Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lord1Egypt/scientific-agent-toolkitnpx agentmods add skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/peer-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/peer-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/peer-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/peer-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/peer-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lord1egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit/peer-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00071 | $0.04548 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.02274 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00910 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00455 |
Grade A, and why
peer-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to peer-review — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 570 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scientific Critical Evaluation and Peer Review
Overview
Peer review is a systematic process for evaluating scientific manuscripts. Assess methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting standards. Apply this skill for manuscript and grant review across disciplines with constructive, rigorous evaluation.
When to Use This Skill
This skill should be used when:
- Conducting peer review of scientific manuscripts for journals
- Evaluating grant proposals and research applications
- Assessing methodology and experimental design rigor
- Reviewing statistical analyses and reporting standards
- Evaluating reproducibility and data availability
- Checking compliance with reporting guidelines (CONSORT, STROBE, PRISMA)
- Providing constructive feedback on scientific writing
Visual Enhancement with Scientific Schematics
When creating documents with this skill, always consider adding scientific diagrams and schematics to enhance visual communication.
If your document does not already contain schematics or diagrams:
- Use the scientific-schematics skill to generate AI-powered publication-quality diagrams
- Simply describe your desired diagram in natural language
- Nano Banana Pro will automatically generate, review, and refine the schematic
For new documents: Scientific schematics should be generated by default to visually represent key concepts, workflows, architectures, or relationships described in the text.
How to generate schematics:
python scripts/generate_schematic.py "your diagram description" -o figures/output.png
The AI will automatically:
- Create publication-quality images with proper formatting
- Review and refine through multiple iterations
- Ensure accessibility (colorblind-friendly, high contrast)
- Save outputs in the figures/ directory
When to add schematics:
- Peer review workflow diagrams
- Evaluation criteria decision trees
- Review process flowcharts
- Methodology assessment frameworks
- Quality assessment visualizations
- Reporting guidelines compliance diagrams
- Any complex concept that benefits from visualization
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 570 lines · 71 tokens per session scan A 2f84af57ee30
peer-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Lord1Egypt/scientific-agent-toolkit (3 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 71 tokens to every session and 4,548 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to peer-review, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
cellxgene-census-query
Query CZ CELLxGENE Census (61M+ cells). Filter by cell type/tissue/disease, retrieve expression data, and integrate with scanpy/PyTorch for population-scale single-cell analysis. Use this skill when: (1) Querying single-cell expression data by cell type, tissue, or disease, (2) Exploring available single-cell datasets…
alterlab-deep-research
Runs a 13-agent deep research pipeline for rigorous academic work on any topic across 7 modes (full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis), covering research-question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology…
alterlab-imaging-data-commons
Query and download public cancer imaging data from the NCI Imaging Data Commons (IDC) using the idc-index Python package, filtering by metadata, visualizing in-browser, and checking licenses, with no authentication required. Use when obtaining large-scale radiology (CT, MR, PET) or digital pathology DICOM datasets for…
alterlab-pyhealth
Develops, tests, and deploys clinical machine learning models with the PyHealth healthcare AI toolkit. Use when working with electronic health records (EHR), clinical prediction tasks (mortality, readmission, drug recommendation), medical coding systems (ICD, NDC, ATC), physiological signals (EEG, ECG), healthcare…
alterlab-cobrapy
Build and analyze genome-scale constraint-based metabolic models with COBRApy — flux balance analysis (FBA), flux variability analysis (FVA), gene and reaction knockouts, flux sampling, and SBML model I/O. Use when simulating metabolic networks, predicting growth or knockout phenotypes, or running systems-biology and…
alterlab-deeptools
Process and visualize deep-sequencing coverage with the deepTools CLI — convert BAM to bigWig (bamCoverage), build log2 ratio tracks (bamCompare), run QC (multiBamSummary correlation, PCA, plotFingerprint), apply the ATAC-seq Tn5 shift (alignmentSieve --ATACshift), and make TSS/peak heatmaps and profiles…