Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus --skill cross-functional-collaborationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus/cross-functional-collaboration)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus/cross-functional-collaboration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus/cross-functional-collaboration/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus/cross-functional-collaboration"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus/cross-functional-collaboration.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.01918 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00959 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00384 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00192 |
Grade A, and why
cross-functional-collaboration scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 126 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Cross-functional Collaboration
Scope
Covers
- Leading a cross-functional initiative (Product/Engineering/Design/Data/Marketing/Ops/etc.)
- Turning “we’re misaligned” into explicit goals, roles, decisions, and operating cadence
- Reducing rework and conflict via shared artifacts (docs/prototypes) and clear decision rights
- Building trust through conflict norms and credit/recognition practices
When to use
- “We keep thrashing between PM/Eng/Design—set up a better way of working.”
- “Create a collaboration charter: roles, responsibilities, decision-making, and cadence.”
- “We need to work better with Engineering/Design/Data on .”
- “Our cross-functional project is slow due to unclear ownership and decisions.”
When NOT to use
- You need to define the underlying product problem first (use
problem-definition). - You need a full decision process for a single high-stakes decision (use
running-decision-processes). - The issue is primarily a performance or accountability problem with an individual (use
having-difficult-conversations). - You only need a timeline/milestone plan (use
managing-timelines). - You want to get buy-in from a specific stakeholder or exec on a one-time decision (use
stakeholder-alignment). - You want to build influence or set expectations with your own manager (use
managing-up). - You need to design recurring team ceremonies like standups, retros, or demos (use
team-rituals).
Inputs
Minimum required
- Initiative summary: what it is, why now, desired outcomes, and timeframe
- Functions/teams involved + key stakeholders (including any required subject matter experts)
- Current symptoms: where collaboration is breaking down (examples help)
- Constraints: deadlines, non-negotiables, policies/compliance, customer commitments
Missing-info strategy
- Ask up to 5 questions from references/INTAKE.md.
- If answers aren’t available, proceed with explicit assumptions and label unknowns.
What ships with it
13 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- eval/eval_config.json 503 B
- eval/SHOWCASE.md 4.6 KB
- eval/with_skill.md 28 KB
- eval/without_skill.md 17 KB
- README.md 1.6 KB
- references/CHECKLISTS.md 1.8 KB
- references/EXAMPLES.md 1.6 KB
- references/INTAKE.md 1.4 KB
- references/RUBRIC.md 2.9 KB
- references/SOURCE_SUMMARY.md 1.9 KB
- references/TEMPLATES.md 4.0 KB
- references/WORKFLOW.md 3.7 KB
- skillpack.json 406 B
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 126 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 1477e93d2991
cross-functional-collaboration is a skill published in the GitHub repository liqiongyu/lenny_skills_plus (52 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 1,918 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
exec-weekly-agenda-generator
Synthesize the past week across meetings, chat, email, and calendar to generate a ranked list of 5-10 topics for the weekly leadership team meeting. Use when the user asks to prep for their leadership meeting, generate meeting topics, build the agenda, or says "prep me for Monday.".
persona-event-coordinator
Plan and manage events — scheduling, invitations, and logistics.
persona-project-manager
Coordinate projects — track tasks, schedule meetings, and share docs.
persona-team-lead
Lead a team — run standups, coordinate tasks, and communicate.
recipe-plan-weekly-schedule
Review your Google Calendar week, identify gaps, and add events to fill them.
recipe-review-overdue-tasks
Find Google Tasks that are past due and need attention.