Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Lord1Egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit --skill bidsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lord1Egypt/scientific-agent-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/bids)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/bids"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/bids/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/bids"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/bids.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00080 | $0.08306 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00032 | $0.03322 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00016 | $0.01661 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00831 |
Grade A, and why
bids scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
97% identical to bids — 3 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 757 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS)
Overview
The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a community standard for organizing and describing neuroscience and biomedical research datasets. It defines a consistent file naming convention, directory hierarchy, and metadata schema so that datasets are immediately understandable by humans and software tools alike. BIDS is governed by the BIDS Specification (currently v1.11.x) and is maintained by the community via the BIDS-Standard GitHub organization.
While BIDS originated for MRI, it has grown well beyond neuroimaging. The specification now covers 11 modalities spanning imaging, electrophysiology, and behavioral data:
- Imaging: MRI (structural, functional, diffusion, fieldmaps, perfusion/ASL), PET, microscopy
- Electrophysiology: EEG, MEG, iEEG (intracranial EEG), EMG
- Other: NIRS (near-infrared spectroscopy), motion capture, behavioral data (without imaging), MR spectroscopy
Active BEPs are extending BIDS further — notably BEP032 (microelectrode electrophysiology) will add support for extracellular recordings including Neuropixels probes, bringing BIDS to a prevalent methodology in animal neuroscience research (see also the neuropixels-analysis skill).
Adoption is required or strongly encouraged by major data repositories (OpenNeuro, DANDI), leading journals (NeuroImage, Human Brain Mapping, Scientific Data), and funding agencies (NIH, ERC).
The Python ecosystem for BIDS centers on PyBIDS (pybids) for querying and indexing BIDS datasets, and the bids-validator (Deno-based, available as PyPI package bids-validator-deno or via Deno directly) for compliance checking. Conversion from DICOM is typically done with HeuDiConv, dcm2bids, or BIDScoin.
When to Use This Skill
Apply this skill when:
- Organizing raw neuroscience data (imaging, electrophysiology, behavioral) into BIDS-compliant directory structures
- Querying an existing BIDS dataset to find specific files by subject, session, task, run, or modality
- Validating a dataset against the BIDS specification before sharing or submission
- Converting DICOM data from scanners into BIDS format
- Writing or editing JSON sidecar metadata files
- Creating BIDS-compliant derivatives (preprocessed data, analysis outputs)
- Setting up a
dataset_description.jsonfor a new dataset - Working with BIDS entities (subject, session, task, acquisition, run, etc.)
- Configuring
.bidsignoreto exclude files from validation - Preparing data for upload to OpenNeuro, DANDI, or other BIDS-aware repositories
What ships with it
6 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 757 lines · 80 tokens per session scan A 90b8e4099178
bids is a skill published in the GitHub repository Lord1Egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit (3 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 80 tokens to every session and 8,306 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 97% identical to bids, differing in 3 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
alterlab-qiime2-amplicon
Runs 16S/ITS amplicon (microbiome) analysis with the QIIME 2 distribution (2026.7; the "amplicon" distribution was renamed "qiime2" in 2026.4) in the correct order: manifest import, cutadapt trim-paired primer removal BEFORE dada2 denoise-paired (trunc-len chosen from the demux quality .qzv), feature-classifier…
audit-ml-pipeline
Read-only audit of one persisted skore report: audit/NN .py (jupytext percent), 1:1 with experiments/ and journal/. Do not execute it. Run materialize.py once. Never call skore.evaluate or project.put. TRIGGER when a completed run needs an audit, the user asks to audit, show, or re-audit an experiment, a re-run…
evaluate-ml-pipeline
Evaluate one learner with skore.evaluate. The splitter and any non-default score are already on the DataOp from build-ml-pipeline. This skill writes the call without splitter=, persists the report, and records the locator. When the locked split is the training table and test table that shipped with the data, fit on…
model-ml-pipeline
Deterministic entry point for modeling. On a first landing, write the locked baseline design note and ask for approval. Later landings offer only the choices the workspace justifies (an EDA proposal, Backlog, discussion). A missing modeling lock loads frame-ml-problem and stops. After a design is approved, coordinate…
frame-ml-problem
Record the problem, the deployment setting, the comparison metric, the baseline, and the fold count in the journal before model code. Ask every missing decision in one turn, from frame show. Does not write Python, estimator hyperparameters, or splitter constructors. TRIGGER when the user asks which metric to compare…
alterlab-deep-research
Runs a 13-agent deep research pipeline for rigorous academic work on any topic across 7 modes (full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis), covering research-question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology…