health-check

health-check is a skill for Claude Code from ludo-technologies/pyscn. It costs 49 tokens per session (419 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A tool for measuring the overall quality of Python code with pyscn, which reports a score from 0 to 100, a letter grade, and several code-quality categories.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when assessing Python code health, reviewing complexity, duplication, dead code, dependencies, or architecture. It can produce machine-readable details and save fuller reports for inspection.
Why use it?
It gives a quick overview of technical debt and shows which areas or files most need attention. It can also compare code quality before and after a refactor.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code plugin manifest.

Part of the pyscn-mcp plugin — 4 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it when assessing Python code health, reviewing complexity, duplication, dead code, dependencies, or architecture. It can produce machine-readable details and save fuller reports for inspection.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/ludo-technologies/pyscn/health-check
About the project

pyscn is a Python code-quality analyzer that examines dead code, duplication, complexity, hotspots, architecture, dependencies, and class design, then reports which areas need attention. It is used to maintain and refactor codebases, including AI-generated code, and provides agent skills for health checks, architecture reviews, refactoring, and CI reports.

ludo-technologies/pyscn · 1,056 stars · on GitHub · docs.codescan.dev

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ludo-technologies/pyscn --skill health-check
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ludo-technologies/pyscn

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install pyscn-mcp, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 4 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for health-check

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ludo-technologies/pyscn/health-check/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/ludo-technologies/pyscn/health-check)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ludo-technologies/pyscn/health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ludo-technologies/pyscn/health-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for health-check

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/ludo-technologies/pyscn/health-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/ludo-technologies/pyscn/health-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 49 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 419 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector warn 7 Sept 2026
SkillSpector: 2 findings, up to medium

These are SkillSpector’s own severities. On a checked sample its high-severity flags on skills were ~96% false positives — a documented command, a public API, a “never do X” rule — so we show them as a caution to read, not a verdict. Why →

  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 11
    uvx/uv tool run commands without ==version create a rug-pull risk.
    Fix: Pin the version: uvx package-name==1.2.3
  • medium MCP Rug Pull · line 20
    uvx/uv tool run commands without ==version create a rug-pull risk.
    Fix: Pin the version: uvx package-name==1.2.3
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00049 $0.00419
Opus 5 $0.00024 $0.00210
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00084
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00042

Measured 11d ago against content hash a55a96cd62de, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

health-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude-plugin/pyscn-mcp/skills/health-check/SKILL.md · 37 lines

What it actually says

Python Code Health Check with pyscn

Run the pyscn CLI to give a quick, quantified picture of code quality. No install needed:

uvx pyscn@latest analyze <path>

The summary output includes a health score (0-100), a letter grade (A-F), and per-category metrics.

Commands

User Request Command
"How healthy is this code?" uvx pyscn@latest analyze <path>
"Give me a quality overview" Same command; walk through the category breakdown
"Did my refactoring improve quality?" Run before and after, compare scores

For machine-readable detail add --json. Report files are NOT written to stdout. They go to .pyscn/reports/ under the current working directory and the path is printed on completion; read that file.

Interpreting Results

  • Score 0-100 with letter grade; category breakdowns cover complexity, dead code, duplication, coupling (CBO), cohesion (LCOM), dependencies, and architecture.
  • Lead with the grade and the weakest categories, then name the top offenders (files/functions) driving them.
  • For deeper follow-up, hand off to the focused skills: refactoring targets → refactoring, module structure → architecture-review.

Always explain the score in plain terms and suggest the highest-impact next step.

MCP Alternative

If the pyscn-mcp MCP server is connected, you can use its tools instead of the CLI: get_health_score (score + grade) or analyze_code (output_mode: "summary" gives the health score plus high-level metrics per category). Results are returned inline with no report files.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 37 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A a55a96cd62de

Subscribe to this mod's changes

health-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository ludo-technologies/pyscn (1,056 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 419 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

erase

Guided cleanup of CodeEraser findings — read the reports, verify every candidate against the actual code, delete safely, and prove convergence with ce check. Invoke when the user asks to clean up duplication, dead code, or act on CodeEraser findings.

skymanbp/CodeEraser · 56 tokens

mypy

Skill "mypy" from bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills, covering mypy - static type checking for python, basic mypy, with common type stubs, for fastapi projects and for django projects.

bobmatnyc/claude-mpm-skills · 24 tokens

mypy

Skill "mypy" from bobmatnyc/claude-mpm, covering mypy - static type checking for python, basic mypy, with common type stubs, for fastapi projects and for django projects.

bobmatnyc/claude-mpm · 24 tokens

developing-with-streamlit

Use for ALL Streamlit tasks: creating, editing, debugging, beautifying, styling, theming, optimizing, or deploying Streamlit apps. Also custom components, st.components.v2, HTML/JS/CSS work. Discovers and loads version-matched reference docs from the user's installed Streamlit (>=1.57). Triggers: streamlit, st.…

streamlit/streamlit · 128 tokens

python-code-quality

Code quality checks, linting, formatting, and type checking commands for the Agent Framework Python codebase. Use this when running checks, fixing lint errors, or troubleshooting CI failures.

microsoft/agent-framework · 40 tokens

eve

Build durable backend AI agents with the eve framework. Use when creating, editing, or debugging an eve project — agent instructions, skills, tools, connections, channels, sandboxes, subagents, schedules, or evals.

ComposioHQ/composio · 47 tokens