Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills --skill scientific-writinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/scientific-writing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/scientific-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/scientific-writing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/scientific-writing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/scientific-writing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.03004 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.01502 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00601 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00300 |
Grade A, and why
scientific-writing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to scientific-writing — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 374 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Scientific Writing
Purpose
Produce clear scientific prose without inventing evidence or concealing uncertainty. Keep drafting, evidence verification, and submission approval as separate stages.
The accountable human authors control scientific decisions and final approval. AI is not an author, and generated fluency is never evidence [SW-S01, SW-S03].
Non-negotiable safety rules
Confidentiality
Do not send unpublished manuscripts, peer-review or editorial material, sensitive or restricted data, PHI or other personal data, proprietary content, or source documents to an external service without:
- explicit authorization from a person or body empowered to grant it; and
- a documented review of journal, institutional, funder, consent, ethics, contractual, legal, and data-use policy.
When authorization or policy is unclear, keep processing local and use only the minimum
metadata needed. De-identification requires expert review; removing obvious names is
not sufficient. See references/authorship_ai_confidentiality.md.
No fabrication
Never invent or complete:
- citations, references, DOI, PMID, PMCID, ISBN, URLs, or quotations;
- results, data values, denominators, sample sizes, units, effect estimates, uncertainty, statistical tests, or significance claims;
- methods, materials, protocol details, software versions, analysis choices, or deviations;
- registrations, approvals, consent, ethics statements, participant details, or dates;
- authors, author order, CRediT roles, acknowledgments, or permissions;
- funding, sponsor roles, conflicts, data or code availability, or AI disclosures.
Use an explicit missing, unverified, or not-applicable state. Do not substitute plausible boilerplate.
Evidence binding
Every factual or numeric manuscript claim must map to verified evidence IDs. A human verifier must open the source, confirm the proposition and locator, verify bibliographic metadata, and record who verified it and when.
Search snippets, generated summaries, memory, and another work's bibliography may aid
discovery but do not verify a claim. See references/evidence_workflow.md.
What ships with it
30 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- assets/authorship_template.json 1.2 KB
- assets/claim_evidence_template.csv 218 B
- assets/consistency_manifest_template.json 891 B
- assets/manuscript_manifest_template.json 1012 B
- assets/manuscript_scaffold.md 1.9 KB
- assets/REPORT_FORMATTING_GUIDE.md 2.6 KB
- assets/reporting_coverage_template.json 189 B
- assets/reporting_guidelines.json 16 KB
- assets/source_manifest_template.json 599 B
- references/authorship_ai_confidentiality.md 4.4 KB
- references/citation_styles.md 3.7 KB
- references/cli_reference.md 3.5 KB
- references/evidence_workflow.md 3.8 KB
- references/figures_tables.md 3.8 KB
- references/imrad_structure.md 4.4 KB
- references/journal_policies.md 2.5 KB
- references/professional_report_formatting.md 3.2 KB
- references/reporting_guidelines.md 4.7 KB
- references/research_integrity_open_science.md 4.1 KB
- references/source_ledger.md 9.9 KB
- references/writing_principles.md 3.8 KB
- scripts/_common.py 7.5 KB runs code
- scripts/audit_claims.py 8.6 KB runs code
- scripts/check_consistency.py 14 KB runs code
- scripts/check_references.py 6.9 KB runs code
- scripts/lint_manuscript.py 5.7 KB runs code
- scripts/scaffold_manuscript.py 4.2 KB runs code
- scripts/select_reporting_guidelines.py 7.4 KB runs code
- scripts/validate_authorship.py 11 KB runs code
- scripts/validate_manifest.py 14 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +17 lines f6026e7d79cd
- 11d ago First seen · 357 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 31f4fb3c0df5
scientific-writing is a skill published in the GitHub repository Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills (2 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 3,004 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to scientific-writing, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
papers-reading-skill
Evidence-grounded AI research workflow for turning supplied economics, finance, management, and social-science papers or structured records into versioned PaperReading artifacts. Use when Codex must ingest text, Markdown, or a text-based PDF; separate source-grounded claims from researcher analysis; bind findings to…
scopus-researcher
Expert academic researcher using the Scopus MCP. Finds papers, retrieves full abstracts, builds author profiles, analyzes citation impact, and constructs advanced Boolean queries across the Elsevier Scopus database. Activate when asked to search for academic papers, analyze research trends, find citations, profile…
write-literature-review
Iterative literature-review workflow for a research topic. Use this skill to draft up to 10 search keywords, build a seed set from OpenAlex title-and-abstract matches, expand by backward and forward citations, screen candidates by title and abstract, repeat until no new relevant papers remain, rank the final set…
nature-experiment-log
A workflow for turning experiment notes, images, audio, or text into structured Markdown laboratory logs with YAML metadata. It can also organize raw attachments and optionally connect the logs to Feishu or Obsidian.
researchwrite
Proposal-first scientific writing pipeline, installed under the compatibility trigger researchwrite and the repository package name nature-proposal-writer. Use for composing, revising, or auditing research proposals, opening reports, research plans, and evidence-grounded scientific writing. Three modes…
nature-writing
Draft, restructure, or plan Nature-style manuscript sections and initial-submission materials from author-provided claims, results, figures, notes, or Chinese drafts. Use for abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, Results or experiments, discussions, conclusions, titles, full manuscript arguments, and…