literature-review-agent

literature-review-agent is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from leonardodalinky/SciDER. It costs 132 tokens per session (3,852 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of literature-review-agent, Apache-2.0.

A research-paper literature search and writing step from PaperOrchestra. It finds candidate papers, verifies their identity and date through Semantic Scholar, creates BibTeX references, and drafts the introduction and related-work sections.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to discover and verify papers, build a citation pool and refs.bib, and write introduction and related-work sections while preserving the rest of a LaTeX template.
Why use it?
It reduces the chance of citing the wrong paper, duplicate records, or work outside the required date range. It also turns a search plan and project notes into the first sections of a paper.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: mentions Claude Code.

Good fit Use it to discover and verify papers, build a citation pool and refs.bib, and write introduction and related-work sections while preserving the rest of a LaTeX template.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/leonardodalinky/scider/literature-review-agent
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add leonardodalinky/SciDER --skill literature-review-agent
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/leonardodalinky/SciDER

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for literature-review-agent

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leonardodalinky/scider/literature-review-agent/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leonardodalinky/scider/literature-review-agent)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leonardodalinky/scider/literature-review-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leonardodalinky/scider/literature-review-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for literature-review-agent

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leonardodalinky/scider/literature-review-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leonardodalinky/scider/literature-review-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 132 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,852 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 98% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00132 $0.03852
Opus 5 $0.00066 $0.01926
Sonnet 5 $0.00026 $0.00770
Haiku 4.5 $0.00013 $0.00385

Measured 12d ago against content hash b0fde92518d4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

literature-review-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 11 executable files (scripts/bibtex_format.py, scripts/check_cutoff.py, scripts/citation_coverage.py, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

98% identical to literature-review-agent — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

.scider/skills/literature-review-agent/SKILL.md · 358 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 358 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Literature Review Agent (Step 3)

Faithful implementation of the Hybrid Literature Agent from PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018, §4 Step 3, App. D.3, App. F.1 p.46).

Cost: ~20–30 LLM calls. This is one of the two longest steps (the other is plotting). Wall-time floor is set by Semantic Scholar's 1 QPS verification limit.

Inputs

  • workspace/outline.json — specifically intro_related_work_plan with the Introduction search directions and the 2-4 Related Work methodology clusters
  • workspace/inputs/conference_guidelines.md — used to derive cutoff_date
  • workspace/inputs/idea.md, workspace/inputs/experimental_log.md — for framing the Intro and grounding the Related Work positioning

Outputs

  • workspace/citation_pool.json — verified Semantic Scholar metadata for every paper that survived verification
  • workspace/refs.bib — BibTeX file generated from the verified pool
  • workspace/drafts/intro_relwork.tex — drafted Introduction and Related Work sections, written into the template, with the rest of the template preserved verbatim

Two-phase pipeline (App. D.3)

PHASE 1 — Parallel Candidate Discovery
   For each search direction in introduction_strategy.search_directions:
   For each limitation_search_query in each related_work cluster:
     - Use the host's web search tool to discover up to ~10 candidate papers.
     - Run up to 10 discovery queries in parallel (host-permitting).
     - Collect (title, snippet, url) tuples — no verification yet.
   → PRE-DEDUP before Phase 2 (see Step 1.5 below)

PHASE 2 — Sequential Citation Verification (1 QPS, with cache)
   For each candidate (after pre-dedup), sequentially:
     0. Check s2_cache.json first (scripts/s2_cache.py --check).
        If HIT: use cached response, skip live S2 call. No throttle needed.
        If MISS: proceed with live request below.
     1. Query Semantic Scholar by title:
          GET https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/search?query=<title>
              &fields=title,abstract,year,authors,venue,externalIds&limit=5
        (Public endpoint, no key. Throttle to 1 QPS for live requests only.)
     2. Store the S2 response in cache: s2_cache.py --store.
     3. Pick the top hit. Check Levenshtein title ratio against the original
        candidate title. If ratio < 70: discard.
     4. Bonus: if year and venue exactly align with hints, add a +5 point
        match-quality bonus.
     5. Require: abstract is non-empty.
     6. Require: paper.year (or month if known) strictly predates cutoff_date.
        Months default to day-1: e.g., "October 2024" → 2024-10-01.
     7. If all checks pass, add to verified pool.
   After all candidates are verified, dedup by Semantic Scholar paperId.

Read the full file on GitHub · 358 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 358 lines · 132 tokens per session scan A b0fde92518d4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

literature-review-agent is a skill published in the GitHub repository leonardodalinky/SciDER (88 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 132 tokens to every session and 3,852 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 98% identical to literature-review-agent, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

drawio-reconstruction

Reconstructs reference images into high-fidelity, editable Draw.io files with rendered previews: native Draw.io elements carry text and structure, SVG covers simple icons that match the reference, and cropped or transparent PNGs preserve complex visuals. Use when the user wants a diagram image, research figure…

HKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills · 102 tokens

idea-evaluator

Evaluates a preliminary research idea against a five-dimension framework (Higher, Faster, Stronger, Cheaper, Broader) plus idea-lifecycle and student-capability matching, paradigm-shift probing, and a fatal-flaws audit. Returns a reviewer-style verdict; non-STEM ideas route to substitute frameworks. Use when the user…

HKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills · 123 tokens

paper-writer

Drafts publishable paper prose from the author's own materials, from a single paragraph to a full manuscript, across STEM and non-STEM fields. Every factual claim traces to user input, verified retrieval, or field common knowledge; citations pass an independent verification ladder; delivery is clean prose with zero…

HKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills · 90 tokens

pre-submission-reviewer

Runs a pre-submission review of a technical paper across five dimensions: macro logic, writing details, English grammar, LaTeX formatting, and figure quality. Uses a reviewer-style severity taxonomy (CRITICAL / MAJOR / MINOR) and flags banned AI-tone vocabulary and em-dash misuse. Use when the user asks to 'review…

HKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills · 104 tokens

benchmark-paper-template

Structures Benchmark and Evaluation papers using the five-pillar framework (Research Gap, Construction Pipeline, Evaluation Framework, Empirical Findings, optional Companion Method). Returns a completeness audit, a six-part Introduction logic chain, a Section 2-7 skeleton, and a pre-submission checklist. Use when…

HKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills · 96 tokens

deep-research

Runs a deep, survey-grade literature investigation on a research topic: freezes research questions, searches from multiple adversarial perspectives, verifies every citation, synthesizes evidence into a MECE taxonomy with in-sentence cross-comparison, and answers the research questions in an evidence-first report. Use…

HKUSTDial/Supervisor-Skills · 91 tokens