Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skill --skill tidymodelsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/tidymodels)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/tidymodels"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/tidymodels/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/tidymodels"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leolin990405/r-analytics-skill/tidymodels.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.01227 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00613 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00245 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00123 |
Grade A, and why
tidymodels scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 183 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
tidymodels
Tidy machine learning framework.
Workflow
library(tidymodels)
# 1. Split data
split <- initial_split(df, prop = 0.8, strata = target)
train <- training(split)
test <- testing(split)
# 2. Create recipe
recipe <- recipe(target ~ ., data = train) %>%
step_normalize(all_numeric_predictors()) %>%
step_dummy(all_nominal_predictors())
# 3. Specify model
model <- rand_forest(trees = 100) %>%
set_engine("ranger") %>%
set_mode("classification")
# 4. Create workflow
wf <- workflow() %>%
add_recipe(recipe) %>%
add_model(model)
# 5. Fit
fit <- wf %>% fit(data = train)
# 6. Predict
predictions <- predict(fit, test)
Recipes
recipe(target ~ ., data = train) %>%
# Imputation
step_impute_mean(all_numeric_predictors()) %>%
step_impute_mode(all_nominal_predictors()) %>%
step_impute_knn(all_predictors()) %>%
# Transformation
step_normalize(all_numeric_predictors()) %>%
step_scale(all_numeric_predictors()) %>%
step_center(all_numeric_predictors()) %>%
step_log(value, base = 10) %>%
step_sqrt(value) %>%
step_BoxCox(all_numeric_predictors()) %>%
step_YeoJohnson(all_numeric_predictors()) %>%
# Encoding
step_dummy(all_nominal_predictors()) %>%
step_other(category, threshold = 0.05) %>%
step_novel(all_nominal_predictors()) %>%
step_unknown(all_nominal_predictors()) %>%
# Feature engineering
step_interact(~ x1:x2) %>%
step_poly(x, degree = 2) %>%
step_ns(x, deg_free = 3) %>%
step_date(date, features = c("dow", "month", "year")) %>%
# Selection
step_zv(all_predictors()) %>%
step_nzv(all_predictors()) %>%
step_corr(all_numeric_predictors(), threshold = 0.9) %>%
step_pca(all_numeric_predictors(), num_comp = 5) %>%
step_select(x1, x2, x3)
Models (parsnip)
# Linear models
linear_reg() %>% set_engine("lm")
logistic_reg() %>% set_engine("glm")
logistic_reg(penalty = 0.1, mixture = 0.5) %>% set_engine("glmnet")
# Trees
decision_tree() %>% set_engine("rpart")
rand_forest(trees = 100, mtry = 5, min_n = 10) %>% set_engine("ranger")
boost_tree(trees = 100, learn_rate = 0.1) %>% set_engine("xgboost")
# SVM
svm_rbf(cost = 1, rbf_sigma = 0.1) %>% set_engine("kernlab")
svm_linear() %>% set_engine("kernlab")
# Neural network
mlp(hidden_units = 10, penalty = 0.01) %>% set_engine("nnet")
# Set mode
set_mode("classification")
set_mode("regression")
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 183 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 7c784eda01ca
tidymodels is a skill published in the GitHub repository LeoLin990405/r-analytics-skill (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,227 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
model-registry-refresh
Re-verify and extend catalog/model-registry.json — the fail-closed model-name and reasoning-effort matrix scripts/model-policy.mjs validates against — via delegated Context7-backed research, orchestrator-owned registry edits, and the full validation chain; use when a policy check fails on an unregistered model, a…
databricks-ai-bi-genie
Use this skill to statically review AI/BI Genie agent and dashboard design: agent scoping (30-table limit), instructions and trusted assets, metric-view correctness, dashboard limits and rendering, benchmark design and honest accuracy reading, and the critical 'Individual data' versus 'Share data' permission decision.…
databricks-data-quality-observability
Use this skill to design and verify data quality expectations, table constraints, Lakehouse Monitoring, freshness detection, event-log interrogation, quality SLAs, and downstream quality signaling for Lakeflow pipelines. Reads pipeline source, table schema, expectations, monitor configuration, and event-log queries…
databricks-genai-agent-engineering
Use this skill to review generative-AI agent design on Databricks: Mosaic AI Agent Framework and ResponsesAgent interface, Databricks AI Search index variant and sync-mode choice, retrieval and context engineering, MCP server category and trust boundaries, external model-provider selection, and Unity AI Gateway…
databricks-genai-evaluation-observability
Use this skill to review generative-AI evaluation, tracing, and observability design on Databricks: MLflow Tracing instrumentation and span design, trace storage and governance, mlflow.genai.evaluate() harness design, the judge-versus-scorer distinction, built-in judge selection (ten single-turn and seven multi-turn)…
databricks-lakeflow-pipeline-engineering
Use this skill to design Lakeflow Spark Declarative Pipelines: medallion layering, Lakeflow Jobs orchestration and task dependencies, Delta table layout (liquid clustering, deletion vectors, Predictive Optimization), Auto Loader ingestion, schema evolution and rescueddata, materialized views versus streaming tables…