ai-threat-assessment

ai-threat-assessment is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from LgrappaG/Workflows-Agents. It costs 13 tokens per session (258 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A guide for evaluating threats in changing AI responses, such as deciding which dangers an AI-controlled character should treat as important.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to configure threat evaluation, test unusual or error cases, and check its effect on performance and game difficulty.
Why use it?
It helps keep threat decisions balanced so responses are neither inappropriate nor frustrating for players.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to configure threat evaluation, test unusual or error cases, and check its effect on performance and game difficulty.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/lgrappag/workflows-agents/ai-threat-assessment
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add LgrappaG/Workflows-Agents --skill ai-threat-assessment
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/LgrappaG/Workflows-Agents

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for ai-threat-assessment

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lgrappag/workflows-agents/ai-threat-assessment/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lgrappag/workflows-agents/ai-threat-assessment)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lgrappag/workflows-agents/ai-threat-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lgrappag/workflows-agents/ai-threat-assessment/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for ai-threat-assessment

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lgrappag/workflows-agents/ai-threat-assessment"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lgrappag/workflows-agents/ai-threat-assessment.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 13 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 258 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00013 $0.00258
Opus 5 $0.00006 $0.00129
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00052
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00026

Measured 10d ago against content hash de2e6139cd6b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

ai-threat-assessment scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

skills/ai-threat-assessment/SKILL.md · 49 lines

What it actually says

Ai Threat Assessment

Implement threat evaluation system for dynamic AI responses

Risk Level

MEDIUM

Core Rules

  • Tune threat evaluation
  • balance difficulty
  • Test thoroughly before deploying

Response Pattern

When Using This Skill

  1. Configure threat system
  2. Validate the implementation
  3. Test edge cases and error conditions
  4. Ensure performance meets requirements

Usage Contexts

  • AI decision making
  • threat prioritization

What NOT to Do

  • Inappropriate threat response
  • player frustration
  • Deploy without testing

Key Requirements

  • Understand the use cases before application
  • Follow the documented response pattern
  • Validate results in the target environment
  • Monitor for performance impact

Further Learning

Review related skills and documentation for deeper understanding of related systems and best practices.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 49 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A de2e6139cd6b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

ai-threat-assessment is a skill published in the GitHub repository LgrappaG/Workflows-Agents (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 258 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories