Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/marcoemrich/agentic_coding_lab/greennpx skills add marcoemrich/agentic_coding_lab --skill greengit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/marcoemrich/agentic_coding_labWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00016 | $0.01329 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00665 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00266 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00133 |
Grade A, and why
green scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 186 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
TDD Green Phase
You are now in the Green Phase of TDD. Follow these instructions to implement the minimal code that makes the failing test pass.
Your Mission
Guide developers through the Green phase of TDD by helping them:
- Implement the minimal code necessary to make the failing test pass
- Use the simplest possible solution (hardcoded values are acceptable)
- Avoid adding features for future tests
- Verify all tests pass
- Maintain strict TDD discipline - no optimization, no refactoring yet
Context: $ARGUMENTS
Green Phase Rules
- Minimal code only: Just enough to pass the current test
- Baby steps: Make the smallest possible change
- No future features: Don't implement what future tests might need
- Simple is better: Hardcoded returns are perfectly fine
- Tests must pass: Verify all tests are green
- No refactoring yet: Save improvements for Refactor phase
Green Phase Process
Step 1: Analyze the Failing Test
- Understand what the test expects
- Identify the minimal change needed
- Consider the simplest possible solution
Step 2: Write Minimal Implementation
- Implement only what's needed to make the current test pass
- Use the simplest possible solution:
- Hardcoded return values (
return 0,return true,return []) - Single line implementations
- No complex logic unless absolutely necessary
- Hardcoded return values (
- Don't add features for future tests
- Don't optimize or refactor yet
Step 3: Run Tests
- Execute the test suite
- Verify the current test now passes
- Ensure all previously passing tests still pass
Step 4: Verify No Over-Implementation
Check for these violations:
- Did you implement features for future tests?
- Did you add logic not demanded by current test?
- Did you optimize prematurely?
- Did you refactor existing code?
If any answer is "yes", remove the extra code.
Step 5: Report Completion
Green Phase Complete:
**Implementation**: [describe what was implemented]
**Result**: All tests now pass
**Approach**: [explain why this is minimal]
Proceeding to Refactor phase.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 186 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 72059e5542ee
green is a skill published in the GitHub repository marcoemrich/agentic_coding_lab (11 stars, last pushed 16d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 1,329 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
agent-integration
Run all three agent integration phases sequentially: research, write-tests, and implement using E2E-first TDD (unit tests written last). For individual phases, use /agent-integration:research, /agent-integration:write-tests, or /agent-integration:implement. Use when the user says "integrate agent", "add agent…
engram-testing-coverage
TDD and coverage standards for Engram. Trigger: When implementing behavior changes in any package.
code-assist
Guides implementation of code tasks using test-driven development in an Explore, Plan, Code, Commit workflow. Acts as a Technical Implementation Partner and TDD Coach — following existing patterns, avoiding over-engineering, and producing idiomatic, modern code.
tdd
Test-driven development. Use when the user wants to build features or fix bugs test-first, mentions "red-green-refactor", or wants integration tests.
css-design-tdd
Test-driven CSS design system modifications. Run checks before/after CSS changes to verify token usage, variable definitions, fallbacks, and consistency. Use when modifying CSS tokens, fixing design inconsistencies, or auditing CSS architecture.
mobiai-mobile-tdd
You MUST use this before writing any implementation code for a mobile feature, bug fix, refactor, or behavior change. Tests come before implementation — no exceptions.