Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add makenotion/notion-cookbook --skill spec-to-implementationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/makenotion/notion-cookbookWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/makenotion/notion-cookbook/spec-to-implementation)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makenotion/notion-cookbook/spec-to-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makenotion/notion-cookbook/spec-to-implementation/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/makenotion/notion-cookbook/spec-to-implementation"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/makenotion/notion-cookbook/spec-to-implementation.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00050 | $0.00971 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00388 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00194 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
notion-spec-to-implementation scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- notion-spec-to-implementation — 100% identical, 271 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 83 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Spec to implementation
Translate requirements into verifiable work while preserving constraints, acceptance criteria, dependencies, and traceability to the source spec.
Workflow
- Select the requested outcome. Distinguish a plan, task creation, implementation, and a progress update. Complete the requested combination. A plan alone does not require task pages or an “In Progress” status. If actual implementation is requested and code tools are available, continue through implementation and appropriate validation; do not stop at planning.
- Read the specification. Fetch a supplied URL directly; otherwise search by project or title. Resolve ambiguous matches. Extract functional and non-functional requirements, acceptance criteria, constraints, dependencies, and unresolved decisions. Preserve explicit out-of-scope items. When code is available, inspect relevant implementation and repository instructions before choosing an approach. Label assumptions and estimates; do not invent commitments.
- Plan at useful granularity. Choose independently verifiable deliverables and identify prerequisite work. Use phases only when they help coordinate the work. Preserve requirement-to-task coverage, including validation. Fit estimates to the team's conventions when requested or useful; do not force a task count, number of phases, or 1–2-day duration. Reuse an existing plan when updating it.
- Create tasks when requested. Fetch the supplied task database directly or discover it if unknown. Read its schema once; identify the correct data source, title, status options, and relation targets. Check for existing tasks covering the same spec before creating duplicates. Each task needs an objective, source requirements, testable acceptance criteria, and dependencies. Use supported batching for independent creates when it reduces calls; link task dependencies after IDs exist. Do not guess assignees, dates, or relation values.
- Implement or track progress within scope. Update statuses when work actually starts or meets the team's completion criteria. Record meaningful changes, blockers, decisions, and links to tests, PRs, or deliverables. Reuse existing notes; avoid repetitive updates with no new information. Compute progress from observed task or requirement coverage and explain the denominator. A created plan or task is not evidence of completed implementation.
- Verify and report. Check created/updated pages, requirement coverage, schema values, and links. Read back writes when their result is unclear. Return links and distinguish planned, created, implemented, verified, and blocked work. If a batch partially succeeds, retain successful IDs, inspect uncertain outcomes, and retry only missing work.
What ships with it
18 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- evaluations/basic-spec-implementation.json 1.1 KB
- evaluations/discover-spec-and-destination.json 3.1 KB
- evaluations/implement-small-spec.json 1.3 KB
- evaluations/partial-create-recovery.json 1.5 KB
- evaluations/README.md 2.4 KB
- evaluations/spec-change-progress.json 1.6 KB
- evaluations/spec-to-tasks.json 1.4 KB
- examples/api-feature.md 13 KB
- examples/database-migration.md 2.4 KB
- examples/ui-component.md 1.6 KB
- reference/milestone-summary-template.md 460 B
- reference/progress-tracking.md 9.7 KB
- reference/progress-update-template.md 424 B
- reference/quick-implementation-plan.md 703 B
- reference/spec-parsing.md 6.8 KB
- reference/standard-implementation-plan.md 3.5 KB
- reference/task-creation-template.md 822 B
- reference/task-creation.md 8.3 KB
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago Changed · -135 lines 0fe3e0e04019
- 1mo ago First seen · 218 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 76c035adf07d
notion-spec-to-implementation is a skill published in the GitHub repository makenotion/notion-cookbook (220 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 971 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
story-readiness
Checks whether a story is ready to implement: clear acceptance criteria, no open questions, valid ADR and dependencies. Use when the user asks if a story, or the sprint's stories, are ready to start or build.
recipe-create-meet-space
Create a Google Meet meeting space and share the join link.
workthreads
SpecStory Workthreads - a weekly work-thread rollup across a team's repos from SpecStory coding histories (any agent - Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini, and more). It groups the window's sessions into threads of work per project and labels each new / open / recently closed, so a lead sees what shipped, what is still…
atmos-config
Atmos root configuration: atmos.yaml discovery, precedence, deep merging, basepath, imports, minimal bootstrap, and routing to narrower Atmos skills.
qa-project-bootstrap
Onboard a new QA engineer to an existing codebase, or audit an existing test architecture. Produces a 30-day ramp plan: codebase orientation, framework walkthrough, test architecture audit, mentorship pairing, and first-test guidance. Use when: "QA onboarding," "new tester," "ramp up," "test architecture audit,"…
remove
Remove a deployed framework or addon from the current workspace.