest(
target ~ .,
data = train,
ntree = 500,
mtry = 3,
importance = TRUE
)
# Predictions
pred <- predict(model, test)
pred_prob <- predict(model, test, type = "prob")
# Variable importance
importance(model)
varImpPlot(model)
# Partial dependence
partialPlot(model, train, x.var = "feature")
# OOB error
model$err.rate[nrow(model$err.rate), ]
rpart (Decision Tree)
library(rpart)
library(rpart.plot)
# Train
model <- rpart(
target ~ .,
data = train,
method = "class", # or "anova" for regression
control = rpart.control(
minsplit = 20,
cp = 0.01,
maxdepth = 10
)
)
# Plot tree
rpart.plot(model, extra = 104)
# Predictions
pred <- predict(model, test, type = "class")
pred_prob <- predict(model, test, type = "prob")
# Pruning
printcp(model)
plotcp(model)
model_pruned <- prune(model, cp = 0.02)
# Variable importance
model$variable.importance
party/partykit
library(partykit)
# Conditional inference tree
model <- ctree(target ~ ., data = train)
plot(model)
# Predictions
pred <- predict(model, test)
# Random forest with conditional trees
library(party)
model <- cforest(target ~ ., data = train)
Ensemble with tidymodels
library(tidymodels)
# Random forest
rf_spec <- rand_forest(
mtry = tune(),
trees = 500,
min_n = tune()
) %>%
set_engine("ranger", importance = "impurity") %>%
set_mode("classification")
# Decision tree
tree_spec <- decision_tree(
cost_complexity = tune(),
tree_depth = tune(),
min_n = tune()
) %>%
set_engine("rpart") %>%
set_mode("classification")
# Tune
tune_results <- tune_grid(
workflow() %>% add_model(rf_spec) %>% add_formula(target ~ .),
resamples = vfold_cv(train, v = 5),
grid = 20
)
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 163 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A c45bb9ff2dd4
r-ml-trees is a skill published in the GitHub repository LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skill (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 782 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
model-registry-refresh
Re-verify and extend catalog/model-registry.json — the fail-closed model-name and reasoning-effort matrix scripts/model-policy.mjs validates against — via delegated Context7-backed research, orchestrator-owned registry edits, and the full validation chain; use when a policy check fails on an unregistered model, a…
databricks-ai-bi-genie
Use this skill to statically review AI/BI Genie agent and dashboard design: agent scoping (30-table limit), instructions and trusted assets, metric-view correctness, dashboard limits and rendering, benchmark design and honest accuracy reading, and the critical 'Individual data' versus 'Share data' permission decision.…
databricks-data-quality-observability
Use this skill to design and verify data quality expectations, table constraints, Lakehouse Monitoring, freshness detection, event-log interrogation, quality SLAs, and downstream quality signaling for Lakeflow pipelines. Reads pipeline source, table schema, expectations, monitor configuration, and event-log queries…
databricks-genai-agent-engineering
Use this skill to review generative-AI agent design on Databricks: Mosaic AI Agent Framework and ResponsesAgent interface, Databricks AI Search index variant and sync-mode choice, retrieval and context engineering, MCP server category and trust boundaries, external model-provider selection, and Unity AI Gateway…
databricks-genai-evaluation-observability
Use this skill to review generative-AI evaluation, tracing, and observability design on Databricks: MLflow Tracing instrumentation and span design, trace storage and governance, mlflow.genai.evaluate() harness design, the judge-versus-scorer distinction, built-in judge selection (ten single-turn and seven multi-turn)…
databricks-lakeflow-pipeline-engineering
Use this skill to design Lakeflow Spark Declarative Pipelines: medallion layering, Lakeflow Jobs orchestration and task dependencies, Delta table layout (liquid clustering, deletion vectors, Predictive Optimization), Auto Loader ingestion, schema evolution and rescueddata, materialized views versus streaming tables…