OpenClaw Master Skills is a curated, regularly updated collection of skills that extends an AI personal assistant platform with capabilities such as research, browser automation, presentation creation, and prompt work. It is intended for people using OpenClaw or MyClaw.ai to give their agents additional tasks and workflows. The catalogue contains many skills and agents from this collection.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills --skill ai-powered-literature-review-skillsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/ai-powered-literature-review-skills)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/ai-powered-literature-review-skills"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/ai-powered-literature-review-skills/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/ai-powered-literature-review-skills"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/leoyeai/openclaw-master-skills/ai-powered-literature-review-skills.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector warn
SkillSpector: 1 finding, up to high
These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →
- high Tool Misuse · line 745 Tool calls are chained to bypass individual safety checks or escalate capabilities beyond what any single tool call would allow.Fix: Limit tool chaining depth and validate the output of each tool before passing it to the next. Require explicit user approval for multi-step chains.
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00147 | $0.06022 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00073 | $0.03011 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.01204 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00602 |
Grade A, and why
literature-reviewer-skill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- literature-reviewer-skill — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 811 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
文献回顾(Literature Survey)
根据用户提供的论文主题,进行系统性的中英文文献检索、整理和综述撰写。 采用 8阶段工作流,无需API配置,通过浏览器自动化获取文献。
8阶段工作流
Phase 0: Session Log → 创建会话目录
Phase 1: Query Analysis → 生成中英文检索策略
Phase 2: Parallel Search → 浏览器自动化检索
Phase 3: Deduplication → 标题相似度去重
Phase 4: Verification → 基础元数据校验
Phase 5: Data Export → 导出文献信息
Phase 6: Paper Analysis → 单篇文献深度分析
Phase 7: Citation Format → GB/T 7714-2015格式化
Phase 8: Synthesis → 生成综述文档
Phase 0: Session Log(会话管理)
创建会话目录,记录工作进度。
目录结构:
sessions/{YYYYMMDD}_{topic_short}/
├── session_log.md # 工作日志
├── metadata.json # 会话元数据
├── papers_raw.json # 原始检索结果
├── papers_deduplicated.json # 去重后文献
├── papers_analysis.json # 文献分析结果
└── output/
├── references.md # 文献清单(含摘要)
├── papers_analysis.md # 单篇文献分析
└── literature_review.md # 最终综述
Phase 1: Query Analysis(查询分析)
AI 智能分析研究主题,生成相关关键词和检索策略。
AI 提示词模板
You are tasked with generating relevant keywords or phrases for a given research direction.
The research direction is provided below:
<research_direction>
{{用户输入的研究主题}}
</research_direction>
To complete this task:
1. Carefully analyze the provided research direction.
2. Identify core concepts, methods, techniques, or topics in this research area.
3. Generate 5 to 8 of the most relevant and representative keywords or phrases.
4. Ensure keywords are concise, typically 1-3 words each.
5. Make sure the keywords cover different aspects of the research direction.
6. Order the keywords by importance or relevance.
7. Separate keywords with English commas (,).
8. Do not include any explanations, descriptions, or additional text.
9. Provide keywords in both Chinese and English.
Present your result in the following format:
中文关键词:keyword1, keyword2, keyword3, ...
英文关键词:english_keyword1, english_keyword2, english_keyword3, ...
Example for "人工智能在医疗诊断中的应用":
中文关键词:人工智能, 医疗诊断, 机器学习, 深度学习, 医学影像, 辅助诊断, 疾病预测, 智能诊疗
英文关键词:artificial intelligence, medical diagnosis, machine learning, deep learning, medical imaging, computer-aided diagnosis, disease prediction, intelligent diagnosis
What ships with it
18 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- _meta.json 316 B
- AGENTS.md 13 KB
- agents/explore-agent.md 4.2 KB
- agents/orchestrator.md 17 KB
- agents/synthesize-agent.md 12 KB
- agents/verify-agent.md 2.3 KB
- docker-compose.yml 3.3 KB
- install.yaml 2.6 KB
- mcp.json 5.6 KB
- README.md 20 KB
- references/cnki-guide.md 10 KB
- references/database-access.md 3.1 KB
- references/gb-t-7714-2015.md 11 KB
- scripts/__init__.py 519 B runs code
- scripts/citation_formatter.py 5.3 KB runs code
- scripts/deduplicate_papers.py 4.8 KB runs code
- scripts/models.py 2.6 KB runs code
- SECURITY.md 5.1 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 811 lines · 147 tokens per session scan A 1338398815a8
literature-reviewer-skill is a skill published in the GitHub repository LeoYeAI/openclaw-master-skills (2,141 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 147 tokens to every session and 6,022 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
gsmm-builder
Build or load a genome-scale metabolic model (GSMM) using COBRApy. Covers loading from BIGG, constructing minimal models from scratch, setting medium constraints, and exporting validated .json model files.
mixed-precision
Use FP16/BF16 mixed precision to accelerate training and reduce memory. Use when optimizing GPU performance.
comfyui-skill-openclaw
Run registered ComfyUI workflows through the fast comfyui-skill CLI, and use the official local Comfy MCP for live template, node, model, validation, and orchestration capabilities. Use this Skill when: (1) The user requests to "generate an image", "draw a picture", or "execute a ComfyUI workflow". (2) The user has…
hypothesis-testing
Applies the scientific method to debugging by helping users form specific, testable hypotheses, design targeted experiments, and systematically confirm or reject theories to find root causes. Use when a user says their code isn't working, they're getting an error, something broke, they want to troubleshoot a bug, or…
research-writing
A collection of 30 prompt templates for writing and reviewing scientific papers. It covers tasks such as translating, editing, summarizing research, writing sections, creating figure captions, and preparing reviewer replies.
statistical-analysis
Perform rigorous statistical analysis on SWARM experiment data with multiple-comparison corrections.