Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills --skill sport-geography-review-bibliometricgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/sport-geography-review-bibliometric)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/sport-geography-review-bibliometric"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/sport-geography-review-bibliometric/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/sport-geography-review-bibliometric"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills/sport-geography-review-bibliometric.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00137 | $0.01353 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.00677 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00271 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
sport-geography-review-bibliometric scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Sport Geography Review Bibliometric
This skill supports systematic reviews, scoping reviews, critical reviews, and bibliometric/scientometric manuscripts in sport geography and urban health geography. It is designed for work that combines sports facilities, parks, green/heat exposure, accessibility, equity, spatial justice, and planning implications.
Use it to move from a broad topic and paper corpus to a journal-positioned review manuscript with reproducible search logic, defensible coding, meaningful bibliometric maps, and a policy agenda.
Core Contract
Do not treat bibliometrics as the contribution. The contribution must be one of:
- a clarified concept boundary;
- a systematic evidence map;
- a method evolution framework;
- a justice/equity coding framework;
- a journal-fit planning or policy agenda;
- a combined review + bibliometric route that explains why the field matters.
Default argument chain:
public health and active living pressure -> unequal spatial opportunity -> exposure/accessibility measurement gap -> evidence synthesis -> method and justice framework -> planning agenda
Fast Workflow
-
Position the manuscript
- Decide whether the paper is a systematic review, scoping review, bibliometric review, or hybrid review.
- Choose one target route: SCS/Cities, landscape-green-space journals, health-exposure journals, or broader geography/planning journals.
- Read
references/00_skill_design_principles.mdwhen updating the skill itself. - Read
references/01_positioning_and_journal_route.md.
-
Define scope and search logic
- Separate object terms, exposure/accessibility terms, equity/justice terms, health/activity terms, and exclusions.
- Use WoS + Scopus by default for bibliometrics; add PubMed/SPORTDiscus/Dimensions only when the research question needs health or sport coverage.
- Read
references/02_search_prisma_protocol.md.
-
Build the evidence corpus
- Document search date, database, query, filters, de-duplication, and screening reasons.
- Keep OA/non-OA status, DOI, journal, partition label, and manual-download status separate from inclusion decisions.
- Use
assets/PRISMA筛选记录模板.xlsxandassets/文献批判性编码模板.xlsx.
What ships with it
14 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- agents/openai.yaml 382 B
- references/00_skill_design_principles.md 1.6 KB
- references/01_positioning_and_journal_route.md 4.8 KB
- references/02_search_prisma_protocol.md 3.6 KB
- references/03_bibliometric_workflow.md 3.2 KB
- references/04_critical_coding_framework.md 2.8 KB
- references/05_manuscript_structure.md 2.4 KB
- references/06_figures_tables_policy_agenda.md 2.2 KB
- references/07_quality_checks.md 1.9 KB
- references/08_local_corpus_guide.md 1.9 KB
- references/09_prompt_library.md 22 KB
- references/10_top_journal_review_patterns.md 17 KB
- scripts/audit_review_library.py 2.2 KB runs code
- scripts/create_review_templates.py 4.3 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 98 lines · 137 tokens per session scan A 04b5e2697fcc
sport-geography-review-bibliometric is a skill published in the GitHub repository Lzy599775/agent-auto-sci-skills (2 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 137 tokens to every session and 1,353 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
papers-reading-skill
Evidence-grounded AI research workflow for turning supplied economics, finance, management, and social-science papers or structured records into versioned PaperReading artifacts. Use when Codex must ingest text, Markdown, or a text-based PDF; separate source-grounded claims from researcher analysis; bind findings to…
scopus-researcher
Expert academic researcher using the Scopus MCP. Finds papers, retrieves full abstracts, builds author profiles, analyzes citation impact, and constructs advanced Boolean queries across the Elsevier Scopus database. Activate when asked to search for academic papers, analyze research trends, find citations, profile…
write-literature-review
Iterative literature-review workflow for a research topic. Use this skill to draft up to 10 search keywords, build a seed set from OpenAlex title-and-abstract matches, expand by backward and forward citations, screen candidates by title and abstract, repeat until no new relevant papers remain, rank the final set…
nature-experiment-log
A workflow for turning experiment notes, images, audio, or text into structured Markdown laboratory logs with YAML metadata. It can also organize raw attachments and optionally connect the logs to Feishu or Obsidian.
researchwrite
Proposal-first scientific writing pipeline, installed under the compatibility trigger researchwrite and the repository package name nature-proposal-writer. Use for composing, revising, or auditing research proposals, opening reports, research plans, and evidence-grounded scientific writing. Three modes…
nature-writing
Draft, restructure, or plan Nature-style manuscript sections and initial-submission materials from author-provided claims, results, figures, notes, or Chinese drafts. Use for abstracts, introductions, related work, methods, Results or experiments, discussions, conclusions, titles, full manuscript arguments, and…