urban-exposure-review-radar-workflow

Urban Exposure Review Radar Workflow

This skill turns a broad geography + sport + urban health idea into a reproducible review, frontier radar, or review-informed empirical research plan.

It combines two transferable patterns:

• review workflow discipline: project structure, search, screening, extraction, synthesis, drafting, audit, citation export;
• research radar discipline: current-source scanning, remote-sensing / CV transfer analysis, ranked reading queues, publishable idea generation.

Output Contract

For every substantial request, return these blocks unless the user asks for a smaller answer:

1. 研究定位: review type, target journal route, contribution boundary.
2. 流程路线: staged workflow with inputs, outputs, and checkpoints.
3. 检索/雷达策略: formal databases and, when needed, frontier sources.
4. 提取与编码: variables, coding fields, quality or bias checks.
5. 分析与图表: bibliometric, evidence-map, spatial, remote-sensing, or health-linkage outputs.
6. 写作与门控: manuscript structure, claim-evidence audit, citation and genre checks.
7. 风险与下一步: failure modes, fallback, and the next concrete action.

If the user asks for an executable setup, create or recommend a project scaffold using scripts/create_review_radar_scaffold.py.

Workflow

1. Classify the task

   • Choose exactly one primary route: narrative review, systematic review, scoping review, bibliometric + critical review, frontier radar, empirical study design, or hybrid.
   • If the route is ambiguous, stop at a checkpoint and ask the user to choose.
   • Read references/workflow_playbook.md.

2. Set the journal and contribution boundary

   • SCS / Cities: emphasize urban governance, planning mechanism, spatial equity, sustainability, policy agenda.
   • Health & Place / Environment International / Environmental Research: emphasize exposure validity, health outcome definition, confounding, causal caution.
   • Urban Forestry & Urban Greening / Landscape and Urban Planning: emphasize green infrastructure, landscape planning, ecosystem and social benefits.
   • Nature-family urban/health outlets: require strong conceptual novelty, data credibility, mechanism, and generalizable contribution.