literature-review-agent

literature-review-agent is a skill for Codex from appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI. It costs 132 tokens per session (3,846 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A literature-review tool that finds research papers, checks their metadata through Semantic Scholar, removes duplicates, and drafts the Introduction and Related Work sections. Semantic Scholar is a service that indexes academic papers and their citations.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to build a verified citation pool, generate a BibTeX file, and draft literature-review sections in LaTeX.
Why use it?
It reduces the work of searching for relevant papers, verifying references, and turning them into a structured literature review.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: installed under .codex/. Also seen: mentions Claude Code.

Good fit Use it to build a verified citation pool, generate a BibTeX file, and draft literature-review sections in LaTeX.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/appleweiping/weiping_wiki/literature-review-agent
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI --skill literature-review-agent
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for literature-review-agent

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/appleweiping/weiping_wiki/literature-review-agent/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/appleweiping/weiping_wiki/literature-review-agent)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/appleweiping/weiping_wiki/literature-review-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/appleweiping/weiping_wiki/literature-review-agent/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for literature-review-agent

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/appleweiping/weiping_wiki/literature-review-agent"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/appleweiping/weiping_wiki/literature-review-agent.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 132 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,846 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 3 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium Excessive Agency · line 41
    Skill enables autonomous high-impact decisions without human-in-the-loop verification. Critical operations (destructive commands, financial transactions, data deletion) should require explicit user confirmation.
    Fix: Add human-in-the-loop confirmation for destructive, irreversible, or high-impact operations. Never auto-execute commands that modify files, send data, or alter system state.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 50
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
  • medium Data Exfiltration · line 172
    Data is being sent to an external URL. This could be legitimate telemetry or data exfiltration. Manual review is recommended.
    Fix: Verify the destination URL is trusted and necessary. Remove or replace with documented APIs. Ensure no secrets, tokens, or PII are transmitted.
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00132 $0.03846
Opus 5 $0.00066 $0.01923
Sonnet 5 $0.00026 $0.00769
Haiku 4.5 $0.00013 $0.00385

Measured 9d ago against content hash 2f14ea35fc1e, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

literature-review-agent scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

The scan reads SKILL.md. This mod also ships 11 executable files (scripts/bibtex_format.py, scripts/check_cutoff.py, scripts/citation_coverage.py, …), listed below but not scanned — reading those needs a real analyzer, not pattern matching.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

3 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.codex/skills/literature-review-agent/SKILL.md · 357 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 357 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Literature Review Agent (Step 3)

Faithful implementation of the Hybrid Literature Agent from PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018, §4 Step 3, App. D.3, App. F.1 p.46).

Cost: ~20–30 LLM calls. This is one of the two longest steps (the other is plotting). Wall-time floor is set by Semantic Scholar's 1 QPS verification limit.

Inputs

  • workspace/outline.json — specifically intro_related_work_plan with the Introduction search directions and the 2-4 Related Work methodology clusters
  • workspace/inputs/conference_guidelines.md — used to derive cutoff_date
  • workspace/inputs/idea.md, workspace/inputs/experimental_log.md — for framing the Intro and grounding the Related Work positioning

Outputs

  • workspace/citation_pool.json — verified Semantic Scholar metadata for every paper that survived verification
  • workspace/refs.bib — BibTeX file generated from the verified pool
  • workspace/drafts/intro_relwork.tex — drafted Introduction and Related Work sections, written into the template, with the rest of the template preserved verbatim

Two-phase pipeline (App. D.3)

PHASE 1 — Parallel Candidate Discovery
   For each search direction in introduction_strategy.search_directions:
   For each limitation_search_query in each related_work cluster:
     - Use the host's web search tool to discover up to ~10 candidate papers.
     - Run up to 10 discovery queries in parallel (host-permitting).
     - Collect (title, snippet, url) tuples — no verification yet.
   → PRE-DEDUP before Phase 2 (see Step 1.5 below)

PHASE 2 — Sequential Citation Verification (1 QPS, with cache)
   For each candidate (after pre-dedup), sequentially:
     0. Check s2_cache.json first (scripts/s2_cache.py --check).
        If HIT: use cached response, skip live S2 call. No throttle needed.
        If MISS: proceed with live request below.
     1. Query Semantic Scholar by title:
          GET https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/search?query=<title>
              &fields=title,abstract,year,authors,venue,externalIds&limit=5
        (Public endpoint, no key. Throttle to 1 QPS for live requests only.)
     2. Store the S2 response in cache: s2_cache.py --store.
     3. Pick the top hit. Check Levenshtein title ratio against the original
        candidate title. If ratio < 70: discard.
     4. Bonus: if year and venue exactly align with hints, add a +5 point
        match-quality bonus.
     5. Require: abstract is non-empty.
     6. Require: paper.year (or month if known) strictly predates cutoff_date.
        Months default to day-1: e.g., "October 2024" → 2024-10-01.
     7. If all checks pass, add to verified pool.
   After all candidates are verified, dedup by Semantic Scholar paperId.

Read the full file on GitHub · 357 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 357 lines · 132 tokens per session scan A 2f14ea35fc1e

Subscribe to this mod's changes

literature-review-agent is a skill published in the GitHub repository appleweiping/WEIPING_WIKI (122 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 132 tokens to every session and 3,846 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

instrument-data-to-allotrope

Convert laboratory instrument output files (PDF, CSV, Excel, TXT) to Allotrope Simple Model (ASM) JSON format or flattened 2D CSV. Use this skill when scientists need to standardize instrument data for LIMS systems, data lakes, or downstream analysis. Supports auto-detection of instrument types. Outputs include full…

anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins · 123 tokens

matlab

Build, review, migrate, and safely plan MATLAB or GNU Octave numerical workflows, including arrays, tabular/time data, tests, projects, graphics, MAT files, and explicit Python interoperability.

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills · 42 tokens

exploratory-data-analysis

Perform bounded, local exploratory analysis of explicitly supported scientific files. Use for redacted CSV/TSV/JSON profiles; optional NumPy, HDF5, FASTA/FASTQ, and basic image metadata inspection; missingness/leakage audits; outlier and transformation sensitivity; and rigorous EDA report scaffolds. Other domain…

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills · 83 tokens

phylogenetics

Build and analyze phylogenetic trees using MAFFT (multiple alignment), IQ-TREE 2 (maximum likelihood), and FastTree (fast NJ/ML). Visualize with ETE3 or FigTree. For evolutionary analysis, microbial genomics, viral phylodynamics, protein family analysis, and molecular clock studies.

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills · 68 tokens

research-engineer

An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 43 tokens

mapping-to-snomed

Maps clinical concept spans extracted by OpenMed to SNOMED CT concepts through a USER-SUPPLIED terminology server (the user's own Ontoserver, Snowstorm, or UMLS/UTS), never a bundled vocabulary. Use when the user wants to code findings, disorders, procedures, body structures, or substances to SNOMED CT, run an ECL…

maziyarpanahi/openmed · 205 tokens