Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add malekokour/clinpharm-pmx-skills --skill review-bioequivalence-statistics-tost-confidence-intervalsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/malekokour/clinpharm-pmx-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/malekokour/clinpharm-pmx-skills/review-bioequivalence-statistics-tost-confidence-intervals)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/malekokour/clinpharm-pmx-skills/review-bioequivalence-statistics-tost-confidence-intervals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/malekokour/clinpharm-pmx-skills/review-bioequivalence-statistics-tost-confidence-intervals/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/malekokour/clinpharm-pmx-skills/review-bioequivalence-statistics-tost-confidence-intervals"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/malekokour/clinpharm-pmx-skills/review-bioequivalence-statistics-tost-confidence-intervals.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00146 | $0.02681 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00073 | $0.01340 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00536 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00268 |
Grade A, and why
review-bioequivalence-statistics-tost-confidence-intervals scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 231 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Review Bioequivalence Statistics TOST Confidence Intervals
Bioequivalence statistics - TOST and confidence intervals evidence pack — bounded review / prepare / structure workflow for the L3 task Bioequivalence statistics - TOST and confidence intervals (Band A · Quantitative pharmacology).
Skills review, reconcile, verify, structure and flag. Qualified humans decide, approve, sign off, submit and act.
Four-box contract
| Box | Content |
|---|---|
| Trigger | Please review the materials for Bioequivalence statistics - TOST and confidence intervals and produce a sourced finding register — do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome. |
| Input | Primary package for Bioequivalence statistics - TOST and confidence intervals plus the supporting pack in Required inputs |
| Output | Source-linked finding register with denominators; gap / contradiction flags; refuse list |
| Refuses | Decide the outcome of Bioequivalence statistics - TOST and confidence intervals; approve or submit related documents; select or adjust a dose; speak for the sponsor to an agency |
Who this is for
Clinical pharmacology or pharmacometrics practitioners working on Quantitative pharmacology who need a repeatable, sourced pass over Bioequivalence statistics - TOST and confidence intervals — not a decision and not a filing.
When to use this skill
- "Please review the materials for Bioequivalence statistics - TOST and confidence intervals and produce a sourced finding register — do not decide the clinical or regulatory outcome."
- "What is evidenced, missing, or inconsistent for: Bioequivalence statistics - TOST and confidence intervals?"
- "Trace every material statement about Bioequivalence statistics - TOST and confidence intervals to a locator."
- "Prepare the review pack for Bioequivalence statistics - TOST and confidence intervals before a meeting or QC cut."
When NOT to use this skill
| Request | Why not this skill | Where it belongs |
|---|---|---|
| Decide clinical significance, dose, or labelling outcome | Human decision | Qualified clinical pharmacologist / labelling owner |
| Approve, sign off, or submit | Human authority | Accountable owner / signatory |
| A different L3 neighbour sharing vocabulary only | Wrong grain or human-owned | the neighbour skill named by the router |
| Decide clinical significance or dose | Wrong grain or human-owned | qualified clinical pharmacologist |
| Run or re-fit a model as the primary ask | Modelling execution | Modelling environment + human modeller |
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 231 lines · 146 tokens per session scan A 040678a2eb03
review-bioequivalence-statistics-tost-confidence-intervals is a skill published in the GitHub repository malekokour/clinpharm-pmx-skills (6 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 146 tokens to every session and 2,681 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
imaging-data-commons
Query and download public cancer imaging data from NCI Imaging Data Commons. Invoke for any question about IDC collections, cancer imaging datasets, DICOM data access, radiology (CT, MR, PET) or pathology AI training sets, metadata queries, visualization, or license checks — even when the user doesn't explicitly…
lab-hardware-cad
Design custom laboratory hardware as parametric build123d models and export fabrication-ready STEP, STL, and DXF files - microfluidic chips and molds, optomechanical mounts and breadboard adapters, cuvette and microplate holders, tube racks, animal-behavior rigs, and 3D-printed instrument fixtures. Use when a research…
diffdock
DiffDock and DiffDock-L molecular docking. Use for protein-small-molecule pose prediction from PDB or sequence plus SMILES/SDF/MOL2, batch docking, virtual screening, and pose-confidence interpretation. Not for binding affinity prediction.
latex-posters
Create professional research posters in LaTeX using beamerposter, tikzposter, or baposter. Support for conference presentations, academic posters, and scientific communication. Includes layout design, color schemes, multi-column formats, figure integration, and poster-specific best practices for visual communication.
onekgpd
Query the 1000 Genomes Project dataset (3,202 whole-genome-sequenced individuals, GRCh38) at the level of individual participants. Use when a question is about individuals or variants in the 1000 Genomes Project cohort: which individuals carry variants matching specific criteria in a gene or region, which individuals…
statistical-analysis
Guided statistical analysis for research data - test selection, assumption checking, effect sizes, power analysis, Bayesian alternatives, and APA-formatted reporting. Use whenever a user wants to compare groups, test a hypothesis, analyze experimental or survey data, check statistical assumptions, compute required…